Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Helen Thomas Takes On "New Kid On The Block" &

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:45 PM
Original message
Helen Thomas Takes On "New Kid On The Block" &
From Colbert's video to the White House briefing room

The exchange, from today's gaggle:

Thomas: The new Italian prime minister says that the president's invasion of Iraq was a grave error. As the new kid on the block, can you give me the latest rationale the U.S. has for invading Iraq?

Snow: There has only been one rationale, as you know, Helen, and this that Saddam Hussein had resisted -- what is the proper number? -- 17 United Nations resolutions, and had refused repeatedly to permit weapons inspectors to do their work, and consistent with that. And also we had cited other concerns in terms of democracy and human rights. That case has never changed. Also the case laid out and voted by the United States Senate --

Thomas: He finds that as a justification to invade a country where we had choke-hold sanctions, satellite surveillance --

Snow: Helen, I'm not going to get in another argument about the -- this is a three-year-old argument and you're trying to reargue the case. The president made his case back then. The United States Senate voted overwhelmingly.

Thomas: He did not make the case.

Snow: Well, in your opinion he didn't make the case. He made the case. He laid out his reasons.

Thomas: He made the case, in your opinion?

Snow: Yes.


http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/10906
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL Helen!!
"...can you give me the latest rationale the U.S. has for invading Iraq? ..."


:rofl: God Bless that Amazing Woman !!! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. LOL, she is ONE of a kind and a treasure to be sure! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. And yet the UN
refused to vote for war, so we went ahead anyway, based upon the resolutions the UN itself wasn't willing to use as a pretext for armed conflict? Since when was the United States authorized to be the U.N.'s personal cowboy vigilante?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. and we are using them again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love the way the tools
say "as you know, Helen"..she damn well does NOT know!

They were 17 million rationals for invading Iraq and it changed every freaked out week, snowman.

PROPS to Helen Thomas..so much smarter than a tony snow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Helen, that is SOOOO "2002" and ya know 911 changed everything."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Go Helen, they can't tell the truth
catch them in their lies and let the public know... End the war now!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why does anyone let them get away with the 'Saddam wouldn't let
the weapons inspectors do their jobs' shit? At first he restricted where they could go but after more threats he gave them unrestricted access to where ever they wanted to search.

It was bush** who told the inspectors to leave. Because he couldn't wait any longer to start dropping bombs on an innocent and defenseless population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mithnanthy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-20-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. acmavm...
You are correct. Saddam didn't throw out the inspectors. The rush to War...was ON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC