Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No charges against N.J. troopers accused of rape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 04:31 PM
Original message
No charges against N.J. troopers accused of rape

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — Seven state troopers accused of raping a woman at one of their homes will not be charged with a crime, a prosecutor said Thursday.

Stephanie Kurowsky, a spokeswoman for the Middlesex County prosecutor, said the case has been closed, but would not comment further.

In December, a woman told authorities that she had been raped by a group of off-duty troopers she met at a Trenton night club. The troopers said the activity at one of their homes later that night was consensual.

...

"The victim is extremely upset that the DA's office is not going to present the case to the grand jury and is not going to prosecute the matter," the woman's lawyer, Nat Dershowitz, said. "She feels she has been left without any justice."

He said there were delays in the investigation and his client was not treated fairly.

USA Today
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well maybe they didn't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sure!
Edited on Sat Jul-19-08 10:24 AM by gaspee
Lots of 25 year old women agree to gang sex with ugly old men! Women *love* that sort of thing! Why, just watch some porn and you'll know that women *want* to be hurt and humiliated while being fucked by 7 guys.


And it case anyone didn't get it....

:sarcasm:
:sarcasm:
:sarcasm:

I'd be all over the benefit of the doubt and inocent until proven guilty thing, but these guys admit it happened but say it was consensual. Yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's pretty much what I was thinking when I read this.
I'd like to see a study done to find out what percentage of women would actually agree to this kind of activity in real life. I'd bet it would be a very, very small number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Apparently that's not relevant.
If establishing guilt or innocence were a concern, they'd have a trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Only if there were sufficient evidence of guilt, and/or insufficient evidence of innocence.
If they're not holding a trial, the most likely reason is that they don't think there's enough evidence to justify it, or even that they think there's enough evidence of innocence to justify not doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you for adding your insight
once again to the women's rights forum. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Troopers won't be charged in rape allegation
Middlesex County Prosecutor Bruce Kaplan announced that the case was closed. He declined to elaborate, but lawyers involved in the case said it was terminated without being brought before a grand jury.

...

The 25-year-old student alleged she was assaulted by several men, including one or more off-duty troopers, at the Ewing Township home of one of the officers after a night of drinking in a Trenton nightclub.

...

Kaplan declined any comment, citing concerns for privacy and fairness and the possibility that the State Police will bring administrative charges against the troopers.

Fahy said he anticipates the troopers will face an internal investigation, though they are planning to return to work Monday. In a joint statement, he and the lawyers for the other six troopers cited the prosecutor's decision as vindication.

...

Dershowitz said the victim is considering whether to file a civil lawsuit or a civil rights complaint with the U.S. Attorney's Office. That decision should be made within coming weeks, he said.

...

"If you get somebody drunk or you take advantage of somebody who's drunk, there's a lack of consent," he said. "I understand that it's a tough case to prosecute, but that doesn't mean that tough prosecutors don't know how to do it."

Everthing NJ


"any sufficiently motivated prosecutor could put anyone in prison for the violation of some federal law."

Robert Jackson, US Attorney General, made a famous speech almost 70 years ago that included the following remarks:

The prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.

His discretion is tremendous.

The prosecutor can order arrests, present cases to the grand jury in secret session, and on the basis of his one-sided presentation of the facts, can cause the citizen to be indicted and held for trial.

He may dismiss the case before trial, in which case the defense never has a chance to be heard.

...

While the prosecutor at his best is one of the most beneficent forces in our society, when he acts from malice or other base motives, he is one of the worst.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. "night of drinking" should be the operative phrase. She probably wasn't capable of consent.
Yes, people often imbibe too much and hook up with strangers. But this situation probably does not fall in that category. No way in hell out of 7 guys there weren't at least one or two who were cognizant that something was awry, but they went ahead and preyed upon the woman anyway. And as law enforcement officers, they should know damn well better than to have sex with a woman they picked up in a bar who'd been drinking. At least they're facing administrative charges and I hope the woman sues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC