Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Putting National Guard on the Mexican border is not about

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:46 AM
Original message
Putting National Guard on the Mexican border is not about
illegal immigration it is about wresting control of the National Guard from the states. Every move bush makes is to grab more power into the executives.

So what do you think? Am I on the right track?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is a strong reason but I think a
side issue for *.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Side Issue? More like a...
Edited on Sun May-14-06 10:57 AM by C_U_L8R
Side Show. :-)

And yeah.... he's passing the buck (the cost)
onto the states.... Ahnold don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep.
Illegal Mexicans have been coming over that border for 30 years. Suddenly they are the source of terra?

It's almost comical.

The only place that should have been investigated over 911 was the Saudi consulate. They gave the tourist and student visas to most of the hijackers. And even they couldn't have done anything about it if the intelligence wasn't shared with them.

911 and Terra hasn't worked to get even the sheeple to go along with martial law. Time to inflame their racist passions about those job-stealing illegals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. You saying they are the new Willie Horton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Maybe, but I don't remember too much about him - the one
Bush Sr.'s campaign used to get Dukakis? He got out of jail and then committed another crime?

As a distraction, maybe. Because this stuff has been going on for thirty years and had nothing to do with 911, so why all of a sudden is it such a big deal? The people are afraid of terrorist attack one day and now they're afraid of an illegal taking their job, as if it were a threat on the same order of seriousness?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. The threat of nuke/bio would be greater at our ports
than at our borders. Let's see someone carry a nuclear bomb across the desert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. No, I don't
I think Bush is trying to placate his base. Immigration is the only issue the repukes can trumpet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. But isn't he asking for more control over the National
Guard? Is he taking from the governors the ability to decide where their Guardsmen are deployed domestically?


Isn't he testing the boundaries of the posse comitatus by deploying soldiers to do what is classically a law enforcement job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Posse Comitatus applies only towards American citizens
Edited on Sun May-14-06 11:09 AM by jerry611
Posse Comitatus does not apply to foreign nationals. Therefore the government is legally able to use the military against non-citizens.

Foreign nationals have no rights under our constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Thanks. What we need to do is pay attention to the details.
Let's see what type of EO he signs, and legal justifications he uses relating to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. Actually that is not true. A person in the US has the same rights
when accused of crime no matter who he/she is.

But the point is using the National Guard in an illegal way. The President is not above the law. He can only use the National Guard in the way the law says he can. But we know this administration is willing to claim powers above that, so naturally we need some legal backing for his claims.

The President could put regular troops on the border should the nation of Mexico be attacking us with its army. But not just over illegal immigration. According to the law, the INS has that responsibility. The only legal way to deal with it is more INS agents, period.

It's just that it isn't worth it, because the problem is only so severe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. What you write may be true, but
I just think Bush is playing some cards that will sit well with his base. I troll Lucianne.com at least once a day, and his so called inaction of illegal immigration gets hit a bunch from his other wise brain dead supporters.
This administration has proved itself to be uncaring about whether an action appears or doesn't appear to be unconstitutional. They just don't care. To use the National Guard like this is a political action. And they may not do any good. How many troops would be needed to seal the border? The whole idea looks like a loser to me, but the Bushies may think differently. They are in a bind. They don't have much to run on, but some wild ass solution on illegal immigration.
I don't know if he has the legal right to order the Guard to patrol the border. If he does, who pays them? How long will they be there? Until the day after the election?
What ever the bushies thought process is on this matter, the whole thing is going to look bad, for many years to come, with the Hispanic population. The whole thing reminds me of Prop 187 in California. I thought Prop 187 was bad at the time of its appearance on the California ballot, and said so, but it took a little while for it to sink in on most voters, that the repukes in California will pay dearly for Prop 187.
Immigration has been a festering problem for years in this country. Nobody in power gave a shit. Now that the repukes have fucked up just about every thing they touch, with their control of the three branches of the federal government. Now that they are totally without anything to run for reelection on, they insist we adopt a draconian solution to a problem they ignored for all these years. The repukes are not shooting themselves in a foot, they are shooting themselves in the temple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I am always trying to see the story behind the story. Sure he
is playing to his base, but maybe there is another power play. Look at S 1955. That would have taken away the power of the states to set standards for healthcare. Is there a power grab hidden beneath this move?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Right -- so it's a twofer for him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's a variation of #1on Bolten's 5-point plan: "Think of the visuals"
1 DEPLOY GUNS AND BADGES. This is an unabashed play to members of the conservative base who are worried about illegal immigration. Under the banner of homeland security, the White House plans to seek more funding for an extremely visible enforcement crackdown at the Mexican border, including a beefed-up force of agents patrolling on all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). "It'll be more guys with guns and badges," said a proponent of the plan. "Think of the visuals. The President can go down and meet with the new recruits. He can go down to the border and meet with a bunch of guys and go ride around on an ATV." Bush has long insisted he wants a guest-worker program paired with stricter border enforcement, but House Republicans have balked at temporary legalization for immigrants, so the President's ambition of using the issue to make the party more welcoming to Hispanics may have to wait.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816,1186555,00.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Visuals? Hunting Brown People?
That's enough to make the Freepers
flail into a frenzied circle jerk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. And Rove's right in the middle of this
Southern lawmakers met with White House strategist Karl Rove earlier in the week for a discussion that included making greater use of National Guard troops to shore up border control.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14557377.htm

Why am I not surprised.

These will be strong visuals to match the ever-increasing militaristic rhetoric surrounding this issue: the Minutemen, the "invasion," the "army of illegals."

And what deals will need to be struck with governors to deploy the Guard in this way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's a possible side effect, however...
I support putting our troops on the border. That border (if you can even call it a border anymore) is a joke.
The US, as a sovereign nation, has a right to protect our borders and control what comes into the country.

If you support illegal immigration, you are supporting Bush's free trade and open-border policy. You are supporting corporations that hire immigrants at slave wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. I dont
Seems like a very costly move to me. How will we pay for it? Tax cuts to the rich? What are the troops going to do? Shoot the people coming across. They won’t do that? Unless we declare martial law they can't make more than a citizen arrest on the people. 20,000 troops not trained at boarder patrol are unlikely to do anything effective for the situation. Deploying them however cost money to us. The will also unnecessarily disrupt the lives of these 20,000 national guard troops. Bush has had 5+ years to beef up and train effective people for this job. He's had 5+ years to enforce the laws that already exist. He’s had 5+ years to go after the CEOs of businesses that employ people illegally in the country. Instead he plans a big show that will do little and is going to cost a lot. This is the same way these idiots manage every thing in this country. They manage the show not the problem. It will look great on TV, and that’s all they care about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I am tired of an unsecure border
If it takes a tax increase to pay for it, I'll pay it. No problem. This is what our soldiers should be doing anyway instead of fighting for stupid wars in the mid-east. Protecting our nation's borders should be the priority, especially after Septemeber 11th.

What you do is what Colorado is trying to do. YOU STOP AWARDING IT! Cut off healthcare and education to illegal immigrants. Don't allow corporations to hire them. I assure you, all 13 million illegal immgrants will go home and if they want to be Americans, they will come back legally.

And it isn't just aliens...
Drug and human trafficking is occuring on that border. These people are armed cartels and gangs that has shot live rounds at our Border Patrol. And our stupid government has told border patrol not to return fire. So these gangs have no fear. Many of these people associated with these cartels are Mexican police and military. To cross our border and shoot live rounds at our government officials and citisens is an internationally-recognized "act of war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Bush should not have let this go so far. His designs on Iraq have
quite a bit to do with our porous border. Bush had to curry favor with Fox to get him to sign off on the war on Iraq. Why hasn't bush done anything to dramatically increase the number of guards? Would that have endangered his massive tax cuts to the very people who are hiring the illegals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. It could take an 80% tax hike to do that. You're talking about
enforcing tons of new laws, and there is a hidden tax on the cost to all the private entities you're making responsible for the job of the INS.

Human migration is just a fact of life. It is huge and uncontrollable. It goes on all over the work depending on specific conditions. Regulate it by identifying the people who come and go rather than having an unworkable law that can't be enforced. That is the way it is done for nonMexicans.

Mexicans should just be able to come and go legally. There is a rational reason for having a special immigration law for them. (And Canadians). If they could work here legally, there would be no motive for employers to compensate them on terms like less than the minimum wage. They'd have no motive to sneak across the border. You'd know who was here and therefore would feel much safer.

You're making the same arguments from 30 years ago and proposing more of what hasn't worked for the last 30 years (at least).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Excuse me, I dont mean to offend....but that is bulls---!
We are spending $300 billion for the Iraq war. Are you saying it would cost more than that to secure the southern border?

This is what you do... You cut off the education and healthcare for illegals and give that saved money to hard-working Americans that can't afford healthcare, and also a raise to teachers. Then place the 140,000 troops we have in Iraq to guard the southern border. I assure you that the drug trade and human trafficking will either diminish significantly or stop completely. Anyone that is caught crossing illegally is sent back. 2nd offense is a felony and they will go to prison.

This is the only way that border is going to be controlled. And why should Mexicans get special immigration laws? How is that fair to the Europeans that want to immigrate here? Because the Mexicans will work for slave wages? Because Mexicans will "do the jobs Americans wont do?"

You are just as bad as Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misternormal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. The thing that really scares me is this...
... I hardly think that attempting to sneak across the border in order to work and support a family is a capitol offense... What are the orders going to be to the Guardsmen at the border?

Shoot to kill?

Are we as a people, who's entire society is built upon human rights going to stand by and allow this to happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. Per Goode Amendment, troops can't do ANYTHING.
It's all a bait and switch, CYA by *.

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of
Defense to assign members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine
Corps, under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions, to
assist the Department of Homeland Security in the performance of border
protection functions.


Conditions of Use- (1) Whenever a member who is assigned under
subsection (a) to assist the Bureau of Border Security or the United
States Customs Service iN performing duties at a border location
pursuant to the assignment, A CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FROM THE AGENCY CONCERNED SHALL ACCOMPANY THE MEMBER.

(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to AUTHORIZE A MEMBER ASSIGNED UNDER THE SUBSECTION TO CONDUCT A SEARCH, SEIZURE, OR OTHER SIMILAR LAW ENFORECMENT ACTIVITY OR TO MAKE AB ARREST.

Caps mine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. So they are glorifed Minutemen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Glorified minutemen that we are paying for and that are under
Bush's control. I assume this is an attempt by him to get the American people used to seeing our troops being used for domestic purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. The devil's in the details. Let's see what he says and
what he does afterwards. Let's see how the states react. It is coming up to hurricane season. I'm sure some southern tier states will not be willing to lose more Guardsmen who could be helping first responders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyJones Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's about taking heat off of the phone records issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. Um...how exactly are we going to do this???
Logistically speaking, can this even be done? Did you know that the Mexico/US border is 1,951 miles long?

Massachusetts just declared a state of emergency due to the flooding which will direct some of our National Guard there. Hurricane season will most likely direct a good amount of our Guards to the Gulf and the east coast. Hopefully we won't deal with any major earthquakes or some other type of disaster as well.

How many of our Guards are in Iraq right now? The only articles I can find about this is from 2004 when some states had as many as 60% of their Guards in Iraq! How long are we talking about having Guards along the Mexico border? How many will it take? How many available Guards do we have right now?

We debate the legality of this plan (which is needed) but no one is asking if this is even realistic. I'm banging my head against a wall listening to the MSM discuss this because they don't ask about logistics.

Seriously? How in the hell can this be done and for how long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Hire border guards. Stiffen and enforce laws against hiring
illegal aliens. Add an asset seizure penalty to the law. Businesses will not comply if all they get is a slap on the wrist. Go after what they value the most, material wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. Maybe dubya can find a pile of rubble along the border to stand on
and get a bullhorn to scream out some more lies. This wreaks of doing anything to protect his ass, and divert attention from the spies and the leaks.

His guest workers won't be happy if their amigo's are shot crossing the border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. He's putting the Guard down on the border to seal them.
Dictators don't like it when their subjects do things without government authorization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. I'm uncomfortable with the Bush administration putting so much in
the hands of the military. National Guard, NSA, intelligence programs, Homeland Security...starting to look like positioning for a military coup to me.

I have absolutely no faith and trust that anything they do is for the good of the country and believe that everything they do is for their own unknown purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
26. Your question made me put a tin-foil hat on this morning ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. the question was to spark discussion. In politics, nothing is as it
appears. So any thoughts, even the tin foil ideas need to be aired.

If there is a way for bush to fuck us he will. He is willing to use convoluted legal arguments or just ignore the law. What might seem tin foil now, could be tomorrow's reality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sending the troops to "save" us from yet another bogeyman.
Oh goody. Will we get to see our heroic troops rounding up more women & kids and clapping them into concetration camps to make the populace feel "secure"?

Will they embed reporters to document the "victories" and body counts?

Yet another brilliant stroke of diplomacy by the geniuses in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. Bush's answer for everything is USE THE MILITARY. He's an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. No. It was requested by the states.
Bush is just trying to spin it so he can take credit for this idea when it was Governor Napolitano and Governor Richardson who suggested this long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Depending on how it plays out, He can take credit or
place blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC