Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 th grade english; correct the grammar, syntax, & spelling of a freeper.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:53 AM
Original message
10 th grade english; correct the grammar, syntax, & spelling of a freeper.
I keep hearing how oil dependent we are and how higher consumption is driving up prices... I hear how it is adversely affecting 75% of americans, It seems like if that was the case, 75% of americans would cut the amount they use! I know I cant be the only person in america that has drastically cut the amount of fuel I use over the past year. I want to know what everybody has done to use less fuel.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1628544/posts



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. His Dad took away the car n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why is "America" not capitalized???
WHY DO YOU HATE THIS COUNTRY? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marbles Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Lurkers??!
"I would challenge you democtatic underground lurkers (or a freeper with a DU account) to post this over there and see what sort of repsonses come from the left..."

How could any DU lurkers survive there for more than two seconds? I once read something about how easy it was to get kicked off of there, so I tried it myself. I found the perfect opportunity, a thread about how proud some guy was of beating his liberal co-worker in an argument. Amidst all the nodding and chuckling, I interjected as "The Friendly Troll" (why hide it?), and opined about the need for rational discussion on both sides of the political spectrum. I was polite. Sarcastic in a joking kinda way. Reasonable. Didn't call anybody names.

Post got deleted within two minutes.

Wow.

(what is he doing, lying in wait for this kinda thing?)

I therefore cannot believe that anyone left-of-center could survive in there. Tell me if I'm wrong.

(Foidamore, if it's as easy for a right-of-center guy to get kicked out of here as long as he acts like something above Cro-Magnum level, this place ain't much better....)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, Botany. Do you like grizzlies?
Edited on Mon May-08-06 10:06 AM by Rude Horner
Just curious about the pic in your post. My wife is quite into grizzlies. In fact, her license plate is "GRZZLY".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I like Black Bears more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Holy cow, is that you?!!
That's a healthy black bear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No that is Dr. Lynn Rodgers
Edited on Mon May-08-06 10:25 AM by Botany
He has spent his life studying bears. Guess what? Black bears are not really that dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. True, except for the occasional rogue.
I wouldn't want to step between a mother and her cubs though. :) We're going to Yellowstone in about 3 weeks. Been there many times, and seen tons of blacks and a couple handfulls of griz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Dr. Rodgers
Disproved the black bear mother and cubs theory.

And rogue black bear are very rare.

I had a black bear follow our canoe as we were fishing in Ontario for about
30 minutes or so .... he/she just seemed amused by us. No danger but
we were about 20 feet from shore and the bear just followed along.
A red fox also came out of the woods too. It was neat but I have no idea
why the animals had "that behavior" on that day. Never seen anything like
it since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, give the kid a break,
he wrote it during recess just to impress Emmy-Lou out by the sandbox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Now there is a 40 year old saving lots of fuel
Edited on Mon May-08-06 10:35 AM by Wickerman
He uses Mom's car only when he goes out for porn. He lives in Mom's basement. He eats all of his meals with mom. Cooked on mom's stove. He surely doesn't bathe reqularly - that saves fuel. Yea to the fighting 101st Keyboarders!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's actually not that bad
Edited on Mon May-08-06 10:42 AM by alcibiades_mystery
I keep hearing how oil dependent we are and how higher consumption is driving up prices... I hear how it is adversely affecting 75% of americans, It seems like if that was the case, 75% of americans would cut the amount they use! I know I cant be the only person in america that has drastically cut the amount of fuel I use over the past year. I want to know what everybody has done to use less fuel.

1) I keep hearing how oil dependent we are and how higher consumption is driving up prices - A bit awkward, but nothing grammatically wrong

2) I hear how it is adversely affecting 75% of americans, Given the parallel structure of the previous sentence, the antecedent for the pronoun "it" here is ambiguous, but one would assume that the pronoun refers to "higher consumption" since that was the final element in the series. Inelegant? Sure. But not really that bad. Now, clearly "Americans" - as a proper noun - should be capitalized, and the final punctuation should be a period rather than a comma, but these could easily be typos, and it is a bit much to expect perfect, proofread documents on an internet message board, no?

3) It seems like if that was the case, 75% of americans would cut the amount they use! Obviously, the problem of capitalization at the beginning of the sentence, but this goes further to indicate that the final comma in the previous sentence was a typo. Sentences 2) and 3) would be comma-spliced. Again, "Americans" and continuing problems with antecedents (violation of the given-new contract, really), but overall, nothing major.

4) I know I cant be the only person in america that has drastically cut the amount of fuel I use over the past year. - Should use "who" instead of "that," since the Freeper is referring to a person (him or herself). Otherwise, a perfectly acceptable sentence, if inelegant.

5) I want to know what everybody has done to use less fuel. Nothing wrong with this sentence, structurally. Like the others, it is inelegant and lacks conciseness. It should probably read: "What have you done to reduce your fuel consumption?" but that's neither here nor there.

I find attacks on grammar and spelling online to be a bit silly. Such attacks mistake context: online contexts don't really call for grammatical precision - in the same way that oral discourse is very forgiving on grammatical issues. Online writing, many have argued, constitutes a kind of secondary orality, so attacks on grammar and spelling become tantamount to ad hominem arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Overall, I agree, but picking a nit with you.....
You wrote in part:

3) It seems like if that was the case, 75% of americans would cut the amount they use! Obviously, the problem of capitalization at the beginning of the sentence, but this goes further to indicate that the final comma in the previous sentence was a typo. Sentences 2) and 3) would be comma-spliced. Again, "Americans" and continuing problems with antecedents (violation of the given-new contract, really), but overall, nothing major.

The first clause in the freeper's sentence is intended as a counterfactual conditional, so it should be in the subjunctive mood ("if that were the case"). Also, I'm not sure whether "like" in that sentence is incorrect or merely inelegant, but I'd certainly prefer "It seems that if that were the case . . . ."

Given how few Americans can handle the subjunctive, we might have to bow to reality and go along with your assessment that bungling it is "nothing major."

My overall agreement with you is that the freeper post is well above the level that I expected based on the title of the thread. It wouldn't be hard to find posts over there that are far worse than this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-08-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. True
But I think you're right that such mistakes are quite common, especially in oral discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC