Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists against proposed ivory auction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:59 AM
Original message
Scientists against proposed ivory auction
Researchers want science to take precedence over politics in decisions on elephants.

Anjali Nayar


Researchers are pushing for science to be given a bigger role in the debate over ivory sales.DigitalStock
Top elephant scientists are up in arms over the prospect of elephant-poaching hot spots in Africa being allowed to sell off their ivory stockpiles.

The proposals by Tanzania and Zambia to sell a combined 112 tonnes of ivory worth an estimated US$17.5 million will be tabled during the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in Doha, Qatar, on 13–25 March. Despite the two nations' poor track records in elephant protection, conservationists are worried that the proposals could be accepted because of an ongoing CITES debate over how best to manage elephant populations.

Some countries favour auctions because they bring in revenue, which is needed to sustain protection programmes. Others worry that one-off sales risk stimulating the illegal ivory trade, and ignore the reality of the burgeoning demand from the middle classes in Asia for ivory products such as seals and ornamental tusks.

In a paper published today in Science1, lead author Samuel Wasser, head of the Center for Conservation Biology at the University of Washington in Seattle, and more than 20 other elephant researchers argue for a bigger role for science in CITES decisions about elephant conservation.

"Politics seems to be driving the debate," says Wasser. "CITES has become so caught up in this debate of sustainable versus unsustainable use that the argument is blinding decisions that should be based on science."

more
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100311/full/news.2010.46.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. They shouldn't auction it. They should sell it for a small fraction of the market price.
Help drive the prices down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC