|
Edited on Fri Oct-17-08 06:15 PM by politicasista
Haven't posted here in a while, because I didn't have anything intelligent to add to the conversation (Still obtuse about the Bailout aka financial mess), and since Election Day is almost here, it doesn't do much good to complain or moan about what's being said out "there" and bringing it in here anymore (i.e. Chicken Little mentality), so I just K&R or comment in any Pro-Kerry, Pro-Obama/Biden thread to stay involved.
I wanted to comment in the thread about the BG article talking about Kerry being on a narrow stage 4 years later, but didn't feel like it was anything positive, so I just left it alone.
I went around blogs outside of DU, Kos to see what the reaction was to the Obama/Biden ticket (:thumbsup:), and the DNC Convention (:thumbsup:).
I know I have a habit of hearing or reading too much into what was said, but I was watching the DNC After Party show on TVOne (urban media outlet). The network didn't cover Kerry's speech, but it was one of the sound bites at the end of the show (No comment on BET :thumbsdown:). During one of the roundtable segments, each was discussing Obama, the Clintons, and the state of the Democratic Party as a whole. However, when comparisons of 2004 and 2008 was mentioned, one of the guests, Dr. Juilanne Malveaux (Suzanne's cousin) mentioned the tired line that people "held their noses and voted for John Kerry, only because they thought he was better than Bush." Not one person in that room refuted her comment or defended the senator. Not one person (and still hasn't) mentioned that AA turnout was higher in 04.
At first, I was thinking that she put that out there to make it seem like Kerry was just another irrelevant Democratic senator that "lost" the presidency, but after hearing her and Dr. Cornel West diss Obama's acceptance speech (same reasons people dissed Kerry's 04 speech--no mention of the Civil Rights movement, etc.), it's no wonder we haven't made it far until now (too many egos fed).
On the flipside, I found a blog (music, entertainment, politics) that had all the speeches, and the blogger herself said how proud she was to have supported Kerry in 04 and loved his speech (still don't hear that too often). There were others enjoyed it. At Essence.com, Roland Martin (from CNN) noticed, a couple of people did too and asked for the YouTube link since it wasn't on the networks. They too were impressed. Even a friend (no, not that other one. :)), who loved Kerry of '71, but lukewarm as candidate, loved the speech. When Obama came out (after Biden's acceptance speech) and mentioned everyone's speech but Kerry's, she e-mailed the Obama campaign, hoping they will remind Obama not to forget about Kerry or his speech. Oddly enough, I never saw that as a slight, especially with the smiling exchanges in the end. I figured either Obama got caught up in the moment or he and/or Kerry probably wanted it that way (gotta make sure others are satisfied).
To make the long story short, have been hearing lots of revisionist history as it relates to Obama's historic run and Obama himself (outside of DU and the liberal blogs, it's just like GD/GDP). Tried sending a couple e-mails but to no avail.
I am slowly coming to the conclusion that people have made their minds up about Kerry and his campaign, and no positive facts will change that. If they really believe or think that he was off-putting, ran a horrible campaign, not tough enough to fight back (SBV, Ohio), or didn't excite people, so be it. They are still brainwashed with media spin, and their opinions will not change :(. It's not fair to Obama to put this all in black and white because he is a unity person and wants to be the president for all of us, not just one race, but I guess the truth will come one day.
I am not one that thinks Kerry will fade from history because he isn't in the top (or second top) job (though he would have made a fine president), and I don't know what Obama has in store for him come 2009, but I am hopeful that history will be kind to the good senator. America likes a winner or likes to be a part of a winning ticket, but America likes to treat "losers" as the opposite (what you didn't do). I do hope that history (or America itself) will remember the good senator as someone as a respected, likable (some say charismatic), hardworking person that almost beat a wartime president, took the high road (noticed that Obama is praised for that, but not Kerry), wasn't just another lesser of two evils, helped make the country even better, and "discovered" a young leader along the way. :)
I understand that people will agree/disagree, but this is all from poli's neck of the woods.
And if I said anything wrong about the senator in the past, apologies.
:patriot:
edit for smiley
|