Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Black Hole Physics Hint that Gravity May Not be a Constant of the Universe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:18 PM
Original message
Black Hole Physics Hint that Gravity May Not be a Constant of the Universe
New research by scientists at the University of York gives a fresh perspective on the physics of black holes. Black holes are objects in space that are so massive and compact they were described by Einstein as "bending" space. Conventional thinking asserts that black holes swallow everything that gets too close and that nothing can escape, but the study by Professor Samuel Braunstein and Dr Manas Patra suggests that information could escape from black holes after all.

The implications could be revolutionary, suggesting that gravity may not be a fundamental force of Nature.

Professor Braunstein says: "Our results didn't need the details of a black hole's curved space geometry. That lends support to recent proposals that space, time and even gravity itself may be emergent properties within a deeper theory. Our work subtly changes those proposals, by identifying quantum information theory as the likely candidate for the source of an emergent theory of gravity."

But quantum mechanics is the theory of light and atoms, and many physicists are skeptical that it could be used to explain the slow evaporation of black holes without incorporating the effects of gravity.

more
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/08/news-flash-black-hole-physics-hint-that-gravity-may-not-be-a-constant-of-the-universe.html
Refresh | +16 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gravity is a curious thing
thanks for the post
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Indeed. I find that I've gotten heavier as time has passed.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I find that I'm getting taller as I age, the floor gets farther away each year
Also my hair doesn't seem to be able to quite keep up with my increase in height.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Heavy
IIRC, in James Gleick's book The Information, he describes a bet that Hawking made with another scientist, that information could not survive a black hole. Can't tell you exactly how they solved it (Vulcan mind experiment) but Hawking paid off. This occurred a few years ago.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I believe the solution to that led to the idea of the holographic universe.
...

The whole argument started when Stephen Hawking attempted to describe what happens to matter during its lifetime in a black hole. He suggested that, from the perspective of quantum mechanics, the information about the quantum state of a particle that enters a black hole goes with it. This isn't a problem until the black hole starts to boil away through what's now called Hawking radiation, which creates a separate particle outside the event horizon while destroying one inside. This process ensures that the matter that escapes the black hole has no connection to the quantum state of the material that had gotten sucked in. As a result, information is destroyed. And that causes a problem, as the panel described.

As far as quantum mechanics is concerned, information about states is never destroyed. This isn't just an observation; according to panelist Leonard Susskind, destroying information creates paradoxes that, although apparently minor, will gradually propagate and eventually cause inconsistencies in just about everything we think we understand. As panelist Leonard Susskind put it, "all we know about physics would fall apart if information is lost."

...


't Hooft described how the disagreement eventually got worked out. It's possible, he said, to figure out how much information has gotten drawn in to the black hole. Once you do that, you can see that the total amount can be related to the surface area of the event horizon, which suggested where the information could be stored. But since the event horizon is a two-dimensional surface, the information couldn't be stored in regular matter; instead, the event horizon forms a hologram that holds the information as matter passes through it. When that matter passes back out as Hawking radiation, the information is restored.

more ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Great article! Thank you!
--imm :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gravity as described by classical potential theory/Laplace's equation.
Edited on Sat Aug-13-11 12:04 AM by The_Casual_Observer
The effect is immediate, no wave behavior,ie disturbance is felt without any delay throughout space. The law of attraction between bodies is known, but the cause is a total mystery. All attempts to measure any sort of "gravity waves" or medium of transmission of a "gravity field" have led to nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DetlefK Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. We just don't have a decent gravity wave detector yet.
I have in the back of my head, that one is being built right now, finished in 5-10 years. Don't remember clearly.

Don't forget that gravity waves are hard to detect.
Gravity has only one kind of charge and because of this, you need a quadrupole-antenna to emit/measure gravity waves. And of course, because money matters, we would have to build the detector on a planet, where it is prone to earthquakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC