Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Officials: Corps beat 2007 recruiting goal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:57 AM
Original message
Officials: Corps beat 2007 recruiting goal


Drill instructor Sgt. Robert Donathan, 1st Recruit Training Battalion, Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island, S.C., “encourages” a poolee to sound-off.


Officials: Corps beat 2007 recruiting goal
By John Hoellwarth - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Oct 6, 2007 8:46:35 EDT

For a little while there, even the commandant had his doubts about whether the Corps could grow the active-duty ranks by 5,000 Marines in the nine months following a December 2006 Defense Department announcement that the service would have to swell to 184,000 Marines by the end of the fiscal year on its way to 202,000 through 2011.

In a May 17 letter to all the Corps’ generals, Commandant Gen. James Conway warned that the growth “is not progressing according to plan” and admonished them to redouble their retention efforts and limit administrative separations wherever possible.

It worked. Within days of crossing into the new fiscal year, Corps officials announced Oct. 4 that they’d managed to exceed the target growth by 2,000 Marines, bringing the Corps’ current active-duty end strength to 186,000 by the time fiscal 2007 ended Sept. 30.

During a briefing Oct. 4 at the Pentagon, Manpower and force structure officials said the excess growth achieved in 2007 doesn’t necessarily mean the Corps intends to cross the 202,000 finish line sooner than originally projected. The plan is still to have 189,000 Marines by the end of fiscal 2008; 194,000 by the end of fiscal 2009; 199,000 by the time fiscal 2011 starts Oct. 1, 2010; and 202,000 by the following September’s end.

One recruiting official said the Corps exceeded its mission of shipping 35,576 Marine hopefuls — roughly 2,600 more than projected before the growth announcement — to boot camp during fiscal 2007. It happened, in part, by putting 400 more recruiters in the country’s high schools and strip malls, and there are plans to add another 200 in fiscal 2008.

More recruiters should lead to more recruits, which would require barracks construction at the Corps’ basic training depots, which would increase the boot camps’ through-put capacity, which would strain the staff at military occupational specialty schools, Marine officials said.


Rest of article at: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2007/10/marine_recruiting_goal_071005/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. total BS . . .
obscene bonuses and lowering of standards - that is what it is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maq Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lower standards add some of your own
1. less education...NO high school required
2. age waivers...Real old farts can re-up...prior service
3. medical waivers...missing kidneys, arms, digits, legs all considered.
4. criminal waivers....goons and gang members welcome
5. obese most welcome...Marines have a great weightloss program
6.
7.
8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maq Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. STOP LOSS
I just notice that sentence "Administrative discharge".

Maximum use of the Stop Loss authority of the Brass. Once they have you, you ain't getting out. Brings me to the thought....Is a Marine in the Brig still counted as a warm body for statistcal purposes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. well . . . if criminal behavior is accepted once they are a part of the miltary
then why rule out criminals in the first place.

I remember Project 100,000 back in the late 60's and what a success that was (read sarcasm). Reducing standards to meet recruiting goals. HS Education? Who cares. Just get those numbers up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. They must be counting DEP poolees.
High school wannabes that want to get laid during their senior year in high school, no doubt.

This country has gone off its rockers when they let recruiters on to high school campuses.
It used to be fairly common to see them on college campuses, but not in high school.

I don't know when this changed, but it has to be stopped.
This is an act of militarization of our youth.
And it is immoral.

These kids are too young to appreciate the impact of the decisions they are making.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. NCLB has a provision that your personal info will be given to
recruiters unless you opt out.

The Army had contracted with a firm up in Wakefield, MA to mine the data; I don't know how that's going these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYVet Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Any recruiter wanting to have a serious talk to a minor student
has to have permission from the parents of that student.


As for being too young, we allow 18 year old kids to smoke and vote. Both of those decisions can also have a serious impact on their future.


I also am insulted by the insinuation that the reason a young man or woman joins the delayed entry program is to get laid. When I joined the DEP, I already had a girlfriend and I would like to assume that so do most of the young men and women joining the military.


Before I joined the military I was one of those quiet and shy kids who would not engage in a debate or stand up for myself. After I joined, I gained the self confidence I needed and think that the military was one of the best things that happened to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC