Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Researchers devise brain-machine interface with a sense of touch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:51 AM
Original message
Researchers devise brain-machine interface with a sense of touch
By Kyle Niemeyer

Imagine: a robotic prosthetic arm that you can not only control with your brain, but actually feel when it touches something. This might sound like science fiction, but a team of researchers designed and tested a system with monkeys that does just this. They call their setup a "brain-machine-brain interface," or BMBI, and it has the potential to give amputees closer-to-normal functionality.

Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) have come a long way in recent years, enabling complex robotic limbs with multiple degrees of freedom, but people rely on tactile feedback for fine control of their limbs. Try to imagine picking up something as simple as a glass without being able to feel when your fingers are around it—awkward and difficult. Unfortunately, this is one area where there has been less progress. One group used vibrational feedback to indicate touching, but otherwise most BMI systems rely on sight—until now.

The BMI portion of this new approach is similar to one we reported on a few years ago. The researchers implanted microelectrode wires in the primary motor cortex (also known as M1) of a monkey’s brain. M1 is the region of the brain responsible for movements, so by measuring electrical signals in particular places, the brain interface can effectively directly control robotic limbs.

There weren’t any robotic monkey arms here, though; the monkeys controlled a virtual arm on a computer monitor. Initially, this was done through a joystick (which they learned to use through fruit juice rewards). After it was clear that the monkeys could use the joystick to find virtual objects, the researchers switched the control of the virtual arm to the BMI—the monkeys still moved the joystick, but their brain signals actually moved the arm. The joystick was necessary because monkeys, unlike most humans, don’t respond well to being told to move their arms in a certain way.

more

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/10/researchers-devise-brain-machine-interface-with-a-sense-of-touch.ars
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
d_r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. very cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. When this technology is applied to telepresence, will they be called BIMBOs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tgearfanatic234 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. goodbye, again
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 10:22 AM by uppityperson
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is absolutely the coolest
If it can be done with a realtime-controlled object such as a robot arm then the next step is to have a virtual arm... Anyone see the movie Gamer? And / or one could play Halo or Gears of War and have a near true-to-life experience. Get the M$ Kinect, a big bowl of chips and there goes the entire day... wait... maybe I should just drop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Or, y'know, it could free the locked-in. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree. Both would be cool.
Stephen Hawking comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC