|
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 06:24 PM by Peace Patriot
science BEGAN as philosophy (with the Pythagoreans, the founders of mathematics, geometry, astronomy and a number of other subjects, but who also believed in the mystical properties of numbers, and that the goal of philosophy and science--at that time, one and the same discipline--was salvation of the human soul).
Science, philosophy and religion remain pretty much wedded together until very recent times.
I wish to God (...ahem) that these rightwing nuts were not pushing education into a corner on this matter--forcing it to respond defensively to a given science and humanitarian studies program. I think "intelligent design" should be explored in school curricula, even in science class. (WHERE is the design we see in nature coming from? Us? Some scientific thinkers in biology and physics fear that we are imposing our need for order and design where it does not exist, and are thus making errors as to what is really real.) Also, I think that evolution, like every other scientific idea, SHOULD be taught, not as dogma (as it often is--in tone anyway), but as a theory--one in this case that appears to account pretty well for the facts that we know, but that COULD be supplanted by some OTHER theory, when more facts are known, or new and different perspectives achieved.
What if, tomorrow, aliens arrive from Arcturus and can establish beyond question that they planted life on this planet, and then came back and, at a certain point, infused the gene for sentience into certain species (humans, whales, dolphins and elephants, for instance). I mean, it's not so outlandish. And how then would we have to REVISE the theory of evolution to encompass these new facts? And what about the Arcturians' evolution? Where did THEY come from?
We are on the threshold of discovery that we are not alone among sentient species in the universe. One of the major steps toward that discovery has been taken--the discovery that planetary systems (once thought to be rare) are commonplace among the stars. This hugely increases the odds for sentient life having developed in other places. So, the Arcturian scenario is not so outrageous. And other, less spectacular discoveries might occur--such as the discovery of some sort of life on Mars.
Clearly, we should be trying to think big, not small. We should be LOOKING FOR more comprehensive theories of life. And, among other things, we should be exploring both notions of "intelligent design" and notions of "chaotic plethora" (as has been pretty well established for the early conditions of life on earth--a super-abundance of species). Does "chaotic plethora" TURN INTO "intelligent design"? Or, is our intelligence now DESIGNING evolution?
The wingers may have given us a GIFT with this notion of "intelligent design"--inadvertently. But we can't accept it because they are such nutters--and have the political agenda of oppressing us all.
End of my rant. In the meantime, my support for the separation of church and state is absolute. I side with the rationalists and the scientists, even if they have gone a bit far in thinking that the great cosmos is understandable by current methods, and from our puny little earth perspective on it all. The meddling of religious powermongers, witchburners, inquisitionists, pogromists, dogmatists, fascists, baptizers-by-the-sword, scapegoaters, warmongering crusaders, ignorant assholes and other pious vermin, is about the worst trend we could see come back into our society. Begone, Satan!
|