Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Please, please

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 01:44 PM
Original message
Please, please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent. Thanks for posting! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenndar Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yay! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Really great responses. My, my...persistant leftie there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, there are a few
highly adamant strains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I needed that reminder, not too long ago.
Everyone gets the RW talking points and the lazy media talking points in their heads from time to time. (I just chalk it up to being human. We are all vulnerable to the memes that are going around. Sigh!)

Sen. Kerry did not vote to go to war in 2002. He voted for steps to be taken that, had they been done might have averted war. He also voted to uphold the right of the US to defend itself, if that was needed and shown by actual facts. That got distorted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting note about the IWR argument.
OK, the IWR issue is always being brought up by people who want to blame the Democrats who voted for the IWR for giving Bush a blank check and also to pit Democrats against each other. Byrd made the "blank check" statement back in 2002. Well, here is a recent statement Byrd made regarding another resolution:

December 19, 2005

No President Is Above the Law

Snip...

The President claims a boundless authority through the resolution that authorized the war on those who perpetrated the September 11th attacks. But that resolution does not give the President unchecked power to spy on our own people. That resolution does not give the Administration the power to create covert prisons for secret prisoners. That resolution does not authorize the torture of prisoners to extract information from them. That resolution does not authorize running black-hole secret prisons in foreign countries to get around U.S. law. That resolution does not give the President the powers reserved only for kings and potentates.

http://byrd.senate.gov/newsroom/news_dec/law_for_all.html



Here is the resolution he was referring to:


S.J.RES.23
Title: A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.
Sponsor: Sen Daschle, Thomas A. (introduced 9/14/2001) Cosponsors (1)
Related Bills: H.J.RES.64
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 107-40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY AS OF:
9/14/2001--Passed House, without amendment. (There is 1 other summary)
Authorization for Use of Military Force - Authorizes the President to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations, or persons.

States that this Act is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of the War Powers Resolution.



This is how Congress voted:

Vote Summary

Question: On the Joint Resolution (S.J. Res. 23 )
Vote Number: 281 Vote Date: September 14, 2001, 10:44 AM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Joint Resolution Passed
Vote Counts:
YEAs 98
NAYs 0
Not Voting 2 -- Craig (R-ID), Helms (R-NC)

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00281



By the logic the detractors attach to the IWR, and based on the content of Byrd's statement, a vote for the above resolution gave Bush authorization and made it easier for him to:

spy on Americans, create covert prisons for secret prisoners, authorize the torture of prisoners to extract information from them, authorize running black-hole secret prisons in foreign countries to get around U.S. law.

Clearly, Byrd's statement smacks down that logic. Each of these resolutions granted Bush powers with specific restrictions. Bush has established a pattern of defying Congress and breaking the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. These enablers are just amazing in their toadying arguments
Bush is not a King. He has to obey the rule of law. He does not have the right to unilaterally suspend the civil liberties of Americans. No act passed by Congress can give him this authority, unless it is an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

God bless Sen. Byrd. Now, if only there are a few Republicans of conscience and patriotism who will stand up to this bully and demand accountability.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They has a small window
Edited on Sun Jan-08-06 10:18 PM by ProSense
If the 2006 elections come around without as much, the current Republican members of Congress (not under indictment) will have forfeited the right to call themselves patriots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StoryTeller Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. I posted a thank you message
at the bottom of the discussion. Even with the disagreements, it was such a helpful discussion for me--a lot of things in it were facts I didn't know. So thanks for taking the time on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I saw that. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. Another thing
I just posted an article in GD-P about the war on terror, it's an interesting read: debunking the myth of Bush's competency in that area (his whole approach to it) and its impact on the election. Again, Kerry was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC