JK's speaking on c-span2

right now for 10 minutes on ANWAR.

Speaking well and passionately. :loveya:

The Rethugs are assh*les. Their arguments are full of holes and Kerry is catching them on it.

Not only on the wildlife issue, but the impact of setting a precedent on how the Senate operates. It's too bad that Inoye is ignoring this argument. As a Democrat the Senate procedure issue should make him vote with the other Democrats.

to give Inouye's claim that the Alaskan pipeline helped the caribou a big ol' head scratch. That's some scientific analysis.

a few of those too. :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:

It takes some kind of guts to stand up to these bullies. Barbara Boxer's hanging tough too.

How much of an ass is Trent Lott????

Woke up too late dagnabit!

Is Stevens still having a cow?

Catch up here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=273x19109

Vote's at 1:10.

I missed it, too. Should have come home a little bit earlier. *sigh* I really miss seeing JK on tv, and I have dialup, so watching c-span videos online isn't exactly fun either . . .:cry:

Goodbye ANWR... :cry:

And it was so close: 51-49! :cry:

Landrieu
Akaka
Inouye

What's with Hawaii???

sense.

Is there any oil around Hawaii?

Check out this link:

http://hawaiiislandjournal.com/2005/02a05b.html

Landreiu, Akaka and Inouye.

i missed it but would like to watch him.

also, i would love to watch Ted Stevens going crazy from yesterday also.

if anyone has a link please post.

A nice and gracious speech:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r109:1:./temp/~r109n22P4T:e94809:

Here is Sen. Ted Stevens weird rant about Kerry from 3/15/05. (Please give to help the mentally ill. It might be the only way to save Sen. Stevens:

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/r109query.html

Go here, Enter Kerry as the search word
Then Select Sen. Stevens
Look for the record on March 15
The select Page: S2709

If the economics are really as borderline as Kerry and others are saying, one tool that organizations such as the Sierra Club could use is to publicize NOW that they will ask their members to boycott the companies involved. In most areas, there is more than on brand of gas available. If say, XXXXX* drills, boycott XXXXX*. If the various environmental groups find that they can influence even 5% of the total population and shift their usage that would be an incredible impact on that company's bottom line. (I don't think the other side can match this - buy XXXXX* they have the guts to drill in the refuge.

This should not be done by a politician but by an interest group

* didn't want to use a real company's name