Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My state passed a 2003 law protecting telecoms from suits; did yours?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 07:31 AM
Original message
My state passed a 2003 law protecting telecoms from suits; did yours?
Texas HB 2474 passed on 6/1/2003, becoming effective 9/1/2003. It loosened regulations for electronic surveillance, and took away recourse for customers who might want to sue the carrier. At the time, I thought that it was probably a sign that the Bush Administration was embarking on a massive domestic spying program under the Patriot Act, and that telecoms were nervous about getting sued.

No recourse for the one who is being monitored -- the bill states that:
(g) A computer trespasser or a user, aggrieved person, subscriber, or customer of a communications common carrier or electronic communications service does not have a cause of action against the carrier or service, its officers, employees, or agents, or other specified persons for providing information, facilities, or assistance as required by: (1) legislative authority; or (2) a court order, warrant, subpoena, or certification under this article.

Any bets that these popped up in states (particularly GOP-controlled states) across the country at about the same time?

I happened to stumble across this one in May of 2003 -- before it had passed -- while searching the Texas legislature website. If there were any newspaper articles or public discussion about the bill, I missed it.

At least in the initial version of the bill, all it took was a peace officer to certify to a "communications common carrier" that the officer was acting lawfully and the "communications common carrier" was off the hook and protected from a lawsuit. The bill also specified that the communication carriers would be compensated for any expenses (naturally!Corporations are always entitled to compensation for any nuisances imposed by the Federal government, and individuals never are...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
darkmaestro019 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Boy, that's really cute.
Can I get a law passed that darkmaestro019 can do whatever he wants and nobody can sue him? Thought not.

I need yet another tshirt: NO SPECIAL RIGHTS FOR CORPORATIONS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC