Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shocking News From Balitmore Sun Regarding NSA & Spying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 07:18 AM
Original message
Shocking News From Balitmore Sun Regarding NSA & Spying
Shocking, ain't it?

BaltSun: "The National Security Agency developed a pilot program in the late 1990s that would have enabled it to gather and analyze massive amounts of communications data without running afoul of privacy laws. But after the Sept. 11 attacks, it shelved the project -- not because it failed to work -- but because of bureaucratic infighting and a sudden White House expansion of the agency's surveillance powers, according to several intelligence officials."

The shelved program ...

*Used more sophisticated methods of sorting through massive phone and e-mail data to identify suspect communications.
* Identified U.S. phone numbers and other communications data and encrypted them to ensure caller privacy.

* Employed an automated auditing system to monitor how analysts handled the information, in order to prevent misuse and improve efficiency.

* Analyzed the data to identify relationships between callers and chronicle their contacts. Only when evidence of a potential threat had been developed would analysts be able to request decryption of the records.


http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-nsa517,0,5970724.story?coll=bal-home-headlines
via: http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008498.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Late 1990's? - Does This Mean It Was Clinton's Fault?.......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. "...without running afoul of privacy laws."
That's not too much to ask, isn't it? FISA court appoval - that's all we're asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is pretty damning of Hayden
Here was just the sort of program that would allow widepsread analysis but prevent abuse and Hayden scrapped it. Why would he reject a program that both served national security interests and protected the innocent unless he wanted to allow for abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-18-06 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. So as Clinton and Gore both stated a few times we needed to............
....gather information in hopes of staving off any potential terrorist attacks but they actually wanted to do so WITHOUT violating any of our privacy laws. Seems Clinton/Gore took those "terrorist assessment reports" they handed Bush very seriously and set about doing what needed to be done without breaking the law doing it.:wow: OMG, still my beating heart!!!:dem: You mean to tell me that needed information can be gathered without violating the very rights that Americans value so highly????:wow: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC