Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody else think Google Chrome browser handles downloads poorly?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Computer Help and Support Group Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 12:59 PM
Original message
Anybody else think Google Chrome browser handles downloads poorly?
I've played around with various browsers in recent years. And sometimes I download files that run to 100s of MB; the downloads from time to time are interrupted because the connection gets dropped somewhere along the line, and with the standard browsers usually I can simply resume the download without trouble. But with Google Chrome, the situation seems to be: download interrupted? sorry, you're out of luck!
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've tried a few D/L's with Chrome.



I think the largest was in the 30M range. I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary.

I've only been using Chrome for about three weeks now. I can't say I'm greatly impressed.

The main thing I don't like about it is the lack of add-ons that are of any interest to me.

But I figure give it time and maybe they will come up with more.

I use RoadRunner Broadband BTW. I haven't had any interruptions on any other browsers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not complaining about the downloads when they work: I complaining about recovering from
interruptions

For some other browsers I used, if the download server or my ISP drops the connection, the worst I have to do is (maybe reconnect to the internet and) hit pause/resume to continue the download: if say I'm 500mb through a 600mb download and something goes wromng, I can usually recover and complete the last 100mb of the download and have what I wanted

But with Chrome, if there's some screw-up partway through the download, nothing (that I've tried) recovers and continues the partial download: no, I have to start the whole mofo over from the beginning

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It only works in a single browser session
I found this link:

http://www.geek.com/articles/blurb/firefox-vs-google-chrome-download-suspend-resume-ready-20080923/

"Firefox lets you pause and resume downloads. The Google Chrome browser also has a feature with the same labels. However, they function differently in one very important way. Firefox lets you pause a download, close the browser, restart the browser (even after a reboot), and resume the download. Google Chrome only lets you resume a download during a single browser session. If you close the browser, you cannot resume the download after launching it a second time. There may be an option to change this behavior. But, this appears to be the default behavior."

I have to admit, I really like Chrome though. The element inspector feature is extraordinary. But I guess you should use Firefox for downloading large files.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That might in fact be related -- but I'm not talking about closing the browser,
and I'm not talking about user-initiated download pause/resumes: I'm talking about unintended download interruptions
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe but it handles extension worse.
So far I am not a fan of using separate memory space for loading extensions. If you use 1 or 2 ok but if you have a lot your going to crash the system eventually because the really bad memory leak that Chrome has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Computer Help and Support Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC