"Lunatic Left" Claims Rove Has Been Indicted!!!!!

Congratulations Mr. Leopold, you have stirred up the dung beetle nest!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1631871/posts

It's taken them 5 hours to log 50 posts. Methinks they're a tad worried.

Not to mention inspired them to evolve from "looney left" to "lunatic left"!

And what is the point?

that's links to "the site which shall not be named" that are banned.

Sometimes I find the lunacy posted there amusing, other times it's frightening that actual human beings posted some of that crap. Regardless there are some brave liberal souls that go there to get an estimation of their "thoughts," I haven't been there in months, and even then it was on accident.

not under the same rule.

and demonstrated in some of the other resonses.

The link is overt, so if you're adverse to going to that website you can't blame me for sending you there.

Just wait until Fox News reports on it Monday night. There's no way in hell they can ignore it once it's announced.

is supposed to be giving a speech on Monday nite, something about how he's going to station the National Guard at the borders (like they're not already all in Iraq, and like he really cares about the borders, or the ports...) Sure would be fun to have this news come raining down on his parade!

"It's the new Fitzmas, I guess...
More proof that the Dims hold on to false hope."

This from the only other topic there on Rove: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1631884/posts

God I hope this is true and someone with an account over there bangs some heads!!!

:D

I am crushed :)

I asked someone earlier to post it there. I don't have an account nor do I care to but it's fun to poke the nest from time to time (admit it).

...shooting your mouth off.

A Fweepie actually said, "You don't put yourself in front of a grand jury ONCE if you are guilty," much less for a fifth time; ergo Freeper anti-logic says: Rove appeared for each subpoena, therefore he MUST be innocent.

Ahem. This is a GRAND JURY.

From Wikipedia:

"In all U.S. jurisdictions retaining the grand jury, the defendant has the right under the Fifth Amendment not to give self-incriminating testimony.

"However, the prosecutor can call the defendant to testify and require the defendant to assert the right on a question-by-question basis, which is prohibited in jury trials unless the defendant has voluntarily testified on his own behalf."

If subpoenaed, the only way NOT to appear before a Grand Jury is to go the Judith Miller route: Go to jail.

Otherwise, you are bound and required to (at miminum) appear...you are not bound to answer questions, however, if you take the Fifth.

Rover had only two choices regarding appearance:

1) Refuse to appear for any one of his five invitations...and go to jail.

2) Appear, and (on a question-by-question basis) take the Fifth whenever he and his counsel knew answers would be incriminating.

There is no third, "I'm innocent, nyah nyah!" option.

Obviously, many of the backwash live in the "All gut...No Fact Zone"*

* (Copyright 2006 Stephen Colbert.)

Most read like they were written by the same person...did anyone get that impression too?

Most read like they were written by the same person...did anyone get that impression too?

Most read like they were written by the same person...did anyone get that impression too?

Most read like they were written by the same person...did anyone get that impression too?

:popcorn: :popcorn:

copycat posts...

I actually found that sequence to be hilarious. I'm proud of my fellow DU'ers for being that witty this early in the morning! :rofl:

Which is why I made the Lounge comment... it seems pretty serious in GD most of the time.

:rofl:

arguments to things when you're debating them. I figure that is the latest thing Rush said on it.

of this administration for years to come.

Thanks to Rush and Fox News for all the brainwashing. It's going to take us decades to reverse the damage.

I just heard a woman on Cspan say she voted for the chimp and now regrets it because he's incompetent.

Happens constantly now that gas is approaching $4.

To: samadams2000
What? That's what I say. Let's say that Rove is guilty as sin, that he had a little black book and he called everyone out there to tell them all about someone's CIA wife. Let's also say he lied to investigators.

What happens? He goes to jail? Big deal. What of it? I'm sorry, but there's nothing to this story. A political gotcha doesn't make up for nearly a decade of soundly trouncing the Democrat party. There's no prize here. Are they implying that public satisfaction with the president might actually dip lower than congress? Fat chance of that.

A Rove indictment makes it all that much harder for Rats to gain traction because all they have is a party of wackos waiting for camera time to chase away more voters. So indict Rove, send him to jail - it'll make the mid terms that much easier.

:wtf:

"So indict Rove, send him to jail - it'll make the mid terms that much easier."

so their heads won't explode! :nuke: :evilgrin:

I'm surprised your head isn't twisted backwards after reading that.

WHAAAAAAAWHAAAAAAAAAWHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

Oh, happy day!

post 102:
"It's a crap story. But I won't be shocked if Rove is indicted."

LOL! What a fucking idiot, probably doesn't even realize he's just said 1+1=3