Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Command sergeant major pleads guilty after sexual contact with subordinate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:41 AM
Original message
Command sergeant major pleads guilty after sexual contact with subordinate
Command sergeant major pleads guilty after sexual contact with subordinate
By Jon Rabiroff, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Friday, December 18, 2009

CAMP CASEY, South Korea — A brief moment of sexual contact between a senior noncommissioned officer and a subordinate sent both soldiers down different roads of guilt and despair.

Command Sgt. Maj. Antonio Holder found himself ostracized by his peers, and his impressive 29-year military career tarnished as he faced a court-martial. His former driver, a specialist, said the May incident left him unable to eat or sleep normally and with scars on his arms that he attributed to self-inflicted wounds resulting from depression. He said he has repeatedly attempted suicide.

Ultimately, Holder pleaded guilty to fraternizing with a subordinate enlisted man and was sentenced to a reduction in rank to E-8 and a formal reprimand, but not before a daylong sentencing hearing Tuesday at Camp Casey that featured dramatic testimony from the two men about how their lives spiraled downward after an incident that began with a graphic sexual discussion.

“It’s hard to respect … my leaders because I don’t know who I can trust,” the former driver testified. “I used to love the Army. Now I do it because I have to.”

Holder said, “I am truly sorry for the hurt, the shame and the embarrassment that I have brought to all. I am here today pleading guilty to take responsibility and be held accountable for my actions.”


Rest of article at: http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=66716
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, uhc, what do you think about this rule? I think it's one
that needs to go the way of the doo-doo bird. Maybe immediate subordinates should be a no-no, but why is fraternization between officers and enlisted such an issue in the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The civilian analogy would be your bosses screwing the help.
It rarely has good consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But if the help works in a different department the boss had no
influence over, why should anyone care?

I hate to see people being demoted or kicked out because of personal relationships after having invested so much time. I think sometimes people worry about the wrong things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. In this particular case the Command Sergeant Major goes anywhere he wants.
Fraternization between Officer and Enlisted has always been on the "no no" list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC