things aren't like they were in Vietnam. College deferments have been limited ONLY till the end of the semester
So I understand. Since most of the proposals would draft people at age 20, this would generally
cut off one's college education a year shy of a degree. Seems perverse.
They aren't going to just be able to pick up where they left off after being forced into the Army for 2 or 4 or 8 or however many years.
Many who are in college are far from wealthy, and most of are NOT Republicans.
Will the financial aid they are getting now still be available when they get out of the Army?
If not, will GI Bill benefits make up for the loss?
then it's SHAPE UP AND SHIP OUT SOLDIER !!!!
Those they cannot turn into soldiers they destroy.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=1511This isn't targetting JUST the rich and powerful, but primarily the young repukes.
Seems like it will scoop up young Democrats at least as efficiently -- probably more so, due to lack of the sort
of "connections" that can get you into a "champagne" unit (like **) or out on some imaginary medical condition
like some other chickenhawks we know.
There is no way to make it fair. If you disallow medical exemptions, you end up sending sick and disabled people
to be slaughtered in battle, which isn't exactly fair either.
Not everybody is cut out to be a soldier.
If the Draft has Democratic fingerprints on it, it will be Democrats who pay the price at the polls!
Let's be honest the rich will ALWAYS stay with the repukes
The rich are deserting the repukes in droves, because they can see that the repukes are irresponsible madmen!
For the most part, the rich like stability, and ** is destabilizing stuff big-time.
Quite a few of the rich never were taken in by ** in the first place. (John Kerry and George Soros come to mind)
we need to take away their believers. The religious, the righteous, the disillusioned. The people who believe, but don't have daddy pulling strings to get them into a "champagne brigade."…
Seems like a lot of them have kids in the Army already. Some of the rest would probably approve of their kids getting forced into the Army. They think it's the Crusade.
the coward repukes will rush to Canada
Presumably those who disapprove of the war would be even less inclined to sacrifice themselves or their children to it.
A lot of people will rush to Canada. Most of our best and brightest. Our loss. Their gain.
Furthermore it would solidify opposition to the war among the civilian populace.
It took longer for the Vietnam war to become as unpopular as the Iraq war now is, and there was a draft for that war.
A draft for an unnecessary and unpopular war would have a SERIOUS backlash.
But if Democrats' fingerprints are on the draft,
the backlash will be against Democrats!If we can avoid Iran
The only reason we have avoided Iran so far is a lack of available cannon fodder.
a draft wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, we desperately need more troops if we don't pull out of Iraq, just to stabilize the area. I'd rather we get out entirely, but I doubt repuke or dem leadership would do that (makes em look weak, dontcha know).
If they don't have the draft, they will
have to bring home the troops, and soon!
With a draft, an unlimited supply of cannon fodder, they can continue and expand to their bloodthirsty hearts' content.
PNAC needs the draft. They know they need the draft, but it's political suicide,
so they are trying to get the Democrats to commit political suicide for them.
Then they get their draft and move on to crank up World War III with the opposition completely neutered.They have all the machinery in place for cranking up the draft on very short notice. They are just waiting for an
opening to get it through while avoiding the political consequences, or preferably shifting them onto us.
We should expose the Republicans secret plans to start up the draft.
That will have all of the good effects you are looking for, and none of the bad ones of actually having a draft.