Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

By Vectron's Eyes! WTF is with people believing in Astrology?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 01:29 AM
Original message
By Vectron's Eyes! WTF is with people believing in Astrology?
:argh:

Every aspect of Astrology is 100% wrong. Seriously. Even the most basic premises of Astrology are predicated on fiction.

I submit that astrologers are demonstrably dumber than creationists.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Creationism holds that the Earth didn't always exist. That much is true.
Astrology is 100% fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. However, creationists believe creationism is "science."
I am not aware of astrologers who believe such. Also, I have never heard for astrologers demanding astrology be taught on the same level (or in schools) as astronomy as I have for creationism to be taught with the same equivalency of evolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I didn't say astrologers weren't less self-aware, just dumber.
Astrologers play the 'not science but you need to take us just as seriously' game.

Creationists (at least the professionals) know that what they promote isn't science, they just want their religion taught as fact. That's why they only go after evolution. They know that getting creationism taught in place of physics is impossible, so they present their anti-physics arguments as anti-evolution. It isn't ignorance, it's dishonesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Much respect for you, but I still disagree.
There is no science in creationism, none. Astrology may be a mix of things, but science is one of them, even if used incorrectly. Astrology gave rise (well, there was some help) to astronomy; creationism: G-d did it! IMO, it is much dumber to say "someone else did it," than "a complex (mis)alignment of stars and planets influence your behavior, etc." The latter may be more convoluted, but it shows at least some attempt to make sense of things around the person, the former is the excuse of bad lairs, criminals, and 5yos. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There's no science in either.
Looking up at the sky and saying, "I had a good day, that group of stars must be responsible" is superstition, not science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. True. But, astrology is not relegated to:
"Looking up at the sky and saying, "I had a good day, that group of stars must be responsible"." Astrology is complex, requiring a certain knowledge on inner workings, as well as, making adjustments. Creationism is just "G-d did it." There is no attempt to discover anything, the answer is always the same: G-d did it. I guess for me, someone who at least attempts to study something and reach conclusions, make adjustments and such, even if not scientific, shows more intelligence than someone who just says "G-d did it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. The complexity of astrology is no different than the garbage Hovind or Comfort spew.
There is nothing redeeming about astrology. It's simple fortune telling that trades chicken entrails for constellations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. That is your opinion as is the other. I still disagree.
I don't think those into astrology are more ignorant than creationists. I feel it is the other way for reasons stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I gave three opinions in that comment. With which do you disagree? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Apologies for being unclear.
I disagreed with your orginal opinion: "I submit that astrologers are demonstrably dumber than creationists." Sorry about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. No worries.
I was afraid that I was going to have to convince you that astrology is bullshit. That always takes time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Do all creationists, or even most, "believe creationism is a 'science'?"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't know about "all" but I have heard it referred to as the "science of G-d."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I know there is a minority that pushes such a version...
...but I'm not of the viewpoint that most creationists are in that vein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Perhaps they are a minority. However, I have seen more than just a few.
It may not be all, there are some that do believe evolution comes into play but it still stems back to "G-d did it."

The original premise of the thread is those into astrology are dumber than creationists. I disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. Astrology IS taught at Kepler College
(formerly Kepler College of Astrological Arts and Sciences), but this so-called college is not accredited.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_College
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. There's a great quote at that link:
"The fact is that astrology, whether judged by its theory or its practice, is bunkum. In a free society there is no reason to prevent those who wish to learn nonsense from finding teachers who want to make money peddling nonsense. But it is inexcusable for the government to certify teachers of nonsense as competent or to authorize — that is, endorse — the granting of degrees in nonsense."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Wow. How very enlightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. The sun signs are now all a full month off, aren't they?
Due to precession or some such phenomenon. Doesn't stop the astrologers, they keep peddling the same nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep.
Your 'sign' is supposedly based on which constellation the sun rises in on your birthday and due to precession, it's one 'sign' earlier than it was when the system was set up and continues to slowly advance. Eventually (c.1500-2000 years from now), it'll be two 'signs' off.

Never mind that over time stellar drift changes the shape of constellations or that constellations aren't actual structures...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Not to mention the discovery of a new astrological sign, Ophiucus, right?
It's used in sidereal astrology but not tropical astrology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_astrology
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Spoken like a typical (fill in the name of an astrological sign)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. I keep on wondering why anyone
believes in what economists say. How about all the 'trickle down' ones? Overall, astrology may have a better track record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't fit my sign (taurus) at all. It's complete hokey.
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 11:35 PM by Odin2005
OK, I AM stubborn, but other wise I fit the profiles for Pisces and Aquarius better.

It amazes me that people believe this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Technically, you're probably an Aries.
Your sign is supposed to be based on which constellation the sun rises in on your birthday. The tables that give a sign for a range of dates are off by one because while the Earth wobbles on its axis, no one in the astrology community noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. There are some astrologers that do take precession into account.
and I am an Aries according to them, LOL! (my birthday is April 28).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Are they persecuted as heretics by the greater astrological community?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. No clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. there are already schisms
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 11:06 PM by realisticphish
planetary astrology vs star astrology, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. back when I would play with astrologers
one of my favourite things to do was give them a fake birth date, then watch them go off about this and that personality trait I exhibit matches perfectly. Of course, lying is probably a trait for my supposed sign. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. My favorite astrology story
I read in that infallible reference - Somewhere - that "Persian Court Astrologer" wasn't a very secure career path.

One of the Persian kings had a nightly walk around the walls of Babylon with his Court Astrologer.

If the king didn't like the forecast, he whistled up a couple of guards. Who chucked the astrologer over the wall to his certain death.

Also read somewhere: when Alexander The Great conquered Babylon in 331 BCE, he captured centuries of written Persian astrological records. These records were turned over to the Greek astronomers, who ignored the woo and eventually made honest scientific documents out of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC