Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MORE SANCTIMONIOUS RELIGION ON THE HILL:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:05 PM
Original message
MORE SANCTIMONIOUS RELIGION ON THE HILL:
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 06:06 PM by and-justice-for-all
E-newsletter from: http://www.americanatheist.org/

KEY RELIGIOUS RIGHT LAWMAKER ADMITS TO AFFAIR WITH EX-STAFFER.
Sen John Ensign Is Latest Hypocrite: Do As I Say...

He is a key religious right operative on Capitol Hill, a lawmaker
with possible presidential ambitions, and a deceitful hypocrite.

Meet Sen. John Ensign, a Republican senator from Nevada, and a
sanctimonious blowhard with a staunch "family values" voting record
who opposes abortion rights, wants to re-instate teacher-led prayer
in public schools, and steps up to the nearest podium to denounce
other public officials who engage in private sexual misconduct.
He is also active in the Promise Keepers movement, and according to
one news report, "resists temptation" by not being alone in a room
with a woman other than his wife. Now, the spotlight is on Ensign
who admitted Tuesday that he engaged in an extra-marital affair
with a woman who had served on his campaign. staff. According to a
spokesperson, Ensign and the unidentified staffer carried on their
tryst between December 2007 and August 2008. Her husband worked in
Ensign's Capitol Hill office at the time.

"Last year I had an affair," declared Sen. Ensign in a statement to
news media. "I violated the vows of my marriage. It is the worst
thing I have ever done in my life. If there was ever anything in
my life I could take back, this would be it."

Ensign's wife, Darlene, dutifully released her own spin-control
statement, saying that she and her husband had "come to a
reconciliation." The couple have three children.

It is not clear why the Senator, who has been mentioned as a
possible candidate for the 2012 GOP presidential race, admitted
to the wrong-doing, although there are unconfirmed reports of a
blackmail threat. What makes this latest revelation of misconduct
by a leading public official noteworthy, though, is Ensign's staunch
social conservatism and penchants for denouncing others who have
committed similar peccadilloes. In the midst of the imbroglio over
Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky, for instance, the Nevada Republican
loudly denounced the president's actions and describe the affair as
"an embarrassing moment for the country," adding "I think we have
to feel very sad for the American people and Hillary and Chelsea."
Ensign demanded that Mr. Clinton resign from office and said "I came
to that conclusion recently and frankly it's because of what he put
the whole Cabinet through and what he has put the country through..."

At the time, Ensign was in a hotly-contested race with incumbent
Harry Reid. The brash challenger said that the Clinton affair
"could have a dramatic effect on Democrats like (President Nixon's
resignation following the Watergate break-in) had on Republicans
in 1974." During the campaign, Ensign hammered away at the Clinton
scandal, and accused Mr. Reid of weakness when it came to denouncing
libertine politicians and sexual hanky-pank.

Despite losing to Reid, Ensign later won a seat in the U.S. Senate
where he quickly established credentials as a water-bearer for
religious right groups. The Christian Coalition "voter guide"
gave him a 100% favorable rating; and at the congressional well,
Ensign was quick to denounce any hint of sexual misconduct, even when
it involved fellow Republicans. He towed the line on hot-button
political issues, voting against abortion rights for women,
opposing same-sex domestic partnership benefits, and coming out
strongly in defense of teacher-led unison prayer in public schools.
Sen. Ensign also emerged as a supporter of Sam Alito and John
Roberts for confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States.
When it came to legislation having to do with the Establishment
Clause separation of government and religion, Ensign earned a zero
percent rating from the state-church watchdog group Americans United.

John Ensign is also a key member of a shadowy, Washington, DC
religious cult that over the years has operated under a battery
of names and disguises. They include, according to a March 2003
expose by Harper's Magazine reporter Jeffrey Sharlett, National
Committee for Christian Leadership, the International Foundation,
the Fellowship Foundation, and Fellowship House. To members
and informed outsiders, the group is simply "the Family," and
maintains a sprawling house/retreat in a quiet Arlington, Virginia
neighborhood. There is much praying, and much talk about what
amounts to theocratic government. The group's $10 million annual
budget comes from a handful of wealthy donors, and its only public
activity is the National Prayer Breakfast. The group also conducts
"prayer warrior" meetings in the Pentagon. The Harper's expose
lives at http://www.harpers.org/archive/2003/03/0079525 .

This certainly is not the first time that a leading politician
--especially one with impeccable religious-right credentials -- has
engaged in hypocritical conduct that speaks less to their public
religious sensibilities that it does to the slogan, "Do as I say,
not as I do." Mr. Ensign joins the ranks of Rep. Mark Foley; "Larry
"wide stance" Craig; "Crusader Eliot Spitzer, the former New York
Governor who made his political career as a foe of corruption in
high place; and, of course, a retinue of philandering preachers
including Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart and Rev. Tim Haggard along
with an undisclosed number of pedophile clergy.

No doubt Sen. Ensign, who loudly demanded the resignation of Bill
Clinton, will now engage in a media rain-dance that we have come
to expect whenever public figures -- celebrities, politicians,
super-star athletes -- stumble in their careers. He will "seek
counseling," give lipserve to apologies, engage the assistance
of a "spiritual advisor" and then once again step up to the
pulpit or podium taking about "the healing process." Indeed, the
American people are a forgiving folk. We insist on this ritual of
self-humiliation, asking for that very forgiveness, and then smile
when the former wrong-doer basks in the bright light of redemption.
The only problem is that no one mentions the hypocrisy. Sen. Ensign
is full of prescriptions, prohibitions and rules that others must
follow lest they slip into the clutches of sin. In his case, though,
this is just another example of being a hypocrite, and living by
a credo that declares: "Do as I say, not as I do."
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's really rather simple: the more someone tries to legislate "morality"
the more sanctimonious and judgmental they are, the bigger possibility that they're hiding perversions, sexual obsession and all-around deviance. Think about it: they're ashamed of something within themselves and think an external solution like crazy fundie religion is gonna save them. It never works--does it, Larry Craig, J Edgar Hoover, Jimmy Swaggart, Ted Haggard, David Vitter, et al???

And now Ensign is trying to get out in front of it right now, hoping it's not gonna affect his 2012 run for prez. Well, I got news for ya, Johnny-boy: if you were a liberal and had never pointed your finger at Clinton or anyone else for being perverted, you might have been forgiven. But since you're a right-wing hypocritical toad, you don't get a pass on this one!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "The louder he spoke of his Honor, the faster we counted our spoons"
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. They want NO extra-marital sex or abortions for anyone.
Unless it's for themselves under their
own mitigating circumstances.

I hate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But if *they* do it there's a damn good explanation.
Notice they'll never seriously try to ban divorce or make infidelity a felony (arguably two actual threats to marriage and the family unit). It's because they might actually be impacted by it, which is why they'll stick to fighting against gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC