Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EFF/Novell Patent Busting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Open Source and Free Software Group Donate to DU
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 02:29 AM
Original message
EFF/Novell Patent Busting

I. The Problem

Every year numerous illegitimate patent applications make their way through the United States patent examination process without adequate review. The problem is particularly acute in the software and Internet fields where the history of prior inventions (often called “prior art”) is widely distributed and poorly documented. As a result, we have seen patents asserted on such simple technologies as:

* One-click online shopping (U.S. Patent No. 5,960,411.)
* Online shopping carts (U.S. Patent No. 5,715,314.)
* The hyperlink (U.S. Patent No. 4,873,662.)
* Video streaming (U.S. Patent No. 5,132,992.)
* Internationalizing domain names (U.S. Patent No. 6,182,148.)
* Pop-up windows (U.S. Patent No. 6,389,458.)
* Targeted banner ads (U.S. Patent No. 6,026,368.)
* Paying with a credit card online (U.S. Patent No. 6,289,319.)
* Framed browsing; (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,933,841 & 6,442,574.) and
* Affiliate linking (U.S. Patent No. 6,029,141.)

More

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. My favorite, from a long time back...
... the notorious U.S. Patent 4,197,590 ... which included the use of the "exclusive or" (XOR) function in computer graphics.

It's not quite how the Open Source community presents it, but it was plenty bad enough. It was one of those things most everyone who was playing with computer graphics thought of right away, so it wasn't the sort of thing most of them would think to patent.

My own experience was with the CDP1802 - CDP1861 processor set, and when I first heard of the XOR patent, it was a real :wtf: experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Open Source and Free Software Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC