DAVENETICS: Could the Libby Rove Scandal Hurt the Dems?

Montauk6

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 10:43 PM
Original message

DAVENETICS: Could the Libby Rove Scandal Hurt the Dems?

It might not be on purpose, but so far, the Dems are playing the Plame scandal just right: Don�t pile on, just let the damage to Rove and Libby happen on its own.

But here�s a scary thought: The whole scandal may end up hurting the Dems and the so-called intellectual elite.

Why?

Find out here: http://davenetics.com/2005/10/could-the-libby-rove-scandel-hurt-the-dems/

Refresh | 0 Recommendations

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Tandalayo_Scheisskopf

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message

1. And what if...

Rove, Libby and Cheney turn out to be Cthulhu, Yog-Sothoth and N'yarlhotep and they rip off their disguises on national TV and eat our brains?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

The Velveteen Ocelot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1

5. You mean they're not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

SoDesuKa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message

2. Damage to the Times

The Times isn't much of a friend to the Left. If they lose credibility, it's no big deal. But even if it were a big deal, the Left will find a way to carry on, with or without the Times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

LittleClarkie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #2

4. They may not be a friend to the left, but they are percieved thus

esp by the Right, and by others I'm sure.

They don't make much distinction. Left is left to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

bullimiami

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message

3. wtf. its time to stand for whats right and stop shivering in your boots.

davenetics? thats the whole problem with these politicians. so worried about what people might think they wont do whats right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Garbo 2004

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message

6. Only if you believe/accept the NYT as a icon of the "left." RWingers

may regard it as such, but they don't believe the NYT is a credible source anyway.

And any discerning lefty who's actually read the NYT for years hardly can believe the paper is a liberal paper.

Any reason why folks who might still believe the corporate media is on their side shouldn't find "their trust in mainstream media has been scarred?" That's a bad thing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

VPStoltz

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message

7. Wasn't Miller considered part of the * propoganda machine.

They can't blame the "liberals" for what she said and did - but they will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Crunchy Frog

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-17-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message

8. Is that article intended as satire?

I find it very funny. I'm just hoping that it isn't being so unintenionally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon May 06th 2024, 04:16 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.