Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Do Your Feel About Impeachment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:25 AM
Original message
How Do Your Feel About Impeachment?
I am thinking that we don't need another impeachment. I think it would be better for everyone if these guys just slid down into their own slime and disappeared. Which they seem to be doing even as I speak.

For one thing, this huge mess we call and administration has been caused by a whole lot of slimey people that found each other. Not just those in leadership positions, either. But all the greedy, power hungry pols and the people that voted for them.

I want to see them all go down. Not just the puppet prince.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd prefer an outright arrest for treason and war crimes.
We can't impeach *bush- we have no proof he's had sex since moving into the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. So true. Sex is the only high crime and misdemeanor.
Edited on Mon May-08-06 09:31 AM by leftyladyfrommo
I just want our country to have the best chance to get it back together and start fixing stuff.

But historically I guess the bad guys have to be executed as part of the healing process.

Hang Em High? Part of me would get some joy out of that. But a bigger part of me wouldn't. I just want them gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. There is citizens arrest...
"All states permit citizen arrests if a felony crime is witnessed by the citizen carrying out the arrest, or when a citizen is asked to help apprehend a suspect by the police. The application of state laws varies widely with respect to misdemeanor crimes, breaches of the peace, and felonies not witnessed by the arresting party. In California, for example, there is no requirement that a lawful arrest be executed by a citizen (as opposed to an alien or illegal immigrant), and the citizen's arrest is referred to as a "private person arrest." Note particularly that American citizens do not have the authorities or the legal protections of the police, and are liable before both the civil law and criminal law for any violation of the rights of another."

We could get a Katrina survivor to put them under arrest, and it would be completely legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Look, either we have laws or we dont.
This bunch are criminals. They need to be prosecuted. Impeachment is just a part of it.

It is needed for the health of our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Second! 750 broken!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's like 750 totally ignored.
I can't even get a grip on all this stuff any more. I don't think we have ever had a bunch of sleazeballs like this - where they simply ignored our whole method of government. And just rammed their awful ways right down everyone's throat.

It has been like 6 years in a dark black hole. We need to get out of this where we can see sunlight again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. that is whole problem
we never thought we would have our own screwing us and the world so badly, we are the only ones to end this total negligence and incompetence, or they will keep doing what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
50. Agreed! Exactly what bullimiami said!
Either you support Law & Order, or you support the Republicans. End of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willing dwarf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm thinking maybe pitchforks and sickels (said with a scyhte)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. I would be willing to settle for an opposition party
Impeachment would require an opposition party. The GOP couldn't get the votes against Clinton. There is no way that the DLC will chIMPEACH. It would not be good for Halliburton, so it is not good for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Do you think we need a whole new party?
The democrats in this Congress certainly have done a great job, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
37. I wish that I knew, leftladyfrommo
I don't have an answer. I have often thought of joining the GOP, and working from within to change the party. I oppose many policies (drug war, death penalty, bankruptcy, free trade, outsourcing / offshoring, preemptive war) that both parties support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. It just seems like the Democratic Party is so weak right now.
We need for the really strong leaders to get out there. Dean has been out last week. But we need a strong presence right now from Kerry and Edwards and Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. yes. our greatest strength is our weakness
catch 22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. I do think our guys will be getting out a lot more now.
Especially with the polls the way they are. And all of the crisis hitting at one time.

This is the perfect time to get out and start getting people to listen to the truth (or as near to it as a pol ever gets.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. agreed.
But I really do think that our "weakness" is a strength, as the GOP is now in control of everything, and pretty much everything is a MESS.

Since we only have two parties, one can crash, the other one really doesn't need to do anything to take control. I am afraid that the Dems will continue the old "we are not as bad as the GOP" or "we are a little better then the GOP" shtick.

I don't like it, but that is what you get when you have two wings of one corporate party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Think Nixon.
These criminals aren't going anywhere without being shoved. IMPEACH Bush**. IMPEACH Cheney**. It's their fault, not ours. We'll just be doing what's right.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. But Bush and Cheney are just the tip of the iceberg.
This whole thing goes down to a really, really rotten core. I tend to think Cheney is closer to the rotten core than Bush - Bush is so stupid he just doesn't have a clue. Or maybe not. Maybe its all just a big dumb act and underneath it is the great satan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. He's stupid like a fox
Did you ever catch his debates against Ann Richards when he was running for Governor of Texas? He wasn't this inarticulate and stupid. Either

A) He suffered traumatic head injury (I've actually seen somebody suggest that), or
B) He's been playing up the "Aww Shucks" routine since about 1998, when he started sounding this dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. After the Fish Story? Hs to be a brain injury.
Maybe he is back on drugs and booze. We would never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
28. bush is just sheltered by his daddy's friends
and the old cronies from the Nixon/Reagan administration. These guys have to be stopped in their tracks, they are just to ignorant and arrogant for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. I've changed my mind about it.
Impeachment sounds great - and I usually find myself shouting for it when I am enraged (which is quite often). Rationally speaking though - I really think it would be best when we regain control of Congress (think positive), we hogtie Bush and rake him over the coals for his outrageous power-grab until the presidential election in 2008.

My fear is if we spend all of our time on impeachment proceedings and are successful, it might give the Republicans a 'fresh start' in 2008. Let it drag out until the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. I think impeachment would be a big mistake
for the Dems. It would take enormous money, time, energy, and probably lose us a whole bunch of votes in the process. A Republican "outsider" like a governor could run on the same platform: new, uncorrupted, yada, yada. And they could be elected.

Let history and his God be his judge. Let's just please get in there ourselves and do it correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's the vindication I'm after
All the people who said I wasn't a "patriot" for criticizing Bush, that I was a crazy liberal making up stories, that everything was going to be great. That Iraq was a threat, and we would be greeted as liberators, that it wasn't about oil, that Halliburton was just a good company with the right skills for the job, that there was no bad reason for Cheney's energy meeting to be held in secrecy, that Valerie Plame "deserved it", that EVERYONE in the US believes in a Christian god, and that god should take His rightful place at the head of our government.

That companies will "do the right thing" because they want to, when it comes to protecting the environment, so we don't need laws for that. That global warming isn't really happening. That alternative energy sources are a waste of time, because oil is so cheap and great. That it doesn't really matter who is head of the Supreme Court, so long as that person is a friend of Bush.

Stop me before I get carpal tunnel syndrome....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. They Should Be Hung Out to Dry Over the Environment.
I would like to see them tarred and feathered and run out of town over that one.

Just one of many dispicable things they have done.

I will admit that they deserve to be hung up and flayed. I just want the right thing done for this country - not just for vengeance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mithnanthy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
54. I agree Kahleefornia!
Tell it like it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. I favor indictment and imprisonment
but I believe we need to start with impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes on impeachment
But it must be Bush and Cheney, not just Bush.

the very least it would do is keep them too busy to continue to trash the environment or (if we're lucky) invade Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is NOT just about us....
We have an obligation to the world to do whatever we can to stop Bushco. After all, we are the only ones who can. Those who are watching their friends and family get killed can do nothing to get Bush impeached. If the US is to ever have any friends in the world again, we need to be able to look them in the eye and say we did everything we could to stop Bush.

Did I mention this is NOT JUST ABOUT US?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. it is not about us
you are quite correct the world is watching, and remember there are many ex-pats who are living in other parts of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
20. Impeachment is OVERDUE and eliminates his PARDONING.
Pardoning at this point should be seen as obstruction of justice.

I say that Clinton's mistake was in dropping the Iran-Contra investigation. Although I understand why he did it, and I see that other things would have been traded, but more of these thieves might have been stopped from ascending high enough to steal from us.

We should not make that mistake now.

The cost of allowing them to expose themselves becomes too high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
22. He needs to be impeached for history's sake
I feel that it's important for future generations to know that the American people realized their mistake. We cannot let a fascist stay in office without some form of punishment. As it stands now, history will show that we re-elected Bush to a second term.

Future leaders must be shown that they can't get away with what Bush has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
23. Impeach, indict, imprison,...
...get on board with the Rome Convention of the International Criminal Court, then hand over the whole cabal to the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. Hear, hear!
Impeach. Indict. Imprison. The entire corrupt regime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
24. ITMFA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
25. I want to know the truth.
The only way for this Administration to be investigated is through congressional oversight.

If they find that this Administration is in fact likely to be guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, then indict (impeach).

There's only one way for us to find out the truth.

The facts don't have a liberal bias, or a conservative one. They are only the facts, and we can't get them unless we investigate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
26. How do I feel about Impeachment? Fine, thanks, and you?...
Read what my man Bob Fertik has to say about Nancy "No-spine" Pelosi about the matter:
next time a TV pundit grills you about impeachment, try some of these answers:
  • Well Tim, should a President be able to lie to Congress and the American people to start a war that takes the lives of 2,400 of our bravest sons and daughters?
  • Well Tim, should a President be able to wiretap thousands or millions of law-abiding American citizens without a warrant?
  • Well Tim, should a President be able to defy U.S. and international law by authorizing torture and even murder of prisoners?
  • Well Tim, should a President be able to lock away an American citizen without charges or access to a lawyer forever?
  • Well Tim, should a President be able to nullify 750 laws through signing statements?
Answers like these will accomplish a multiplicity of goals:
  • They will open the eyes of millions of Americans who are completely unaware of these crimes because they get all their news from TV, especially FOX
  • They will show Americans that you are smart as a whip - and tough as nails
  • They will make rightwingers' heads explode
  • They will make the pundit's head explode - and guarantee that no pundit will ask you about impeachment ever again

Now go read the entire enchilada!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. All for Impeachment, but it is only a process
As much as I'd like to him go, the line of succession is just as scary if not more so. I want them ALL gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
31. Impeachment is long, long overdue.
If this country is to become a nation of laws again, Bush and Cheney must be impeached and their entire gang prosecuted for their crimes.

Otherwise, we've surrendered permantly to fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. Impeachment...YES!
If what has happened to this country in the past few years is not an impeachable offense, I'd sure like to know what would be? Other than a sex act, that is. There has to be some justice somwhere! I don't see it happening in my lifetime, but there have to be lessons learned from this kind of presidential abuse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
34. This gang MUST be charged and tried
if we are ever to regain our position in the world. We need to prove to the rest of the world that they are an aberration, not business as usual.

However, this can be done after they leave office, and possibly should be. A far better immediate course of action would be to oppose them in Congress (like that's gonna happen), to pursue all the current investigations into rampant corruption, and increasingly isolate them from the rest of government, one crony at a time.

If ever there were grounds for impeachment, it is with this bunch. However, it should be done by their party, not by ours, to avoid the inevitable screeching over the right wing air waves of partisan witch hunts and all the other stuff they do but project onto us.

But there will have to be a reckoning. If there is not, we are lost.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
35. Impeachment would be fun
However, it might be more damaging if we show them how EASY it is to do things the right way. Kinda let the Republicans stew in their own corrupt juices and see how many decades it takes for Americans to start voting for them again.

Their party is already beyond crippled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
36. It is necessary
otherwise we only change the uniforms of the prison guards.

Impeachment is the process working as designed again. Impeachment is the cost of restoring good government.
Impeachment is what patriotic citizens of a republic demand when their government demeans the rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
38. Impeachment is the ONLY thing we DO NEED -- Our Only Moral Option
Without that, what exactly do the Dems imagine they can "win" or "fix?"

The spying and signing statement crimes require no investigation or hearings.

The regime has made are direct, willful challenges to the sovereignty of the American People, as expressed through existing law passed by generations of their representatives in Congress.

Each day any federal office holder refuses to act (Dems and Reps) they are in violation of their oaths of office and complicit with the ongoing treason.

Impeachment is the only moral, patriotic option.

--
www.january6th.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
39. Deserves it, but maybe shouldn't be
I had always leaned toward impeachment till I started looking at how long and complex a fight it would be and how little good it would do. Get rid of Bush and we have one that's about as bad, and another about as bad behind that one. They damned well deserve it, but I'm not sure if it wouldn't be just a waste of time as far as doing any good. In any case it would put him on par with Clinton in the minds of many, and that's not right. Why offer them any shred of dignity to hide behind?

The idea I like better is a full investigation into all of them with all info turned over to criminal prosecutors here at home as well as international agencies for possible war crimes trials. That's a bit closer to what they deserve. Too much honor in impeachment, why offer them that much respect? He's a war criminal, an impostor, not my President. Treat him like a war criminal under investigation, then prosecute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
40. Can you really believe we are safe with that man in office
The man you want to hang out and slink away has 2 more years to drive up oil prices, start new wars, offend more neighbors and ignore more laws.

This man can start a nuclear attack. He can continue to erode the barely there environmental laws we have. He can continue to appoint horrible, evil men and women to continue destorying the govenrmental agencies that protect and help us.

Bush must be impeached because he believes he is above the law and will ignore Congress when our represntatives say "pResident Bush, put down that WMD and walk away slowly".

And what happens when we have another disaster in America? The slime these guys are creating will take years, no generations to clean up. Get rid of them before they cause more damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. That is definitely an important question. And I wonder
about it myself. We need to get these guys stopped and that may be the only way to do it.

I don't know what we would do if they simply refused to recognise the proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
41. Too little too late, IMO.
If the fucking idiots in our country weren't so easily duped by pro-corporate, pro-GOP propaganda, we wouldn't even be in this mess right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
42. It does seem like it would become standard
Every time Congress is the opposite party of the President, it could happen. Doesn't seem like that was what it was meant for.

We are so overdramatic in American culture these days. If it's not the extreme, it's not enough for us.

But on the other hand, Bush's attitude towards the Bill of Rights makes me sick. Though it may not be impeachable.

Clinton should not have been impeached for that stuff. It was piddly, compared to what impeachment is meant for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marymarg Donating Member (773 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
43. Will of the people
I think there should be a comprehensive investigation of this administration. When everything is exposed to the light of day, the American people should DEMAND impeachment.
When politicians push for impeachment, it looks so...well, political. But if the masses arise and demand it, it becomes an act of patriotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
46. Why do the rich and powerful get a free pass--* Truly Has been criminal
Do we tell killers and rapists to just slime away? No, we prosecute them and deal them harsh sentences. Not only that, but those mfkers impeached Clinton for way less. It's time to even the score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
47. It's Putting The Cart Before The Horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
49. Sooner the Better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
52. I feel like people should get used to the idea that it won't happen
Edited on Tue May-09-06 09:25 AM by onenote
Assuming that the Democrats recapture the House -- still a very uncertain proposition -- and assuming that the Dems voted as a unified bloc or picked up some repubs -- also an uncertain proposition -- it might be possible to impeach in the House, although the process would (a) be divisive (b) energize the repubs (c) probably prevent any other real work from being done, which will not impress the voters in 2008. So, I suspect the chances of it happening in the House are probably less than 50 percent. And when you consider that there is no possibility of obtaining a conviction in the Senate...well, folks should get used to the idea that impeachment is going to happen (and even if it did, chimpy isn't getting removed from office).

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Listen to what calipendence said...
...about the "2/3rd Senate vote roadblock."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=1122801#1124969

One other strategy is to point out to America that it is the Republican Senators who ARE the ones that are standing in the way towards justice being done for REAL high crimes and misdemeanors (not ones just invented by the Rethugs against Clinton earlier). By having control over the committees in both houses, there will be far more opportunity to do extensive investigation to find many guilty parties (both in the executive as well as in the congress) of various crimes that we didn't have before as a minority party.

With the 2008 elections coming up for another set of Republicans after the Dems take majority (but not supermajority power), perhaps we can hang a big "kick me out" sign on them as part of some arm twisting to get their votes that basically says to them, if you want to stay in the Senate past 2008, and perhaps even stay out of prison in some cases, you will vote with us for this impeachment. Make the case that there are tons of people in this administration that have been part of the cabals of the Nixon administration and the Iran Contra affair of Reagan's, that at some point we need to sideline permanently by putting them in prison instead of issuing continual pardons that allow them to return to damage our country and political system more and more.

Also emphasize to certain Republican senators that if they don't exercise their independence on this issue for the above reasons and vote with a Democratic majority, that it will be that much more likely that the Dems get a supermajority in 2008 to fix things then (and likely with a Democratic president then), and if they felt like they ran things unopposed now without a super majority, for them to imagine what the Dems will be like then with a Democratic president and a supermajority in congress that could stifle fillibusters, etc. without any rule changes. Not to mention passing constitutional ammendments on many different things and looking for some judicial impeachments on SCOTUS, etc.

>
>
>

He also said this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=1122801#1130688

The third of the Senate with reelection in 2008 will be under a microscope
Edited on Mon May-08-06 03:47 PM by calipendence
They can be told that they are history in 2008, unless they go along with an impeachment if:

a) it is pointed out to them what happened to their Republican buddies in 2006 who got thrown out then. The same will likely happen to them in 2008 if they don't "change course" soon.

b) subsequent now Democratic Party in control investigations start turning up mounds of more evidence of crimes committed by this administration that has the public now DEMANDING Bush and this administration be replaced.

c) giving the Dems this temporary supermajority by voting with them to convict Bushco on impeachment might be their one hope to prevent the Dems from having a president and supermajority congress in 2008, which would give them an even bigger stranglehold than the Republicans have now, making it fillibuster proof, and one that could pass ammendments to the constitution like replacing Roe v. Wade with clear constitutional legal protections for women's choice rights, getting rid of corporate personhood, etc. that would remake our government. If they want the future Republican Party to have any power in that process, they WILL work with them to correct the current Bushco problem NOW.

d) working with the Dems, perhaps they could work out a deal to put in some pardons in place. If the Dems take charge, and do even more investigations in 2008 after Bush's term is over, all bets would be off, and those found guilty and convicted would NOT be pardoned. Though personally, I want VERY few pardons to happen then. It's time that those that have continued to infect administrations from the Nixon years, the Reagan Iran/Contra mess, and now Bushco need to be put permanently away instead of allowed to come back in the future again where they might cause more damage again.

Nixon and the rest of the Republican Party saw similar writing on the wall, which is why he resigned. If he hadn't, the Dems might have had an even more power than they did if they'd gone through an impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. overly optimistic
The fact that chimpy's ratings are in the toilet doesn't necessarily translate into a huge groundswell to impeach him, particularly in red states. And red state Senators aren't going to be cowed into thinking that they are at risk. They'll just use the fight as a tool for energizing their base and for arguing that the Democrats don't have any ideas.

Think about what it would take to get a supermajority in 2008. The Democrats would have to hold onto all 12 of their seats that are up and capture 16 of the 21 repub seats. There is virtually no precedent for such a swing. The closest in semi-recent history was the Democrats pick up of 13 repub seats in 1958 (plus two new seats from Alaska and one seat from Hawaii a year later). Keep in mind that even that pick up wasn't enough to give the Democrats a supermajority. The only time that has happened in recent memory was 1964, and keep in mind that a important part of that Democratic supermajority was made up of conservative Senators from southern states.

The fact is that its still not certain that the Democrats will capture the House and/or the Senate in 2006 -- certainly things are going the Democrats way, but there are a lot of close races out there and while I'm optimistic, if the Democrats regain either house, there will be pressure on them to spend time governing, not just investigating chimpy, who will be a lame duck who will be gone in two years regardless of what happens.

Repubs in congress have survival instincts, but they also know who there base is and where their money comes from; I doubt that there is anything that the Democrats could do in 2008 to capture repub seats in a number of states, such as Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, or Kentucky. Keep in mind also that most polls still show that around 2/3 of republicans think chimpy is doing a good job.

Overall, chimpy's numbers are moving towards the Nixonian level. But also keep in mind that the percentage of voters identifying themselves as Democrats was greater back then than today.

All in all, I don't think the scenario described has much chance of playing out.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. I can never convince any of you naysayers, can I?
I disagree. I think there is a strong possibility that that scenario will play out. My gut instinct tells me that he's definitely not going to be in there in 2008. I'll just put it this way, I'm somebody who's known to be proven right when I go with my gut instinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. time will tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
58. Impeach, indict, incarcerate.
Of course I support impeachment. We're a nation of laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
59. How does it look to the world if we let them slither away?
American needs to make an example of what a working democracy does to traitors, liars, and thieves who we recklessly allowed to power.

When "leaders" in a healthy democracy turn out to be the evil bunch currently in power, the people in a working democracy must not stand for it.

Impeaching or imprisoning would give the American people a chance to win back some of the good will the shithead and his cronies lost after 9/11.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
61. impeachment should happen now and not later
your post makes the error of letting the best be the enemy of the good

impeachment is good, it should happen, yes, there should be war crimes trials also but impeachment should and must still happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC