Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It was Kathleen Parker, not Bumiller, who said Rove would not be indicted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:47 PM
Original message
It was Kathleen Parker, not Bumiller, who said Rove would not be indicted


I totally screwed up. My apologies to Elizabeth Bumiller and everyone else.

I saw a woman on the The Chris Matthews show say that Rove wouldn't be indicted, but I didn't catch her name. So I went to the show's website, which listed Bumiller as a guest "this week." But the listing was for last weekend.

Mods please delete or modify my earlier post.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. In that case, it really means absolutely nothing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. TownHall.com columnist - she's got as much credibility as Bush himself
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. hey...she's a regular on the OPED page of the Chicago Trib
one of the reasons I finally got around cancelling

all my bird died, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. ....so, who told her to say it? Signs of RW desperation????
If they're spinning does it mean they're worried? Does it mean they know something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. don't delete that valuable post! it was an excellent vehicle for
exposing just HOW horrible a "journalist" Bumiller is

constant reminders of just how un"liberal" purportedly liberal rags like the Times and WashPost are remain a necessary part of trying to make a dent in the constant flood of right wing propaganda that passes for journalism today

look for Bumiller defenders to soon infest this thread, ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good. She is just a RW columnist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick: For visibility (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. No need for apologies
Happens to everyone from time to time. You went to the website and her name was there, so it's an honest mistake. Glad you corrected it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Specifically she said Rove wouldn't be indicted on Monday.
Followed by some weaseling until she might as well not have said anything at all.
And then she sat there with that look of smug satisfaction, waiting for someone to say "very insightful, Kathleen! Here's a treat!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Didn't she start by saying...
something like, "I hate to disappoint you and perhaps most of your viewers, but..."?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wasn't her former gig a home decorating column?
as much cred as O'Bile-y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC