1. Yup...Add to it all the confidences between accountants and
clients, physicians and patients, and newsmen and sources. Add everyone that does phone sex. Add anyone calling girl friends or mistresses. Add politicians talking to lobbyists too.
3. i dont think so; the fact of the occurence of the communication is not
subject to privilege, its the communication itself. I can ask in a deposition or trial if a party had communicated with their lawyer; I cannot ask about the content of the communication (well i can ask; but they have the right to refuse answer and invoke the privilege).
4. Do you really believe they aren't selectively listening?
They only admit the violations as they get caught?
Further, does the government really have the right to electronically tail me as I investigate a case when it is the government which has brought charges against my client?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(649 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
