Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sources: CMC did not get honorable discharge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:48 AM
Original message
Sources: CMC did not get honorable discharge
Sources: CMC did not get honorable discharge
By Mark D. Faram - Staff writer
Posted : Friday Feb 22, 2008 17:25:51 EST

The former command master chief of Naval Base Kitsap, Wash., was not given an honorable discharge after being convicted of Internet-predator charges in July, as a local newspaper reported, according to Navy sources. Instead, he was given an other-than-honorable discharge, Navy Times has learned.

The Kitsap Sun reported Feb. 16 that former Command Master Chief Edward E. Scott, who was convicted of attempted rape of a child and having immoral communications with a minor and sentenced to nine months in jail, was given an honorable discharge and permitted to retire as an E-8. But Navy sources, speaking anonymously because of privacy laws, told Navy Times that Scott’s discharge as a senior chief information systems technician was not only “other-than-honorable,” but he also received an RE-4 re-enlistment code, barring him from ever returning to duty.

Federal privacy regulations protect the details of every service member’s discharge. In its story reporting that Scott received an honorable discharge, the Kitsap Sun cited “a report confirming Scott’s status that has circulated through the criminal justice system.”

Still, that other-than-honorable discharge does give Scott, who served 25 years on active duty, his military retirement pay as well other retiree benefits. The nature of that discharge also qualifies him for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

VA officials confirmed that for Scott to be stripped of those benefits, his discharge would have had to be “dishonorable or for bad conduct.”


Rest of article at: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/02/navy_scott_discharge_080222w/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC