Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nurses vote for new union and find their health benefits no longer cover

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:58 AM
Original message
Nurses vote for new union and find their health benefits no longer cover
their families.

Good Samaritan Hospital in Rockland County, NY is a private Catholic hospital. The nurses decided to go with a new union that promised better benefits. They got it up to a point. The union got them a much better deal on prescription drugs. However in the small print that escaped the members was a provision that will discontinue health insurance and discount medical services at the hospital for the spouses (mostly husbands) and dependent children of the nurses. This leaves families scrambling for insurance -- if they can afford it at all. A lot of men are well into middle age with established medical conditions, making them a greater "risk" and exposing them to premiums that are prohibitive, not to mention the families lose access to group rates even without the pre-existing conditions. And may I emphasize this is a hospital exploiting its nurses and their families. Un-fucking-believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. small print
It pays to read your contracts. They only have themselves to blame. (IMO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sheesh.
Where was the leadership? Did they not read the "small print"? Since that's, you know, their job? What new union is this, and what was the old one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh, I agree. Enough blame to go around.
As a union member, you don't trust management to look after your interests and you keep an eye on your union even more closely. The nurses dropped the ball by trusting wholesale their representatives. Sounds like the new union made a deal with the hospital BEFORE the nurses voted to change representation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. this is the same Catholic church going around telling women
to have more babies? And then not insuring them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Please, explain to me again...
Why don't we have a nationalized health plan like every other civilized industrial country on the planet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. That would be because Congress has been bribed.
> Please, explain to me again why don't we have a nationalized health
> plan like every other civilized industrial country on the planet?

That would be because Congress has been bribed by big insurance,
big pharma, and big hospital to just never quite get around to
joing the 20th century (yes, I mean 20th) in this regard.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Who was their advocate in this?
No way this should have been a surprise. It should have been made clear before they even voted. Now they need a good attorney and a new vote. They got boonswaggled.

T-Grannie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. where was the Union's lawyer and leader?
this should not have been "overlooked".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Shrill or a union
My brother has been fighting a shrill union him and 300 others were tricked into joining. They found this new union's president's resume on monster.com Amongst other things list on his resume was "union buster" and "responsible for breaking nurse's strike"

Yes you need to be carefull before you sign any thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC