|
Edited on Mon Aug-11-08 01:57 AM by MonteLukast
As I have repeatedly said elsewhere, there's something very different about this affair compared to the other affairs in recent memory. Yes, even Clinton's.
For one thing, it has the definite feel of an anomaly, not a pattern. And, as I said over and over again, he never stopped loving Elizabeth or sticking by her in her hour of need.
From what Hunter is starting to say, it looks like a case of powerful attraction and idolization taken to its logical conclusion. She seems very insistent, and even a bit delusional (to still believe they're going to be together!) -- I can definitely see her working on JRE until his resistance broke down.
It is definitely "Monica" territory in that the woman was the pursuer and the attraction was heavily lopsided on her side. Somebody wrote an excellent thread on the GD page detailing what was likely going through her head, and Hunter's reference to a "brilliant, generous, giving man who had two competing needs: his ego and his cause". While that's a beautiful description of his personal complexity and an easily recognizable portrait of his character, the poster made the point that such a line was also a well-crafted way to say she wanted to get in his pants. Compliments are an excellent way to charm men, particularly if they're being emotionally tested.
It's natural that people are going to wonder what JRE can be trusted with anymore-- to extrapolate his lies to everything he's done. You just never know. And plenty of people don't trust those who are especially good-looking, friendly, smooth or articulate... or who appear to have especially happy family lives, either. We naturally believe that if someone is to good to be true, they probably are. But I just can't join in that game with JRE. The entire picture just doesn't add up to a wholesale untrustworthy man.
The only thing that worries me is the money he paid her. The responsibility is on him to prove it was not improper. I hope my worries will not be confirmed as more details about the money come to light.
But overall, her character looks a lot shadier than his. I can a lot more easily imagine her blackmailing him for child support, than him being insincere about his ideas. It does seem odd that *she's* saying, "no paternity test", when her family is clamoring for it.
That same thread I mentioned earlier mentioned how Hunter seems the opposite of Elizabeth-- which definitely fits a diversion rather than a true emotional betrayal. In my experience, it's a lot rougher when the "other woman" could be considered an upgrade of the wife-- a younger, thinner, hotter, more fun, more pliable or affable version.
As was, of course, the case with John, Carol, and Cindy McCain!
|