Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "I" word. Why do most of our Democratic office holders shy from it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:12 PM
Original message
The "I" word. Why do most of our Democratic office holders shy from it?
Because they are drinking from the same fountain that feeds the Republicans.

The re-"election" of GWB has shown that money can buy anything here in the U.S. and the vast majority of our Senators and Congressmen want to be able to pay for their next few years of power.

It sucks, but I really feel that's the way it is.

America has turned lazy and stupid.

We are about to pay the piper as the Corporate infrastructure goes on to greener fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our Democratic office holders shy away from it because they are
NOT IN CONTROL! I'm tired of hearing this; they can't do anything until the Senate and/or House have a majority. PERIOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And we don't need to run on it
If we don't mess it up ... the public will be begging the dems to do just that after November! They will be begging us to do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm in agreement. We don't want to and cannot go there - yet!
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dems will Investigate when they have subpoena power - now they have no
Edited on Tue May-09-06 11:20 PM by emulatorloo
power.

Please give the old 'they are all the same" nonsense a rest.

There are many good dems, and they want to investigate. But Pat Roberts (R) and his ilk keep blocking investigations. When Dems take back the house and senate, they will have subpoena power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Despite the severity of this, I have to send you a hearty DU
welcome! It's required! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think part of it is...
Edited on Tue May-09-06 11:25 PM by rpannier
Impeachment blew up in the pukes faces and they're afraid it will happen to them.

To be fair to them...There's so much going on, they've decided (and I think rightfully so) to focus on the corruption of the puke party. As many have noted, scrubbie isn't running. If the pukes in Congress can distance themselves from scrubbie and his incompetent admin then they could hold on to power. If you connect the dots from the WH to the Congress to many state officeholders then you can bring the whole thing down.

Impeachment is an after-effect. As Pelosi rightfully points out...There will be hearings and then we'll go from there. This is how we should be framing the issue of impeachment (IMO).

edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because they don't
want to throw gasoline on Turdblossims fire just yet, better to have control of the house first, and are the alternatives (replacements)any better, it could also conceivably cost us a Dem president in "08, you know better to lose the battle and win the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. No no no no no...
Allow me to offer a quick lesson in Politics 101.

If the Democrats craft their 2006 election theme around "Elect us and we'll impeach the bastard!", three things will happen:

1) Every progressive and liberal will go "Yahoo!" and surge to the polls.

2) Every right-winger will go "No way, Jose!" and surge to the polls.

3) The Great Wah of the centrist middle will remember the mayhem of 1998 and go, "Oh no, not again," and will stay away from the polls.

Here's the thing. Those lib/progs who will surge to the polls under the banner of impeachment are going to vote no matter what; that's what die-hards do. The right-wingers will likewise vote no matter what; ibid re: die-hards.

These two groups together maybe make up 40% of the electorate. Maybe. It's more like 30%-35%.

WE NEED the Great Wah of the centrist middle to vote this time around; midterm turnout is always very low by comparison, and we need all of them we can get. If only the die-hards come out, it'll be another narrow election cycle. If the centrists come out and vote our way, it'll be a landslide.

If we go to war under the impeachment banner, most of the excellent issues we have against the GOP and Bush (the war, the deficit, the spying, the scandals, Katrina, etc.) will wither and die. Many GOPers who might otherwise stay home out of disillusionment will vote their asses off to keep this one thing from happening. We want them to stay home in November.

And pssst, the impeachment round will still be in the chamber if we win. The fact that we don't run on it doesn't mean it won't happen. I know for a stone fact that Conyers office has files and reports and investigations ready to roll on Day One.

(/preachy rant)

I think he should be impeached. I DO NOT think the '06 campaigns should be about impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree... I'm talking about the here and now as well as recent past...
We need to campaign on strengths and plans...

The two things that the new RW talking points seem to be intent on convincing the American public that we do not have.

I hope they keep that line of thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I bet there are some on the right wouldn't mind it a bit if
we did the dirty work of impeaching bush. It won't be on their hands and they won't be branded as disloyal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. "I" know impeachment is not on the table at this point, nor should
it be. But after November 06, all bets are off!
Now could actually be the time to sit back and watch them make matters worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good grief.
Democratic congresspeople are not talking about impeachment because it's something they can't accomplish now. To spend time talking about impeachment would be foolish. The American people want to know what the Democrats plan to do when they are in charge, and how they plan to lead.

Yes, money is a huge problem in politics, but that has nothing to do with Democratic office holders not banging the drums of impeachment now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Right, we can't accomplish it now, but it does not mean we need
to act like we don't want it simply because we cannot have it.

It's a stupid psychology in which certain folks think they shouldn't broach the subject because it would make them look weak because it does not happen.

I would love to hear Pelosi say, "Yes, I think he should be impeached, but it won't happen while both houses are in his back pocket."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. No. Because they *know* that the Repugs will exploit any such talk.
The question is... Why don't some people here on DU understand that when one is standing for the most important election of ones career and one knows that the Repugs are going to whine about impeachment, that there might be better ways to frame issues than saying that ChimpCo are going to be impeachment targets?

If Dems start talking impeachment, the Repugs will roast us with it in autumn. That will hurt Dems because no matter what, people have a sense of fairness and won't like candidates who are campaigning on a platform of impeachment.

It's quite simple, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Don't be so full of yourself, or how anything might happen.
"It's quite simple, actually?" Give me a clue how simple that might be; I'm all ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. If I were running for office, I would wear an "Impeach Bush" t-shirt at
every speaking engagement. :D

In fact, I would earn campaign money by MAKING my own clothing, etc. that says: "If you vote for me, the first thing I'll do is impeach Bush."

Maybe I have no idea what I am talking about because I am not a Washington insider, or a professional politician or a political pundit... or even a blogger for a progressive website. :)



Fuck being nice to the opposition! To Hell with 'playing politics'!

WE MAKE THE RULES!!! :patriot: WE THE PEOPLE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Love that new graphic! And hell, yeah! The regular guy needs
to be heard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. and the 'irregular guy' too!
:D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC