I used to listen to him on Tom Joyner's show, and sometimes he would start controversies that had not a whole lot of factual support behind them. I thought the CompUSA thing was weak.
Here is a recent conflict he had with NPR. Smiley uses some pretty inflammaotry langauge, in my opinion.
Broadcast All Over
Tavis Smiley's NPR Show Is History, but the Talk Lives On
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14799-2005Jan16.htmlBy Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 17, 2005; Page C01
brief excerpt:
When Tavis Smiley walked away from his National Public Radio show last month, he did not go quietly.
In a series of interviews, he cast aspersions on his former employer, telling Time: "It is ironic that a Republican president has an administration that is more inclusive and more diverse than a so-called liberal-media-elite network."
But NPR executives say Smiley simply would not negotiate after an agent delivered his demands. "We tried to meet, we tried to talk by phone," says Washington lawyer Robert Barnett, who represented NPR. "We were woefully unsuccessful. . . . I have been doing this 30 years, and I have never had an experience like this. I was disappointed because I wanted to make a deal, and more important my client wanted to make a deal."
Says Smiley: "What NPR is apparently upset about is not that I would not negotiate, but that I wouldn't acquiesce. I do not do my best work in chains and shackles. For black kids and brown kids yet unborn, I felt I had to say no. They were being disrespectful."
(jump)
Smiley wanted not only to own the program but to control the rebroadcast rights, which NPR says is a violation of its federal funding rules. And Smiley insisted on a $3 million promotion budget, which NPR found absurd since its entire advertising budget is $165,000 -- 80 percent of which, executives say, was spent on Smiley's program in each of the last two years. (NPR spent $138,000 last year on ads in Essence and Black Entertainment magazine.)