Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush gets called on his Patrick Kennedy hypocrisy & can't take the debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:15 PM
Original message
Rush gets called on his Patrick Kennedy hypocrisy & can't take the debate
CALLER: You know what, whatever charge comes down against him, it will be watered down, and I'm referring specifically to -- I'm relating this specifically to the watered down charges that you had to face with your problem, which you let get out of hand before you did something about it, and you had money --

RUSH: Wait a second. You're going to compare me to Patrick Kennedy's circumstance?

CALLER: In a way.

RUSH: How so?

CALLER: Because you were brought up on charges --

RUSH: Tell me where they're similar. I had a problem. I admitted it. I went and dealt with it. I have been clean from the painkillers for almost two years and eight months. I went public. There's no cover-up. I sought and received help. I didn't endanger anybody else. In this case there's a cover-up. There's no breathalyzer. I fought this for two and a half years, and they wanted to charge me with much more than they did.

CALLER: Why didn't they?

RUSH: Well, you have to ask them.

CALLER: Well, that's what I'm saying.

RUSH: If you think I got preferential treatment, you are out of your mind.

CALLER: Well, what happened with that housekeeper in the parking lot?

RUSH: I spent thousands of hours and millions of dollars dealing with lawyers. I fought this at every stage --

CALLER: Would you just tell me and your audience, what happened to the housekeeper in the parking lot? Why was that never --

RUSH: You're talking about people who sold a story to a tabloid publication.

CALLER: Are you saying there was no connection, you didn't buy anything?

RUSH: I am not going to dignify the details in that stupid story. The only thing I would ask you to consider is this, Alice. If you want to believe all that was true, how come none of it was pursued?

CALLER: I'm talking about money. That's the whole point. Are you saying --

RUSH: What money?

CALLER: -- you did not meet this housekeeper in the parking lot?

RUSH: I'm not commenting on that, I'm not going to dignify it by doing so.

CALLER: That's how you getting around it.
RUSH: No, I'm not getting around anything. I'm answering your question. I'm not going to dignify such tripe. If you want to consider the National Enquirer as something that's legitimate, you feel free, go right ahead. I just ask you, why was none of that stuff pursued, why was it doctor shopping? But anyway, it's interesting here, you're on all sides of this. I'm trying to show a little compassion---
-----------
(blah blah blah-this goes on for two more paragraphs of limpballs alone acting like he's still talking to the caller, whose obvious been muted, while rush wants you to belive that he 'won' the debate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, I enjoyed that.
Hee!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then why didn't Rush file slander suit against Enquirer like others have
when the story they printed was wrong?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. Thanks for this. Can't believe he was actually challenged.
Edited on Fri May-05-06 05:19 PM by faygokid
He lives in a more tightly sealed cocoon than even Bush. How in the hell did this get through? Maybe he figured his dittoheads wanted to hear him bash a Kennedy at all costs. He is an idiot.
Vote cast here for greatest thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Typical ignoramus republican hypocrite blowhard.
They are people without substance, all hot air. I don't know why people want to be placated with such idiocy - I guess that says a lot about the republican mind (or lack thereof).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. whoa! The National Enquirer? Limpballs insults the NE!
klol! i hope the Enquirer gets on limpball's case...it look fukking good on the turdmeister!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Adenoid... Does he ever acknowledge at the very least the similarities
Edited on Fri May-05-06 05:22 PM by LaPera
of his and Kennedy's circumstances...if not how does he explain there are no similarities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Limpballs is another one who pees on your back and tells you its raining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. such a little mind he has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rush didn't "admit it" - He was busted!
Edited on Fri May-05-06 05:23 PM by Beaverhausen
what a lying sack of shit! He only admitted to it when he was caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Technically not a cover-up
If the authorities don't know that you're breaking the law.

He was caught, pure and simple.

The lawyers took it from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. So where's the cover-up in Kennedy's case?
Being addicted to painkillers isn't breaking the law. Obtaining them illegally - like Rush did - is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Beats me.
The cops were there, right at the scene. No charges were laid. He was driven home.

If he had been obviously drunk and witnesses saw him as drunk and the police didn't detain him - then that's a cover-up.

So far, I've heard nothing about alcohol from either witnesses or police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Exactly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. any way to let limballs know we're poking fun at him
over this?

what happened to the housekeeper, huh?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's no question at all that Limpballs got preferential treatment.
Rush is clearly delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. I can't believe he said this:
RUSH: I spent thousands of hours and millions of dollars dealing with lawyers. I fought this at every stage --

So having the cash to buy your way out of a problem by outspending the DA is . . .

a defense? My head is going to explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. and yet he doesn't see spending millions as "preferential"
as if we ALL have that option :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vickitulsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Ah, you noticed that too, eh?
I don't know how anyone can listen to this blowhard, but it's nice to hear at least that someone had the courage to call and confront him on his own program.

I had to laugh at the poke he took at the Enquirer, too. So what is Rush? A responsible newscaster? Gimme a break. I wish there were some way to hold that creep accountable for all the harm he's done in stoking the fires in our country. He's more than a little bit responsible -- directly responsible -- for helping this administration rape us all and harm people around the world.

Of all the words that describe him, he just proved when he criticized Kennedy that "hypocrite" is certainly right up there at the top of the long nasty list....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Websters NeoCon Abused dictionary
Is not "hypocrite" pretty much synonymous with "Republican" now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Yup.
And it will hang over them for a very, very long time no matter how they spin it. They forget. No matter how much you own and control, like all the tee-vee media and radio airwaves, people do the damnedest things...

GOSSIP Works in amazingly simple ways. 1 tells 1, then another and another and before long it spreads like butter. :)

Human nature at work I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Hi Felinity!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. link?
I'd like to read the other two paragraphs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Do you have a link to this transcript?? n/t
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. That's odd
that the caller got through...dosn't he have screeners?

I'll bet whichever one let Alice through is going to get a talking to from fathead himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. here's the link to the rest
if ypou want to give fatboy hits, that is. i put the meat and potatoes on here

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_050506/content/stack_a.guest.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sam Seder is playing this now!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. has media matters got it yet/
i looked a while ago, but nothing-maybe we should submit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC