Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reporter throws down with DoD official over criticism of coverage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:27 AM
Original message
Reporter throws down with DoD official over criticism of coverage
It's Galloway, excellent Knight Ridder journalist and Di Rita, Rumsfeld puppy. Galloway holds his own but it's really unsettling to see how a govt official exploits his access to try to intimidate the reporter. It would take an exceptional person to withstand the pressures that this sort of exchange would generate. No wonder so many have fallen short.

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2006/5/22/8550/92657

Not much will make sense out of context, but here are snips>

From: Di Rita, Larry, CIV, OSD

Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 6:58 AM
To: Galloway, Joe
Subject:

Your column about gen van riper is just silly, joe. To tag the secretary of defense with being responsible for every sparrow that falls out of every tree is just ludicrous.....

Let's at least be honest about this: there is a lot of change taking place, and that change forces people to re-examine the way we have always done things. That is bumpy, and that can make people anxious.

I don't have any idea what might have happened in van riper's experience with this wargame, but to blame the secretary of defense for it just sounds crazy.

As a journalist, don't you think you owe it to your readers to challenge when people say things like that as though they have firsthand knowledge. Also, you ought to talk with Buck Kernan, who commanded JFCOM at the time.

You're just becoming a johnny one-note and it's only a couple of steps from that to curmudgeon!!

Best....

From galloway in response to DaRita No. 1:

larry: i am delighted that folks over in OSD continue to read my columns with great attention. Who knows, it might make a difference one day.

i've always understood that the guy in charge takes the fall for everything that goes wrong on his watch.

.......much more......

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2006/5/22/8550/92657

(via Atrios)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great e-mail exchange.
Edited on Mon May-22-06 09:24 AM by Jim__
I especially liked Joe Galloway's:

i can wish that your boss had surrounded himself with close advisers who had, once at least, held a dying boy in their arms and watched the life run out of his eyes while they lied to him and told him, over and over, "You are going to be all right. Hang on! Help is coming. Don't quit now..." Such men in place of those who had never known service or combat or the true cost of war, and who pays that price, and had never sent their children off to do that hard and unending duty.


what bothers me most about this admin is the snarling macho chicken hawks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wait'll the guys "3 or 4 levels below" get a load this scape-goating
Edited on Mon May-22-06 10:19 AM by Rose Siding
Di Rita sqeals that it isn't rummy's fault because he wasn't wrapped around everyone's waist when the games went down, and again because the guy in Galloway's article was critical of rums though he had never met the secdef!

Apparently, bushbots have to actually be in. the. room. (on the battlefield, in the cell at abu ghraib, floating in the super dome, AT THE WTC) to bear any responsibility that their positions might have demanded in the last America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. These guys are destroying the military by attrition.
What a mess to clean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And the press- How many other reporters are getting reamed by big hitters?
Edited on Mon May-22-06 10:24 AM by Rose Siding
I wonder if this is SOP - Do high ranking officials regulary chew out reporters, calling their coverage "silly"? It doesn't justify anything, but would certainly explain some of the cowardice within the media.

*constant edits today- I've lost my ability to spel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. On e the war game
In the computer-controlled game, a flotilla of Navy warships and Marine amphibious warfare ships steamed into the Persian Gulf for what Van Riper assumed would be a pre-emptive strike against the country he was defending.

Van Riper resolved to strike first and unconventionally using fast patrol boats and converted pleasure boats fitted with ship-to-ship missiles as well as first generation shore-launched anti-ship cruise missiles. He packed small boats and small propeller aircraft with explosives for one mass wave of suicide attacks against the Blue fleet. Last, the general shut down all radio traffic and sent commands by motorcycle messengers, beyond the reach of the code-breakers.

At the appointed hour he sent hundreds of missiles screaming into the fleet, and dozens of kamikaze boats and planes plunging into the Navy ships in a simultaneous sneak attack that overwhelmed the Navy's much-vaunted defenses based on its Aegis cruisers and their radar controlled Gatling guns.

When the figurative smoke cleared it was found that the Red Forces had sunk 16 Navy ships, including an aircraft carrier. Thousands of Marines and sailors were dead.

The referees stopped the game, which is normal when a victory is won so early. Van Riper assumed that the Blue Force would draw new, better plans and the free play war games would resume.

Instead he learned that the war game was now following a script drafted to ensure a Blue Force victory: He was ordered to turn on all his anti-aircraft radar so it could be destroyed and he was told his forces would not be allowed to shoot down any of the aircraft bringing Blue Force troops ashore.

The Pentagon has never explained. It classified Van Riper's 21-page report criticizing the results and conduct of the rest of the exercise, along with the report of another DOD observer. Pentagon officials have not released Joint Forces Command's own report on the exercise.

Van Riper walked out and didn't come back. He was furious that the war game had turned from an honest, open free play test of America's war-fighting capabilities into a rigidly controlled and scripted exercise meant to end in an overwhelming American victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Van Riper didn't realize they were playing under GOP rules
"If you aren't winning, change the rules"

Clever of the Pentagon to switch up the colors like that ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a great email exchange. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. where were these types of questions from WH press corps?
Oh yeah, Hellen is not a gay male prostitute and will never be allowed to ask her silly questions, nor will any real journalist like Galloway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC