Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our (Science-Based Medicine's) Visit with NCCAM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 09:59 AM
Original message
Our (Science-Based Medicine's) Visit with NCCAM
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=4575#more-4575

It amuses me when I link to SBM, because the reply from many is: "It's just a blog." Well, it looks like this "just a blog" (written by MD's, PhDs, etc...) is having a minor effect, at least in terms of discussing possible improvement in government funded research for CAM (er, scam) therapies.

How many "just a blogs" have gotten that far?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. "It's just a blog."
But this former GeoCities page that hawks supplements and warns against the dangers of amalgam is a valid source, dammit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. i really think its time
for people to get over the real/not real media divide. Or, rather, they should stop placing that divide between the internet and tv/radio. We are long past ignoring websites as information sources. "anyone with a blog" is not media. But you know who is? "anyone with a well-written, well-researched blog that has thousands of regular readers and a history of quality fact checking and corrections"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. S'alright
We're getting there with plenty of help from the "professional" media.

Not that some haven't already, but if blogs never rise to "pro" quality, FOXCNNMSNBC routinely pass them on their way to the basement. People know outfits like TPM hold to a standard of quality the chumps have no regard for anymore.

Keep shovelling the lurid poot, Rupert. It'll be fun watching you lose your shirt when you put your clownshow behind subscriber firewalls this summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Indeed.
The spectrum of quality is just as wide for blogs as it is for MSM and even alternative media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC