Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Larry Johnson: "... it's really because Goss is in trouble."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:08 PM
Original message
Larry Johnson: "... it's really because Goss is in trouble."
Edited on Fri May-05-06 03:14 PM by understandinglife
Porter Goss Resigns

As soon as I heard the news on my car radio, I hurried home to share my opinion that -- unlike the talking heads' speculation that it's part of the WH shakeup -- it's really because Goss is in trouble. I also find it remarkable that there was NO leak of this shocking resignation. Taters posted this alert in the story below: CIA Director Porter Goss Resigns, AP, Friday, May 5, 2006; 2:18 PM -- WASHINGTON -- CIA Director Porter Goss resigned unexpectedly Friday, leaving behind a spy agency still battling to recover from the scars of intelligence failures before America's worst terrorist attack and faulty information that formed the U.S. rationale for invading Iraq. ...

Here are what I believe are among the factors:

1) Josh Marshall, who's been following the Duke Cunningham / Abramoff et al. scandals closely, wrote this following Bush's announcement this morning:

The talking heads on CNN were speculating whether Goss's departure might be part of Josh Bolten's 'new blood' shake up in the Bush administration. I don't suppose it has anything to do with the fact that Goss is neck deep in the Wilkes-Corruption-and-Hookers story that's been burbling in the background all week. We don't know definitely why Goss pulled the plug yet. But the CIA Director doesn't march over to the White House and resign, effective immediately, unless something very big is up. (Point of pride ed. note: TPMmuckraker has been on top of this story all week.)


<clip>

Much more at the link:

http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/05/porter_goss_res.html


As the folk at Think Progress note that according to CNN the Pentagon dudes were shocked, as in totally surprised:

<clip>

The Defense Department has representatives there and, according to sources, none of the people at that meeting had any advance word that Porter Goss was going to be tendering his resignation.

So it indicates the sudden nature that this took place, and again it just fuels the speculation of what the real backstory is here. And again, nobody here seems to know. They are all all just really surprised, they had no idea this was coming. And they’re really just wondering what was actually behind it.



"backstory" is an interesting innuendo, :evilgrin: don't ya thunk ....


Never Forget: George W. Bush willfully violated National Security to cover-up his willful launch of a war of aggression and illegal occupation of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds more likely than Russert's hard sell that Negroponte wanted own man
at CIA. If that were the case, seems there would have been some rumblings for a while before the resignation. SOMEBODY has Goss by the nads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I agree. You beat me to the post on this. Russert was fed lies. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. I don't know if Russert knows they're lies, but he does swallow whatever
they tell him to believe. He so loves the access, and is so paranoid of being labeled a liberal, that he pretty much regurgitates whatever the White House stuffs down his gullet. Matthews will at least occasionally scold the Republicans. I don't know if Russert has said one critical thing since he pegged Cheney on the WMD lies in 2004. Two years is a long time to have your head up somebody else's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. well, it did seem like a complete surprize to all-including the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. So very interesting!
gotta know more:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. One talking head on CNN
mentioned this VERY BRIEFLY and then was cut off to move to the next talking head. I'm pretty sure whoever that was (female) hit the nail on the head. All the talk about Goss "not fitting in" at the CIA... or the President being upset that "a whole generation of CIA veterans at the top levels have left in the last year plus because of the *goss-lings* running around the CIA", blah, blah, blah... just simply doesn't ring true. Bush sent him over there WITH THE INTENTION that Goss would gut the CIA. Rummy and Darth Cheney told Shrubya that it had to be done... and Rummy is building an alternate intelligence gathering agency inside the military that will provide both operational intelligence and policy intelligence (cooked to Rummys way of thinking, of course). No need for a CIA that has some professionals left that might actually uncover the true facts and, god help us, leak them if the administration ignored them. Goss was doing EXACTLY what the evil cabal in the White House wanted.

Now a scandal with Duke Cunningham and late night poker parties with prostitutes... that' much more believable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. yes, it is this shadow Rummy intell operation that should concern people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. and also-recall yesterday Rummy said he was NOT in the intell business!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. and Lou Dobbs said Rummy has the biggest budget for Intell. Lou was
insulted that no one went after Rummy for that comment.


Rummy considers himself a 'consumer' of intell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. Another "tip of the iceberg" story. It's going to get....
...much more interesting, sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. "Bush sent him over there WITH THE INTENTION that Goss would gut the CIA."
Exactly.

He's out there in a flash because someone's got some pictures or/and has provided some details on Goss's pok(h)er skills ... :)


If You're pro-Bu$h, You're Anti-America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. I wonder if those prostitutes were female or male? Were they
all of legal age?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Porter Goss being gone gives me the kind of satisfaction that Rove being
gone will give me, and that the Libby indictment/resignation gave me. These are the rotten henchmen of a criminal cabal. They are like the enforcers in the Mafia. They destroy people, ruin their careers, make their lives hell, and even kill them, or order up their killing, on behalf of the gang leaders. We still don't know who they may have gotten killed in the Brewster-Jennings network, but, at the very least, they put many CIA covert agents and contacts in great jeopardy of being killed, and destroyed a WMD counter-proliferation network that had been twenty years in the making. They blackmail, they smear, they run black ops against people, they torture, they "render," they run secret prisons; they've got private contractor death squads in Iraq (and god knows where else); and they arranged the slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent people in Iraq, for their criminal bosses.

When the criminal bosses fall, the whole country--and the whole world--will cheer. Meanwhile, my broken heart cannot help but jump for joy that Porter Goss--purger of the honest and the good and the courageous and the truthful--is gone, and can do no more harm.

I agree with you, Lapfog: It was Porter Goss's job to FINISH the work of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Libby, Rove and the White House Iraq Group, in outing Plame and Brewster-Jennings--that is, to get rid of anybody who thinks that it is their job to prevent war, not to manufacture it. That's what Porter Goss was intent upon, and I can only cheer that he is such a stupido as to get caught with his pants down--if that IS the immediate cause of his sudden resignation. It means that he was probably equally imcompetent at running Rumsfeld's hit squads within the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Feel no satisfaction. Goss had a shred of honesty in him. Seriously
For the past several months Cheney's been pissed at Goss for not following the party line on Iran's "imminent" development of nuclear weapons. CIA reports have been clinging frustratingly close to the facts at a time when America really needs to invade someone. Badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Point taken, Bucky! There's also a developing theory
at
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2608831

that Porter Goss was hired BECAUSE they knew he was sleeze/dirty, and exposure would help Rumsfeld discredit/downgrade the CIA, so Rumsfeld's dirty black ops on Iran can proceed. Goss out, and the CIA besmirched, serves Rumsfeld's purposes.

I tend to doubt there is much honesty in Porter Goss, but it may be that his weakness and incompetence permitted the honest intel people to counter Rumsfeld's lies and dirty tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. That's right! Some CIA reports dismissed any immediate Iran threats
Edited on Fri May-05-06 06:46 PM by Canuckistanian
And some agency spokesmen directly contradicted a State Dept. report, IIRC.

But that was a few weeks back, and it didn't seem to cause any big stir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Right. It pissed the White House off, but they fired him for the hookers
Republicans are funny that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. "the scars of intelligence failures"
CIA -Scapegoat for no WMD in Iraq

The Bush Regime were planning upon invading Iraq before the 911 Attacks. The plan needed a solid
reason. WMDs in Iraq was decided upon to be that reason. The 911 Attacks.provided the motivation for the Invasion of Iraq. CIA Intell Reports were cherry picked, taken to The Office of Special Plans and crafted for the cause. Ex. CIA Director G. Tenet went along with the scheme. When the Iraqi Invasion was completed an Insurgency that was ignored by Rumfailed and the Generals rose up which prolonged the take over of Iraq bu the US and the UK. As it gradually became obvious that Iraq had no WMDs. the Bush Regime laid that failure of Intell on the CIA. The CIA was expected to shoulder that blame.

Many if the Rank and File and some former CIA members angrily objected to this scapegoating..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's wiser for Goss to remain silent for quitting reasons, allow the media
to make it's claims rather then facing why he made "false" statements to begin with...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Trying to keep track of all of
these scandals is making my head explode. This truly is a circus. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I was thinking the same thing.
It's hard to keep track of all of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Somebody has the goods on Goss.
A little CIA payback, I think. Interesting that Goss denied the allegations earlier this week, but suddenly resigns today. I think there is hard evidence that proves he was involved. Remember, we just heard about the Watergate hotel records were just subpeoned....hmmmmm.

Of course, our Washington media plays stupid on the real reason, but have moved on to focus on poor Pat Kennedy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Bingo, Gross pissed off too many rank and file CIA.?
Paybacks are hell.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. He was hated with a passion among careerists
A large number of them resigned. Some decided to go with the flow.

But they all hate the crassly political moves of Goss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I have felt that for some time, that the CIA would get its revenge
on the whole lot of them. Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Yep, me too.
The damgage to the CIA and to intelligence gathering itself will be impaired for years.

They're probably pissed, to make an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Deaths of agents, damage to the networks, vilified as the
reason we went erroneously to war. Trying to wipe out most of the agency and transfer intelligence gathering to the pentagon.

Yep, I think they are more that a bit pissed off.

And of course the military is none too happy with BushCo either.

Never underestimate the power of the bureaucracy, many consider it to be the fourth branch of the US govt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
42. Maybe they slipped a mickey in PK's evening water bottle
just to have something or someone else to focus on. Oh, sorry, it's that hat I'm wearing again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Poker Parties" are a very convenient mechanism for passing cash
to "lucky" players. Some high rollers just play their hands poorly, and an average hand wins. Other players prefer to "get lucky" the Poke 'er parties, but Abramoff's bribes work with either type. Players at both games will go down when Abramoff deals for his own gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. If someone is winning at a private (illegal in most states)
poker party (even a few hundred dollars), there are still TAXES that must be paid on the winnings. There is a nice convenient form the IRS has for declaring just such winnings. Not paying the taxes (or declaring the winnings) can land one in serious hot water (even if the gambling activity itself is illegal). Of course, the opposite is true as well. if you LOSE at a private home game (or internet or whatever), you can still declare the loss on your taxes as well (such a loss must be backed by documentation and said documentation is NOT an admission of guilt in committing the illegal act). At least, that's what I've been told.

I'm wondering if the IRS is hot on this case?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Right - Al Capone got busted for tax evasion.
I doubt the current IRS would initiate any investigation of one of their own, but the money that passed from bribers to bribees through these "games" must be reported according to the law, and once the money trail is documented the tax records would be confirmation of the bribes (er, lucky winnings), or else the non-reporting would be evidence of another criminal act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Steve Soto: "Party On, Porter - Why Are You Leaving So Suddenly?"
<clip>

Folks, this was a sudden move, as if the man just found out he was political and legal roadkill. I saw no clips from the usual sources that anything was coming on this, especially after Goss denied late last week that he was implicated in the stories about Brent Wilkes's hooker parties for members of Congress, one of whom was now a high-ranking intelliegence official.

There are two immediate thoughts here. First, there is no way Harry Reid will allow Bush to get a nomination through for a replacement between now and November, without making the Administration walk through fire on intelligence reform, the Roberts' Phase Two inquiry, the Plame case, and John Negroponte's pathetic performance as the Director of National Intelligence. In fact, Reid may simply take the position that "we'll wait to see who controls these committees" after November.

Secondly, without Goss there to stop the book for security reasons, does George Tenet have an easier time now getting his tell-all book to the market in mid-October as he is currently planning?

<clip>

More at:

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/007576.php


Clever and clear, as always, that Steve Soto!


Be The Bu$h Opposition - 24/7 -- hey, it's even getting to be fun ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
54. Tenet's writing a book?
There's a surprise. Well, maybe not such a surprise but the timing is very interesting.

That Medal of Freedom didn't buy much time, did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
motocicleta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. You are crapping me
I hadn't heard about this resignation, so I immediately flipped to cnn.com to make sure I was reading this right. What do I see? Big picture of little Kennedy, red flag, Kennedy admits a problem!!!! Small side story: CIA chief resigns, due to mutual understanding with President. Nothing about any controversy or trouble, obviously a much smaller story than some Kennedy's personal issues.

Oh my god!! I'm kinda the last person to yell the MSM sucks, because I don't even have a TV, so I don't really see it all the time, but really ... how freaking effed up is the MSM? What a complete joke. If you haven't done it yet, you must get rid of your TV, and convince everyone you know to do the same. I am becoming further and further convinced that it is the only way to get through this crap - some sort of voluntary opt out of the corruption of our culture from the MSM.

Sorry I'm so riled, but this is just unbelievable. Yes, I know I am a rube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I understand your disgust, to say the least.
We haven't watched teevee for more than 10 years.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Think Progress' primer on the connection between Goss and the Cunningham
<clip>

For more than a decade, Cunningham-linked defense contractor Brent Wilkes curried favor with lawmakers and CIA officials by hosting weekly parties at lavish hospitality suites at the Watergate and Westin hotels in Washington. Guests would gamble, socialize, and sometimes receive prostitutes; according to Harper’s magazine, the festivities “began early with poker games and degenerated” into what one source described

Link to the full primer:

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/05/breaking-cia-director-porter-goss-resigns/


Thanks, Think Progress!!!


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Harpers: "Red Lights On Capitol Hill" -- for more context ...
Posted on Thursday, April 27, 2006. By Ken Silverstein.

SourcesThe Wall Street Journal reported today that indicted former California Congressman Randall "Duke" Cunningham may not have limited his good times to partying on a rented yacht. It turns out the FBI is currently investigating two defense contractors who allegedly provided Cunningham with free limousine service, free stays at hotel suites at the Watergate and the Westin Grand, and free prostitutes.

The two defense contractors who allegedly bribed Cunningham, said the Journal, were Brent Wilkes, the founder of ADCS Inc., and Mitchell Wade, the founder of MZM Inc.; both firms profited greatly from their connections with Cunningham. The Journal also suggested that other lawmakers might be implicated. I've learned from a well-connected source that those under intense scrutiny by the FBI are current and former lawmakers on Defense and Intelligence comittees—including one person who now holds a powerful intelligence post. I've also been able to learn the name of the limousine service that was used to ferry the guests and other attendees to the parties: Shirlington Limousine and Transportation of Arlington, Virginia. Wilkes, I've learned, even hired Shirlington as his personal limousine service.

<clip>

http://www.harpers.org/sb-red-lights-on-capitol-hill.html


"Apparently photographs were taken, ..." :rofl:


Be The Bu$h Opposition - 24/7


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. Andrew Sullivan: "The suddenness of this departure, ...
... its Friday afternoon timing, and the absence of any obvious cause suggests there is more to emerge. My sources tell me: much more.

Link:

http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006/05/gosss_statement.html


Stay tuned ....


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Thanks, Understanding Life! You are such an awesome resource!
Got any thoughts on possible connections to Traitorgate? Are the frat parties/sleeze some kind of cover story? These people are so much dirtier than frat parties. Frat parties/sleeze/bribes/prostitutes/gambling are just the fringes. Not that I'm sorry to see their filth and hypocrisy exposed. But I can't help but think of Traitorgate cooking in the background--and Goss the followup hit man on Traitogate.

Here's a thought: They seem to have an agenda to gut and discredit all our "good government" ops. FEMA, for instance. So, what if Rumsfeld wanted to trash the CIA in the public's eyes, to discredit them--as they have been so intent on doing in other ways? What better way than a sex and sleeze scandal at the top? All the better for Rumsfeld's secret intelligence operations, torture, rendition, secret prisons and all the rest. Just a thought. Was Goss known to be a sleeze--and stupidly careless--and was put in place FOR THAT REASON?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. "Got any thoughts on possible connections to Traitorgate?" Perhaps, ...
... if as Steve Soto notes (see comment # 16 in this thread) that with Goss out of the way, Tenet's book might just make its way to the book stores in October, 2006.

If so, we may learn more about just how diligently Goss continued to suppress the , and we may find that Tenet is more revealing of just how damaging outing ValerieP and vaporizing the Brewster, Jennings operation(s) have been to our National Security.

We'll see ...

Thank you.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
55. I saw that
I'm staying tuned to TPM. He'll have the goods, probably faster than Sully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. Josh Marshall: "The hookers in Hookergate are, of course, the sizzle. But
Edited on Fri May-05-06 04:08 PM by understandinglife
... there's a bigger story. It stems directly from the Randy "Duke" Cunningham bribery scandal, which many had figured was over. But it's not. You may have noticed that while Duke Cunningham is already in jail and Mitchell Wade has already pled guilty to multiple charges, Brent Wilkes has never been touched. Wilkes is the ur-briber at the heart of the Cunningham scandal, you can see pretty clearly by reading the other indictments and plea agreements. Wade was Wilkes' protege.

Now, on the surface one might surmise that the prosecutors are just taking their time, putting together their best case. I hear different.

Wilkes has deep ties into the CIA. The focal point of those ties is to Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, the man Porter Goss appointed to the #3 position at CIA when he took over the Agency last year. Remember, Wilkes' scam was getting corrupt contracts deep in the 'black' world of intelligence and defense appropriations, where there's little or no oversight. Foggo was in the contracting and procurement field at the CIA. So you can see how he and Wilkes, who have been friends since high school, had plenty to talk about.

<clip>

... those 'hospitality suites', that moveable feast of food, poker and love, Brent Wilkes ran in Washington for maybe fifteen years. We hear that's how Goss got to be friends with Foggo, whom he later promoted to executive director of the CIA, the number 3 post at the Agency.

!!!

Much more at:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008376.php


As many of you are aware, Josh Marshall and his colleagues have been all over the Cunningham-Wade-Wilkes-..... crime syndicate story as it's emerged. I suspect we'll learn even more by staying tuned to TPM.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. K&R Goodbye Porter Goss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. Oh my,my, my, my. Thank you, UL, for putting these articles together!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. "Let's hope they learn a lesson from the Goss Affair - whatever's ...
... behind it."

by R J Eskow.


The folk on that list do indeed need to do some pondering ... this weekend.


If You're pro-Bu$h, You're Anti-America

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
37. I bet it was because he broke the law bigtime and the WH
is trying to shed as many criminals it can before the big fight between Fitz and Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #37
56. Porter who? Never heard of him before today...
What? Oh, yeah, that guy. He was a bad apple. We ditched him as soon as we found out.

What a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. "backstory" is an interesting innuendo, all righty-
as in "Baby's got Backstory".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. Jane Hamsher: "Color me confused. Everyone on TV seems to be buying ...
... the line that the Goss resignation has been planned for weeks. No natural curiosity about the fact that it takes effect immediately, or that there is no replacement, or that he had a meeting scheduled this afternoon he didn’t show up for. Not to mention the fact that as Professor Foland pointed out in the comments, the White House would’ve probably sacrificed its collective left nut to avoid stepping on a drunk Kennedy story. :rofl:

Much more at the link:

http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/05/hookers


Ouch ....


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. "THIS MORNING, I notified the President that I will be stepping aside ...
... as Director of CIA.

by Jane Hamsher


:rofl:

Hey Timmy, are you ever going to get off your knees.


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. It has to be related to the Cunningham thing...
No way Goss is out because of the "shakeup." That's nonsense. He's not important enough to replace, publicity-wise, and he has an important role to play at CIA for Bush. He is not a public figure. His replacement means nothing at all to the public. And obviously, it wasn't planned. Methinks Dusty Foggo is in deep, deep shit. And maybe Goss, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
44. Note to All: credit goes to SusanUnPC at Larry's "No Quarter" blog ...
Edited on Fri May-05-06 06:30 PM by understandinglife
... for the quotes in the OP:

Posted by SusanUnPC on Friday, 05 May 2006 at 15:05

Just want that corrected for the record.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
48. Hey, I just thought of something!!!

Maybe there are CIA agents that have the "goods" on the whole poker party / prostitute thing. And they blackmailed him into resigning! The CIA knows how to take care of their own. And they haven't been happy with the bushistas since the outing of Plame and Goss had to be one of the most hated DCIs in living memory (hated by the staff). I'm thinking they have all the evidence they need. Bush and Cheney probably have more to worry about from pissed off CIA and ex-CIA people then terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
50. Last night NBC did a story on all this stuff, Shirlington etc. Until
last night it had largely stayed in the blogs, TPM etc. Wondering if making it to MSM at NBC had anything to do with Goss today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. nbc/msnbc have been the only ones to truly cover this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
52. Just a turf war? Negroponte vs Goss. Does it go way back?
Negroponte, Wilkes, Foggo, all San Diego repukes.



"This photograph was taken in a nightclub in Mexico City on 22nd January, 1963. It is believed that the men in the photograph are all members of Operation 40. Closest to the camera on the left is Felix Rodriguez. Next to him is Porter Goss and Barry Seal. Tosh Plumlee is attempting to hide his face with his coat. Others in the picture are Alberto 'Loco' Blanco (3rd right) and Jorgo Robreno (4th right)."

What's interesting is that Wilkes and Foggo spent a lot of time in Central America (Honduras, El Salvador, later Panama -- Wade too), when Foggo was a CIA money man for the contras during Iran Contra and Wilkes would bring congressmen down from Washington to get a first hand look at the secret operation. Negroponte, another San Diego native (like Wilkes and Foggo), was also around, Oliver North was around, Porter Goss clearly in an earlier era was doing Central American operations for the CIA. It wouldn't seem to be too much of a stretch to wonder if they didn't run in overlapping networks, small informal fraternities of right-wing CIA-linked operatives and the private networks the government turned to to conduct operations that were supposed to evade oversight and basically not exist.


Posted by Laura at April 28, 2006 10:36 PM
http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/004070.html

And what about Lee Harvey Oswald?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #52
60. Turns out Goss and Negroponte go back even further
They were frat brothers together at Yale.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
57. OK, summing
up speculation, hopefully without simply putting all the smoke together:

Bush needs some structural discipline for Iran. Goss as part of widespread scandal would mire the WH again. Keeping the scandal in the House bush ignores is OK if only to shut up the grumblers iver there.
If it spreads beyond pals of Cunningham etc. to more branches of government it is bad. Kennedy's fender bender on a friday is as good as they can get without a terror alert and having the CIA director bail out during a alert draws more attention than they want. Stooges are interchangeable and Goss has served his particular purpose. The Cheney team is the one restructuring to save its agenda and skin.

Goss caught laughing at the Colbert routine on CIA computers.

When they mention that several House reps may get nailed that means everyone wants to contain the scandal. If 200 guys(names and occupations will be withheld pending payoffs) insist they conduct a weekly poker tournament there and there is no IMMEDIATE direct evidence or ties to the particular link that got prosecutors to the hotel register in the first place then the strategy is containment and no allowance for public skepticism that only six(on the Abramoff short list)were driven in limos for personal sexual gratification with female professionals.

Burning Goss is like deliberately setting a small fire in the path of a huge fire to exhaust the fuel and oxygen.

The whole sex as blackmail and spying general operation in the WH is another big possibility never approached at all by the MSM. Oddly, the pre-emptive war president is now employing the foreign policy Communist containment principle only to his domestic scandals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rememberearth Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
59. if they think another "fall guy" will pacify us they have another.......
thing coming. They've lied too much, and have done too many dastardly deeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
61. Larry Johnson: Why Did Goss Resign?
Why Did Goss Resign?
By Larry Johnson
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Saturday 06 May 2006

Yesterday's surprise announcement by Porter Goss comes on the heels of press stories that members of Congress received sexual favors from prostitutes allegedly procured by Brent Wilkes, an entrepreneur implicated in the bribery of Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham. Wilkes, we are told, hosted poker and hooker parties at the Watergate Hotel. Wilkes also happened to be an old high school buddy of the CIA's number three man, Dusty Foggo.

Speculation in the blogosphere suggested that Porter Goss selected Foggo because of his ties to Wilkes and may be implicated in the sexscapades. I'm told by a friend who used to work at the Agency that Goss, on this charge, is clean. In fact, Goss may be a victim, guilty only of selecting some lousy staff.

A former CIA buddy tells me that Porter's main problem, however, is a key staffer who is linked to both Brent Wilkes and the CIA's Executive Director, Dusty Foggo. My friend also said that it is highly likely that the Goss staffer did participate in the hooker extravaganza. Goss, politician that he is, probably recognized that even though he did not participate in the sexual escapades and poker games, his staffer's participation created a huge problem for him that would be difficult to escape.

There also is truth to the rumor that Goss was not happy with presiding over a CIA that had been rendered a co-equal with the Department of Defense intelligence units. Prior to the creation of the National Director of Intelligence, the CIA was the lead intelligence agency. No longer. Ironically, part of the impetus for the creation of the NDI was the perceived "failures" of the CIA with respect to 9/11 and Iraq. Recent revelations by retired CIA officers, such as Paul Pillar and Ty Drumheller, make clear that the CIA basically got it right on Iraq and was ignored by the Bush administration.

<clip>

Link to the full article:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050606X.shtml



Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC