First, stripping is not a "profession". It's an occupation. A profession is an occupation (and its practitioners) that is subject to codes of conduct and discipline for breaches of the code. These days, professions exercise authority assigned to them by the public, i.e. by law, to regulate the practice and practitioners of the profession in the public interest.
Law, medicine, engineering and the like are professions. The services they involve are essential to the public, and the public has an interest in how they are practised. Stripping and performing sexual services for pay, like washing dishes in restaurants and selling advertising, are occupations.
It seems to me that true feminine empowerment will come to its full fruition when seeing a woman as a sexual, exciting, inviting creature doesn't mean disregarding the rest of her. ... It doesn't have to be about power. It can just be about delight."
And men don't have to abuse the women they live with sexually, physically and psychologically. Unfortunately, some of them do. Perhaps we should ignore that reality too. There are lots of realities we could ignore, and just say "it doesn't have to be about pain and poverty and powerlessness, it can be about _______". We should try that. Imagine how nice that imaginary world would be, and how happy and carefree and empowered the women working as strippers in it would be.
Why does a woman become a stripper? Why do I care? Do I care why a man becomes a member of a fundamentalist religious group that propagates ideas I find abhorrent?
Well, yes, I do care. Because if I understand why people do such things, I can work to create the conditions that will be less likely to lead to people doing abhorrent things, and of course to lead to people being victimized and exploited. Other than that: I don't.
Of course, I care more about the conditions that lead to people doing the more abhorrent things done by the men who pay for the services of strippers and prostitutes and by the people who organize the religions that prey on converts. They are the real problems. If it weren't for their vile behaviours, there would be nothing vile for someone else to become complicit in, whether through "choice" or exploitation.
I didn't think feminism was about women thinking alike. I thought it was about women thinking for themselves.Hey, sure. Phyllis Schlafly is a woman. She thinks for herself. Ergo she is a feminist / her choices must be embraced by feminists.
Yeesh.
I suggest we all feel free to think for ourselves, or think we think for ourselves. Demanding that everyone else approve of our actions is really quite another matter.
typo fixed