We were just discussing in another thread about the news blackout of John Kerry. I was saying that over all, PBS has not been the worst of the offenders -- they have given him coverage over the last year (not a lot, but some) but that their newsmaker interview with John McCain creates a gap. They need to interview John Kerry about HIS Iraq plan, or at least show excerpts of his speech. His came out two weeks before McCain's and describes yet another alternative, a compelling alternative to the current disasterous "stay the course" plan. Since PBS can be slow, the opportunity has not been lost yet. If we do this, everyone should write in their own words so that the News Hour doesn't think this is some orchestrated effort from Kerry partisans (I consider us to be independent minded citizens who come together because we admire JK. We are not paid staffers).
Here is the link to PBS:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/letters.htmlI also will give you the link to John McCain's interview, which was very interesting and less accusatory than what he did on the Senate floor. I've also included some excerpts which won't totally annoy you. My point is to show how even McCain, after I was so incensed with him Thursday, was able to convey his message very well, since the PBS format allows enough time for intelligent discussion.
www://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/congress/july-dec05/mccain_11-10.html
JIM LEHRER: You said several weeks ago you no longer had confidence in Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. Has anything happened to change that?
SEN. JOHN McCAIN: No. But I am not in any way attempting to confront or conflict with Secretary Rumsfeld because as long as he enjoys the confidence of the president, he will be there, and I need to work with him and the other people in the Pentagon to try to help when this conflict that is so important. I think it's more important than the Vietnam conflict.
JIM LEHRER: More important than Vietnam. In what way?
SEN. JOHN McCAIN: Well, when we left Vietnam and came home and Ho Chi Minh or his followers didn't come after us.
I think if we lose here, you're going to see a factionalization of Iraq and the kind of training and place where Muslim extremism flourishes. And I think if you look at bin Laden's statements and Zarqawi's and others that they will be coming after us.
JIM LEHRER: You know as well as anyone what the opinion polls show about the American people's feelings about the whole Iraq enterprise at this point. They are down on it, and they are losing support for it. What's the cause of that? Why don't they get it, what you just said?
SEN. JOHN McCAIN: I think there are several reasons. One, of course, is heightened expectations and continued predictions of good news, thing were going to get better after they voted the first time, things were going to get better after they captured Saddam, things were going to get better, instead of giving a more hardened and realistic viewpoint and outlook say, look, it's going to be long, tough, very difficult, but explaining why we can win.
So I think dashed expectations are one, and two are American casualties which are almost one in the same. When they see the crawl across the bottom line of their television screen of people dying, and I'm sure that there's someone watching say, well, we lost 58,000 in the Vietnam War, it is just not the same. It's just not the same. So that's eroded it.
And also in the minds of many Americans there's no clear cut design for a victory/withdrawal. And I said emphatically today, if you withdraw before you have a secure environment, that's a recipe for disaster.
JIM LEHRER: So you have no second thoughts at all about the wisdom of going to war?
SEN. JOHN McCAIN: I have second thoughts every time I hear of a brave young soldier of ours from Arizona who gives his or her life -- every single time.
So what do you say? I'm going to do a letter right now. And since I tape the show every day, I'll be able to report back if Jim Lehrer decides to do it.