Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's the real deal on the party changes...a power shift away from DC.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:00 PM
Original message
Here's the real deal on the party changes...a power shift away from DC.
Edited on Thu May-11-06 09:02 PM by madfloridian
It is a power shift away from DC. It may not work. It may work quite well. It won't be pretty to watch, it hasn't been pretty the last couple of days. But it will most definitely be interesting to see how it plays out.

From February 4th of last year...just before the DNC elections.

http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050214&s=lizza021405

The DNC chair race has exposed deep fissures within the Democratic Party. Some of these are ideological, but the real story of the race is the diffusion of power away from Washington and to new people and entities that have rushed to fill the power vacuum at the top of the party. When the Democrats control the White House, the president can simply pick the chair of the party. But, even when out of power, Democratic pooh-bahs traditionally rally around a consensus figure and present him to the DNC members as a fait accompli. An open process with all the trappings of a modern political campaign--including a seven-candidate field, fund-raising, regional debates, and smear campaigns in the press--is unprecedented in the party's history. To many Washington Democrats watching the circus-like contest from afar, it has been an embarrassment. "I think it's pathetic," says James Carville. "It's so indicative of the Democratic Party. Now we're just playing into every stereotype: We're weak, disorganized, flopping around. ... Somebody should have fixed this damn thing in November. I wish someone would have taken charge and three or four people would have gotten together in a smoke-filled room. ... They're not running for president! They are running for party chair. This is supposed to be a rigged deal. You think the Republicans would do it this way?"

But every attempt to rig the race failed, revealing that the levers of power in the Democratic Party have shifted out of Washington's hands. From the congressional leadership to the governors to the Clintons, top Democrats were all terrified of a Dean victory. They believe he will turn what is essentially a low-key fund-raising and management position into a lightning rod for GOP attacks, eclipsing other voices and emphasizing exactly the elements of the party that weeks of postelection soul-searching had determined the Democrats needed to play down (e.g., its liberal stance on cultural issues and its weakness on national security). And yet none of them could stop him.


There is a lot to this article, written just before Dean was elected. It is not exactly a fun one to read. This last paragraph tells what is still going on, what Dean must face. He is after all, as those of us who supported his campaign know.....a real outsider. He may have been a centrist governor, he has often more moderate views than some...but it is more that he is opening the party up to us. That is what it is about.

But reform is also the new buzzword in the party's idea factories and among its elite as well. Much of the Democratic Leadership Council's recent advice for the party is to retake the mantle of political reform from Republicans using issues like redistricting, ethics, and electoral reform. Similarly, Carville tells anyone who will listen that Democrats must embrace the label of reform. But they are not talking about party-wide revolution. (Carville, after all, was appalled by the open process of the DNC chair's race.) They are talking about issues Democrats can use to defeat Republicans. Dean's first hurdle as chairman will be to erase the cartoon image of him that is seared into the minds of most Americans. But, beyond that monumental task, Dean will somehow have to mend the insider-outsider cleavage in the Democratic Party, a cleavage that he, perhaps more than anyone else, is responsible for creating--and which finally brought him to power.

Ryan Lizza is a senior editor at The New Republic.


It may or may not work, this experiment. It if does we will all benefit from it. There are signs that the entrenched power brokers are very strong in getting airtime, getting their words before others. That may in the end either slow it down, or even kill it.

But there are other options, after all that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. More on the power shift involved in the chair selection.
Not the usual players at all. I had not heard much about this group until the Dean Campaign was over, and our group became active as DFA.

A heretofore obscure entity, the Association of State Democratic Chairs (the ASDC), a subgroup of the 447, moved aggressively to take the place of the bumbling Hill leadership and Democratic governors who found themselves unable to influence the process. The Democratic chairs are led by Mark Brewer, the head of the party in Michigan. He is one of the semi-anonymous cogs in the Democratic machine who has spent decades moving from one perch to another (precinct delegate, vice chair, chair) but rarely gaining respect from the establishment or much influence within the DNC. He realized this was his chance to make himself and the other state chairs major players. Brewer singlehandedly turned the selection process for party leader from a race about the future of the party into a debate about the ASDC's idiosyncratic agenda.


At the Orlando meeting Harold Ickes took the wrong tack with this group called the ASDC. He told:

the ASDC that they needed to fix their state parties before they come begging for money from Washington. Most of the other candidates simply promised to shower more cash on them.


So actually promises are being kept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gasp, the Democratic Pary might become democratic!
Mr. Dean is not running for anything. All he has to do is raise money and build something like the street level Democratic Party organization that once was, and win elections. He shows every sign of being able to do that. If he does that, nothing else matters, and for sure these "power brokers" will not matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or maybe not. That could happen also.
Anyway, it's a grand idea if it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC