Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mars 'remains in embryonic state' (BBC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:24 AM
Original message
Mars 'remains in embryonic state' (BBC)
By Jennifer Carpenter
Science reporter, BBC News

Mars formed in record time, growing to its present size in a mere three million years, much quicker than scientists previously thought.

Its rapid formation could explain why the Red Planet is about one tenth the mass of Earth.

The study supports a 20-year-old theory that Mars remained small because it avoided collisions with planetary building material.
***
By studying the chemical composition of meteorites, geochemist Dr Nicholas Dauphas of the University of Chicago in Illinois and Dr Ali Pourmand of the University of Miami in Florida joined forces to try to confirm this.

By measuring the concentration of elements Thorium and Hafnium in 44 space-rocks Dr Pourmand and Dauphas have come up with the most precise estimate of the time it took Mars to form.
***
more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13567381
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
mn9driver Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not a new idea, but an interesting way to reach that conclusion
Using Hf-W-Th ratios to support the hypothesis is something I'm not familiar with, and the abstract doesn't give enough detail to really figure out their reasoning. For $32 to read the full article, I guess I can remain mystified. Oh well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. how much bigger would Mars be
if the asteroid belt had somehow smashed into it?

Obviously one way to make Mars more habitable would be to increase its mass. We don't have anywhere near the tech to do it, but one day we probably would. Although I think we could terraform it today for intermediate periods of time (and ungodly amounts of money that make the idea currently unthinkable). We'd still have to replenish an atmosphere that would be blown away by the solar winds or find a way to create a planetary magnetic field, but the former would be doable.

Not going to happen in the next 300 years but it's foreseeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC