Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taking on The Pledge: Author Examines Press reaction to Newdow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:05 PM
Original message
Taking on The Pledge: Author Examines Press reaction to Newdow
http://www.enterprisenews.com/entertainment/x450927368


Ron Bishop recently published a book that examines how the mainstream press dismisses eccentric people such as Michael Newdow, whose quest to remove the words “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

“Taking on the Pledge” is a critique on how the mainstream press operates, using Newdow as an example, Bishop told The Community News.
In the first chapter of his book, Bishop compares the media’s treatment of Newdow with the way Vietnam and Iraq war protesters were treated.

Bishop said in his book that journalists portrayed Newdow as an “erratic outsider who had the audacity to challenge one of this nation’s most revered rituals in a time of national crisis.”

. . .


“He has a very eclectic personality. He’s very interesting and articulate,” Bishop said. “What happens with the mainstream press is when they find somebody like Newdow, they marginalize him. What’s so interesting about his story is he managed to push back and get on the agenda.”


. . .

“He does feel – and I almost share his concerns about this – that these expressions of religion in public life are beyond what the Constitutional framers envisioned,” Bishop said. “The (Founding Fathers) were deists at best, not particularly religious people who believed God and state were separate. He was just trying to clarify those boundaries a little bit.”



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-11-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Was this irony intentional, I wonder?
Edited on Fri Apr-11-08 04:01 AM by onager
From the SIXTH paragraph of the article: “What happens with the mainstream press is when they find somebody like Newdow, they marginalize him.

But in the VERY FIRST SENTENCE of the article, how is Newdow described? Ron Bishop recently published a book that examines how the mainstream press dismisses eccentric people such as Michael Newdow...

To me, "eccentric" is the guy ranting about the end of the world from a soapbox. It immediately puts the subject on roughly the same level as store-front psychics or Ouija board fans.

It's a wink-wink, nudge-nudge notice to the reader that it's perfectly OK to laugh at this crackpot, since we Big-Time Pro Journalists are certainly laughing at him.

Newdow is both a doctor and a lawyer. But from some of the MSM articles about him, you'd think he was just some ECCENTRIC crank who lives in a basement and spends all his time attacking God with frivolous lawsuits.

I guess the 9th Circuit judge who sided with Newdow, Alfred Goodwin, must be uber-eccentric. Despite him being a solid conservative Republican and a Reagan appointee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. "in a time of national crisis"? Huh?
He started the case in March 2000 - oh, look: "Defendants the Congress of the United States of America; the United States of America; and William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States ..."

What was the 'national crisis'? That computers were still working after Y2K?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Eccentric means "off center."
I don't necessarily read it as a negative.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC