During the time he was on jury duty he told me "you have to promise not to kill anybody when I tell you about this trial"
http://www.theolympian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060720/NEWS/60720003Hysterectomy case tests protocol issues
Snip-----------------
"The imminent ruling also comes as officials for Providence Centralia say the staff is looking into whether their protocols for doing hysterectomies on young women should be changed. A state Department of Health study in March found that 103, or 14.3 percent, of 720 hysterectomies done at the Centralia facility from 1999 to 2004 were on women ages 30 and younger — one of the highest percentages in the state"
---------------------------------
"The state study shows the majority of young women receiving hysterectomies were those on state aid or who had illegitimate children, Deutscher said."
The outcome of the trial:
$1.57 million award stands in lawsuit over hysterectomy
http://www.theolympian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060729/NEWS/607290366Anyway, my friend-- a black man, tried to get out of this trial, because he knew he was going to be angry. He told them "They used to do that to women in the south, I can't be impartial" (As an aside, my friend has been called up for jury duty 4 times in 6 years) They accepted him anyway. The newspaper articles can't give a depiction of the trial, which upset him as much as he thought it would.
From my friends memory, among other things, the defense tried to say that since the young woman's father was a firefighter and trained in emergency medical care, he should qualify as a second opinion. The women suffered damage not only because of the hysterectomy, but because the way it was performed. My friend said the doctor "forgot" such things as his surgical entry code. The defense did everything they could to show that the young woman was avaricious, and "just" after money.
I asked my friend if they offered a racial breakdown of the hysterectomies, (There wasn't) because there is a significant hispanic population around the area, he said "I was afraid to go there"
He did his best but was appalled. The shear numbers of hysterectomies on young women made him sick. The methods of the defense made him sick. The lack of compassion for the young woman in question made him sick.
The doctor is an orthopedist, and evidently there was some questioning as to the legitimacy of his licensing for the procedure. He is a MD at the Women's center at the hospital.
My friend said another jurist believed everything the defense said, hands down without question and no understanding of what a hysterectomy, much less one with complications means to a woman. The evidence was overwhelming enough to change that jurists mind. I'll have to ask my friend what the "misconduct" was that the young woman's attorney got nailed for.
The whole thing is very scary.