Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Froomkin: White House at Cross Purposes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:06 PM
Original message
Froomkin: White House at Cross Purposes
Edited on Mon May-22-06 03:53 PM by newyawker99
As President Bush's traditional allies fall away, there are signs that the curtain that has been so successfully drawn around the inner workings of the White House for so long is coming down, too.

Two recent glimpses into how the White House does business suggest that staffers are sometimes working at cross-purposes -- or, as Ronald Reagan once famously put it at a Gridiron Dinner, sometimes its right hand doesn't know what its far-right hand is doing.

In Sunday's Washington Post, Jonathan Weisman and Jim VandeHei tell this amazing story: "While President Bush was on the U.S.-Mexican border Thursday promoting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, Senate conservatives were persuading a team of White House aides to deny 200,000 low-skilled immigrants citizenship."

That happened in a series of private meetings with lower-level aides.

The result: "After 8 p.m., a succession of conservatives went to the Senate floor to declare Bush's support for their amendment to ensure that temporary work visas really would be temporary."

more at link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/04/11/LI2005041100879.html
-------------------------------------

EDIT: COPYRIGHT. PLEASE POST ONLY 4 OR 5 PARAGRAPHS
FROM THE COPYRIGHTED NEWS SOURCE PER DU RULES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Many Rightwingers are claiming the White House
wanted them to put in that Felony provision. more of the same?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC