Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For stress relief (sort of) Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes' astrology.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Religion & Spirituality » Astrology, Spirituality & Alternative Healing Group Donate to DU
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-05 07:06 AM
Original message
For stress relief (sort of) Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes' astrology.
Edited on Sat Nov-26-05 07:19 AM by BlueIris
Alright, I know this isn't the sort of thing this forum usually indulges in, but I did see a Michael Jackson thread a while back (which I found fascinating, even if it was not directly related to government/political stuff) so I thought I'd give this a shot. The Tom and Katie gossip gets weirder every time I look for it. I'd love to know what our readers here are predicting for this pair as a couple. I personally, amateur that I am? See the relationship as one that while it has a small measure of potential for some positivity after the inevitable bitter end, is going to blow up as the kind of trainwreck that makes me hate that there is a child involved. I also think that there is a real danger that one of these three parties could be seriously harmed in this process.

Tom: July 3, 1962; Syracuse, NY, 3:06 p.m

Katie: December 18, 1978; Toledo, OH 9:32 p.m.

A note about my own impressions, especially of the composite horoscope I made of them as a pair: a few months ago, a good friend of mine shared a prediction about where Tom Cruise's career was going (this was just before Mr. Cruise got mixed up with Katie, incidentally). He said he felt that while many folks look on Tom with a mixture of pity and revulsion because of how closely he has entwined his life with Scientology, this guy actually thought that the "Entertainment Tonight" Saga of the Year we would all be watching some April night in 2010 would be titled, "Tom Cruise: Escape from the Scientologists," and that Tom would probably manage to make some sort of a career comeback out of his eventual return to the world outside the CoS. Strangely, that scenario sounded slightly plausible to me, despite how deeply burrowed in with the Church Cruise appears to be now. I half believe his relationship with Katie could be the catalyst that gets Tom started on this process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I had an idea over the weekend about them--not sure why,
I try to spend as little time thinking about Tom Cruise as I possibly can. But I wondered if they already knew that Katie was pregnant when they announced the engagement. And I wonder if Katie's pregnancy was a prerequisite for marriage to Tom. I'm certain it has become very important to him pass on his superlative DNA to the world. Poor Katie. If she ever does try to get out I don't think he would let her have managing custody of any of his children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Interesting.
Edited on Mon Nov-28-05 05:24 AM by BlueIris
About the idea that Katie being pregnant was a prerequisite for the marriage. That would be fascinating, if disturbing, if true. I always thought that she found herself unintentionally pregnant via her old boyfriend, and some friend of a friend knew Tom was looking for a woman (ASAP) to participate in his obvious scheme to be married and produce a child with someone as his "proof" to the world he isn't gay. My take on it is she was in a situation she didn't want to be in, engagement to him improved it and that was that.

The thing that horrifies me about what Katie Holmes is doing? The impression I get is that she thinks this arrangement is "no big deal." That the Scientology stuff is just wacky scenery. That she can "handle" them. It's possible she looks at the weirdness as just sillyness, instead of the danger that it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And also with Katie
I've heard that she was brought up Catholic and changed to Scientology when she met Tom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. I can't stand either of them. Yucky people. My
guess is that she was artificially inseminated and they had to see if it worked. I always thought it extremely odd that Cruise "allegedly" dumped Mimi Rogers because "she" couldn't have children, while he had his affair with Kidman. Immediately on marrying someone else, Mimi got pregnant. Nicole never had any natural children with Tom, and it is alleged that the miscarriage she had after being served with divorce papers , wasn't his. I don't think Cruise is gay, but something doesn't make it possible for him to appear to father children. I read once that his "religion" didn't encourage this for whatever reason. Anyone know anything about that? Also the tabloids were always stating that he had "weak runners" if ya know what I mean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Tom Cruise is a very, very gay person.
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 12:28 PM by BlueIris
I've read that he wanted to join the Cult of Scientology because of the "cure" they offer for homosexuality, which I would guess involves a ton of suppression therapy, conditioning, reprogramming, etc. It probably interferes with whatever ability to have sex with women he can conjure up. Don't you know about the lawsuits he's had to file against all of the male gay porn stars he's slept with? For Tom, everything in his life, including continuing to offer himself up to the Co$, is about covering up his gay identity, hence the desperate attempts to have a child as "proof" he isn't a big, fat, gay man. The Scientologists only discourage their non-celebrity members from having kids (which would lessen the hold the cult has on those members as the children would naturally become more important to the members than the Co$). They do everything they can to keep their cash cows happy. Incidentally, what I read about Nicole Kidman's miscarriage was that the pregnancy which ended had occurred through in vitro using Tom's sperm, as part of their ongoing attempt to have a child. He filed for divorce because they were approaching their tenth wedding anniversary, and after ten years, California law would have made Kidman entitled to half of Tom's estate, no matter what happened. The Church of Scientology, even with its crack team of vicious, highly-paid scam artists lawyers, couldn't find a way around that, and it was unacceptable to the cult members that someone else be entitled to more of Tom's money than they were. I have no idea what role the actual divorce papers played in the end of her pregnancy, but I do know that at one point, Tom's lawyers attempted to get their hands on the products of conception as a way of trying to prove his DNA wasn't involved so that they could claim Kidman had committed adultery (I think they were trying to smear and/or blackmail her to keep her from spilling secrets about the Scientologists or possibly to mess up whatever alimony/child support arrangement she would seek). In the end, their petitions were dropped, I assume because the developing fetus had been genetically Tom's.

Go to Xenu.net for more info on Scientology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Wow
I knew he was a weird guy and the whole thing was wacky but not that wacky. I didn't know he had sex with gay porn stars. I am a strong empath and can highly sense things from people (mostly emotions of course) and you can sense it with Tom. I do feel bad for him and I also think he's doing everything for his career. In showbusiness to be successful you have to be able to be macho and have sex scenes and romantic stuff. I'm sure it'd be hard to look like you're enjoying kissing someone of the opposite sex when you'd rather do so with someone of the same sex. I do remember when reading about the whole Katie/Tom thing feeling very weird about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Tom Cruise is either gay or sterile.
Maybe both. So who was the pinch-hitter?

I think Katie is young & naive & has no clue what she's getting into. I feel sorry for the kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh, good, another person who fears that Katie just doesn't get it.
My impression is still, as I've posted, that she thinks she's playing them. Which is...so stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. It could be both
I'm not sure. I think it could be a bit of both. On Katie's half she probably is trying to play them and just go along with everything. I found it rather strange how she changed her religion from Catholic just shortly after they "came out" as a "couple." Usually things like that take a long time don't they? Either that or Katie wasn't that big of a follower in the Catholic church and was more-so just brought up in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. you know, that might be it
Everyone keeps talking about how Holmes is a kid, but I was surprised to see her birthdate in the OP.

She's almost 27. Hardly a kid.

Naive, maybe, but not a kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I just really...I really fear for her.
She has no idea what she has gotten herself into. It's not immaturity, but it is over-confidence. My impression is that she thinks they're just polite, clean-looking, semi-weird followers of certain kinds of New Age spirituality and homeopathy. "No big deal, I'll just have the baby, we'll raise it together, I'll have to put up with the Scieno stuff for a while, (at least we'll be rich!) we'll split up eventually, I'll get custody and then get my career back on track. I was married to Tom Cruise and I have "Tom Cruise's" child, that will make me A-list by-proxy!" She doesn't know anything about what other women who've been married to the Scientologists' cash cow have been through (it is rumored that both Nicole and Mimi Rogers are still subjected to harassment, surveillance and threats by the CoS) after getting mixed up with those psychotic opportunists. It's. A. Cult. Tom Cruise is it's celebrity human-credential. Even if Holmes "leaves," she'll never leave. Don't think Katie's thought that over with anything like a serious attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Strange
When I read your post I just got the strongest sense of a ) Dejavu and b ) that he is just wanting children. I do think he cares about Katie but maybe not as the wife or something. I just pick up strange vibes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Self-delete.
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 01:04 PM by BlueIris
BlueIris is not unethical!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ahem. I was taught that it is unethical to discuss the death
of anyone using their chart. I have always followed this canon of Astrology, and I don't think this is appropriate here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Religion & Spirituality » Astrology, Spirituality & Alternative Healing Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC