Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have we let things go too far?...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:12 PM
Original message
Poll question: Have we let things go too far?...
Have we already let this crooked, illegitimate, fascist regime become too well entrenched to take our country back working WITHIN the system? If not how will we get it back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. it has always been around,but now in deep, it will take decades
to clean out loyal nests of vipers. A long, long road ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Other
I'm counting on the backlash being so severe as to rip their spines right out of thier bodies Just like in the AAAAHHHNOLD movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I truly think the WH Idiot and his handlers have done it...............
.....this time. If we can turn this around, and I'm not convinced just yet that we can, but IF we can turn this around I think it will take decades at the very least. There is just too much going on behind the scenes that we still don't know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We have 2 get the voting machines
before we can even dream of turning it around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Excuse me but have you heard of "Diebold" recently?? Yes, I...........
....fully intend to vote but a third stolen election wouldn't surprise me at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. We Already Had 3 Stolen Elections in a Row. Think They'll Go for 4?
We were robbed and murdered in 2000:
RIP

We were robbed and murdered in 2002:



We were robbed in 2004:



Guess what they are going to try to do this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. You're right it has already been 3 stolen elections, wow how time.........
....flies when we're living through hell itself. Thank for the correction and thank you for that tribute to Wellstone.:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. It all depends on the evoting machines.
IF we have to vote on those with no paper receit....the country is GONE. As it stands now, IF we win in November (again, that will depend on the voting machines) it will take GENERATIONS to undo all the damage they have done. The ONLY WAY to get our country back is to LET THE PEOPLE VOTE. ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE. That's all it will take because the sheeple are waking up, finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. i said "no, we'll vote them out"; BUT,
it's not going to be as simple as that.

they will still control the media, the courts, and they'll always have a big money advantage (yes, dems are raising more; that just means the ultra-rich banana republicans will have to learn to dig deeper.)

i also doubt that we'll pull it off in 2006. we'll come close, but the banana republicans will mount enough of a campaign to hold congress, or at least the senate. it's 2008 that i expect to be the watershed election. i think then we will sweep the white house and both houses of congress, and in a fairly big way.

but even then, we'll have at best the clinton treatment -- the press will be finding scandals in every penny spent, lies in every statement, etc., forgetting what they tolerated when shrub was president....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's important that we not...
Edited on Mon May-22-06 05:43 PM by Mr_Jefferson_24
...lose hope and no one should let these poll results discourage them from voting. If Neocons are going to steal elections again this November we need to force their hand, make them make mistakes, expose them. At the same time it seems clear that we also need to start serious organizing for a revolution of nonviolent noncooperation with this crooked, PNAC driven, Neocon regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. i'm not losing hope -- in the long run, it'll all work out, i believe
i think not quite winning in 2006 (picking up seats but not control of either house) might be the best thing for us. not that i'd deliberately want to try to thread that needle. of course, i wouldn't mind a blow out election(!)

but the combination of bare minimum banana republican majorities in both houses and a very lame duck in the oval office will leave voters with no one to punish in 2008 except the banana republicans. this might lead to the once-in-a-lifetime kind of political sweep like fdr in 1932. of course, we have to hope the banana republicans don't bring on a depression first....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. I voted the same thing
vote them out, we have to get them out, prosecuting reporters???? they are gathering up dissenters. We have to get these people out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think our democratic republic is toast.
They will manipulate the vote during the dem primaries & put in a DLC candidate that they can work with - one who is pro-war & pro-corporate. This dem candidate will win the '08 selection. By having the dems win the presidency, it will quell the debate about electronic voting for many people -- people who do not realize that when they control the voting machines they control who the party candidates will be, too.

Holy shit, I've become so jaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Not steeping yourself in deep denial...
...as so many American sheeple have chosen to do does not make you jaded, CrispyQGirl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
70. I believe Jeb Bush
will run and they will outright steal it in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tiananmen Square baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. We may have no choice. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. "Four dead in Ohio."
This is a tragedy, not a celebration.

Sadly, Mr_Jefferson_24 may be right. We may have no choice but to resort to this.

My biggest fear is that we won't.

~heavy heart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I remember it quite well.
I am not suggesting this as a frat party, I am stating as the time has come and the link I provided demonstrates the spirit that the people at Tiananmen Square displayed prior to the massacre. I suggest we make the powers that be show their hand and if their solution is the same as KSU, I am old it is nothing to me. I am sure there are enough old timers here like me who are willing to stand their ground for our country, our cause and our freedom. Our leaders aren't, soon will come the time when we will have to decide to take democracy unto ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. I read the title of your post to be somewhat cavalier, so
thanks for explaing that. ;)

Do we have enough people with spirit to fight this thing? I beleive that we will not take back our country without bloodshed & I wonder if Americans are up to the task.


Consent of the governed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
987654321 Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I hate to think this, but...
A part of me wonders if the system has been too badly infected to save. I think chances are that if the Democrats don't take back Congress in the next election, the corporate criminals will work overtime to make sure they get everything they want as quickly as possible, regardless of the health of our country.

I use the terms infected and health because I equate what has been going on as a type of a cancer spreading through our government and country as well. Let's face it, they have crippled our federal government's ability to function properly. FEMA is a lost cause. The Attorney General has managed to get rid of everyone there who had one ounce of integrity. The military is filled with Rummy clones, people more committed to spying on Americans than on taking care of our veterans. They have also committed to filling the federal judiciary with judges sympathetic to their beliefs. They have also been able to take over the mass news media, while trying to intimidate anyone who might actually have the guts to take them on by threatening them with federal prosecution. I could go on and on, but I'm not saying anything all of us here who care to find out the truth doesn't already know.

I just don't think it looks promising and I really can see very little that can be done in the short term to make a lot of the changes needed other than taking back Congress. And even then that will only slow the bleeding for a while until the next Presidential elections. If things can be corrected within the system, I think it will take a couple of decades at best.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
57. "I equate what...
...has been going on as a type of a cancer spreading through our government and country as well."

Well said, I couldn't agree more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Jacobin Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
76. Infected too badly to save?
If your mother, wife, lover, daughter were told they had terminal cancer would your advice be that they just kill themselves?

No fucking way.

Someone else said it much better than I ever will about the slow death of one you love and how they should react to it. I say we should react the exact same way to the dying of American democracy.

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. What National Place do we have the most like Tiananmen
We go there to the National Mall and we cram it full of citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. We should try to choose a...
...place that would make a repeat of Tiananmen difficult for BushCo's Mercenary Militia members to carry out. They are capable of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's already too late.....all we can do now is survive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
50. yes nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. The pendulum will swing back,
No argument that this has been a drastic right wing swing but the momentum back has already begun. There is a fairly large fringe element that will stick it out with this administration regardless of how bad things become but a majority of the American people want to live in the center and they always eventually wake-up and find their senses. Talk to moderate Republicans, Independents, conservative Democrats, read the polls, it is already happening. We survived the Civil War, the Great Depression, WWII, Vietnam and Watergate and we will survive Iraq and King Chimpy. Keep the faith, keep working for the good guys and never give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Normally I'd agree, but
the pendulum can't swing if it is artificially stopped by rigged voting ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. depends what you call surviving
we need to stop all this surviving and start really living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm for that. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Define "We." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. For the purposes of this poll...
Edited on Mon May-22-06 06:04 PM by Mr_Jefferson_24
...let's define "we" loosely as any and all American citizens working toward removing the current crooked, illegitimate, PNAC driven, Neocon regime and restoring democracy to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yes - it's too deeply entrenched.
The courts showed us what they were made of in 2000; have they gotten better?

The military has been under Rumsfeld for 6 years; what are the implications for
the senior officers and NCOs? What about the junior officers?

The executive branch has been deeply changed.

The legislative branch has been tainted by many scandals.

The public despairs of an honest vote.

The media is far from honest.

From what seed can renewal sprout? From whence will the honest,
dedicated stewards come? How will reform be accomplished?

I question whether I will live to see the infection cured. I
wonder if any of us will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. The whole system is corrupt. Time to change it.
This alleged "democracy" has, for too long, beeng a de facto oligarchy. Run by the rich and influential.

Unfortunately, those in a position to actually change that fact are the very ones benefitting from the myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm not sure. I think with the internet
that information is much harder to suppress. I've been astounded at what people know and widespread information is. I get pessimistic because they've fired or forced out the base of our civil servants and replaced them with political hacks. There are too many who are bought and paid for and will work to coverup and enable the continuuation of the corruption. Still, I have hope that too many will just get fed up and the election will be so overwhelming to oust these crooks that they can't steal it.

The part of your question that media will finally report the news made me laugh out loud. We've lost the MSM. They are buying the only media that actually reported the news. Our only hope is the internet and alternative media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. One of the Craftiest Lies ever told was that the People
ran the nation. We never have and never will. And while BushCo is the worst thing that could have happened in the 2000, he's simply stepped up to the plate following the rest of the Batting Order of evil, corrupt, morally bankrupt Rulers who have committed acts *at least* as evil and in mnay cases worse...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. This Cabal of Crooks and Psychopaths will have to be driven out
before an angry mob and frog marched straight to the Hague to stand trial for Crimes Against Humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Doesn't corporate owned MSM...
...call us the "pitchfork brigade?" Seems to me it was the pitchfork brigade in the Ukraine that took back their country from elements who stole a national election a couple years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. kicked & nominated
We need to kick the hell out of this poll & send the results AND comments to our dem leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. Wow
The results so far aren't exactly bursting with optimism. I was kind of hoping more of you were more hopeful.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. We're hoping you are!!!
;)


Please, share with us your hopes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. To see reality for what it is...
Edited on Mon May-22-06 09:51 PM by Mr_Jefferson_24
...should be taken as a healthy sign, should it not? It doesn't have to mean loss of hope, and shouldn't. And I'll say it again, please, please don't anyone let these poll results discourage you from voting. Firstly, it may be possible that we can vote them out (we don't know for sure) and secondly, even if it isn't, to give up and not force them to steal it throws away our chance to catch and corner them in the act, and possibly expose them for all to see.

Take these poll results as just a check to see if we're generally on the same page in our perception of what we're up against. I'm encouraged that we seem to be.

And never, NEVER give up hope:

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0521-20.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
68. Hope was a fantasy I once had
I don't need to believe in anything. If you can understand the phrase "hope springs eternal" then you understand that giving up is just a set up for being able to try again. Hope is at one bitter end and wishes and desires at the other of this thing some know as faith. None of which I have embraced since I came to understanding of only being able to to do best one can do is all we or anyone else can do. The rest is already accounted for :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
35. I voted 'other'.
Because when this lunatic regime decides to use bunker buster nukes in Iran - The sane citizens will use pitchforks, torches, and whatever other forms of artillary at our disposal to depose the pretender.

I hope the honorable military does it for us, but w/o their support I will refer to the methods the forefathers of this country used.

Just sayin'....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
40. "We" didn't "let" anything.
"We" have fought it tooth and nail.

Has it gone too far? Yes. But it's not our fault. DU has never been passive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Maybe my wording could have been better...
...I wasn't pointing a finger of blame at anybody.

An earlier poster asked me to define "we," (see post #19).

Now I'll define "let" for the purposes of this poll to merely mean "failed to prevent," which is not to suggest meaningful efforts have not been made.

Let's face it, we're up against very powerful, ruthless people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
43. It was already too late on December 13th, 2000.
It was already too late on December 13th, 2000. *THE MINUTE*
that the Supreme Court decided the election, we all should
have risen up in revolt.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyDiaper Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
44. Have faith in the career feds.
Edited on Tue May-23-06 08:57 AM by NastyDiaper
A: "No, our judiciary and coming indictments will be their undoing" imo

The civilian politicians at the top will get their due. Their incompetence even as criminals is leading their undoing.

Recovering from the debt and entrenched bad world opinion will be more difficult than replacing all these crooks.

I am concerned that Cheney will throw a tantrum and do something crazy in Iran. But I don't think it likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. You may be right. It certainly was Nixon's undoing. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyDiaper Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #44
78. GOGO Career Feds!
FBI's Raid on Jefferson's Office: The Shot Heard 'Round the Hill
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/000717.php

Save us before it's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
45. Recipe for Defeatism
Nice to know that by a vast majority Democratic Underground thinks there is either definately or probably no hope. Kind of uplifting.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. I know. Mass suicide anyone?
At least then the cause would get some MSM coverage. Maybe Pitt will come back to compose our note for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. Please see post #34. Thanks. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Yeah - it's kind of crap.
There's hope in that we all seem to agree that there is no hope? What is that?

It's one thing to say that taking back America will be an uphill climb and another to say that it's too late. One leaves the door open, and the other doesn't.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. The poll asks essentially...
...if people believe it is realistic to think it can be done working WITHIN the system, not whether they think it can be done at all. Given what we've witnessed take place in this country since 2000, I think this is a fair and worthy poll question.

I've heard insanity described as "trying over and over to accomplish something using the same methodology over and over, which has been demonstrated over and over NOT to work." If people's perceptions about our chances of success in taking our country back working within the system are accurate, then these results would imply it's time to put our collective creativity to work and devise alternative methodologies that would amount to working technically outside the system. For example, tactics built around massive nonviolent, noncooperation. Gandhi, King and other great leaders from the past have demonstrated their effectiveness.

This is not to argue for the abandonment of everything we've been doing, only to be realistic and honest about what we're facing and what kinds of things might have a chance to work. Here's a good start:

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0602-08.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. I guess it depends on why you think things are bad
I mean if you believe, for example, that Democrats are pretty much as bad as Republicans, well, this argument makes sense.

If you see little difference between a Clinton and a Bush, than I agree, the system will need to be torn up and replaced by something else.

But I don't happen to believe that. I believe that there is a world of difference between Democrats and Republicans, as I believe there is a world of difference between sanity and insanity.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Huh?
Edited on Tue May-23-06 11:17 AM by Mr_Jefferson_24
I must've missed something. How is this relevant?

For the record, I think there's a huge difference between Democrats and the Neocon controlled Republican party, also, I believe Clinton and Bush are nothing alike.

I still don't see what these questions have to do with this poll, or your contention that it is a "recipe for defeatism."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. OK than allow me to spell it out
If there are two parties and one of them is much better than the other, than we just need to get the better party elected - there's no reason to move outside the system, just work the system better.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Assuming free and fair...
Edited on Tue May-23-06 11:26 AM by Mr_Jefferson_24
...elections, which most DUers (including myself) participating in this poll don't seem to regard as a very safe assumption, I would be in complete agreement with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. I'm not certain they will be clean myself
But that is still matter of smoothign out the kinks of this system, not tossing it for something new.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. So when you look at...
...the changes that have taken place in our country, particularly our government, over the past five years, THAT'S your assessment---we have a few kinks in the system to smooth out?

I wonder if you'd be open to entertaining the possibility that maybe, just maybe, you might be understating the seriousness of the problems and the dangers, posed by the despots we're facing a wee little bit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Well perhaps there is a place between a few kinks and
needing to start over (because the current situation is helpless) that would be more accurate.

I do like your condescending tone, though - that always helps me see the error of my ways.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. I don't believe I've taken...
...a condescending tone with you, Bryant, but since you do, I'll apologize just the same. I'm sorry if that's the way any of my remarks came across.

It looks to me like you may be interpreting the idea of working outside the system as being the same as tearing down the system of government our founding fathers set up and starting over completely from scratch. That's not what anyone here is suggesting. It's about stepping outside our system that has been intentionally so crippled by BushCo, to restore what our founding fathers put in place. Perhaps I didn't make that clear enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. It's amusing to watch people deny the obvious
But since you feel you've apologized I guess I'll just accept your apology.

At any rate, I don't know if you want to tear down the system - I do know that the start of this conversation is that there is no hope to save the system from within. That leads us to extreme measures - you seem committed to non-violence, as your article suggests. I'm not going to speculate on the likelihood on those methods working, but I would place my money on Democrats winning back the Congress and the White House.

The problem is once you say that the system is done and cannot work, you automatically create the rationale not just for your peaceful non-violent general strikes and what not, but also for methods you would presumably be horrified.

That's not to say that I favor faith in the system because I don't want to see violence - I have faith in the system because I have faith in the system. It's not perfect, of course, and the Bush Adminsitration has done serious damage to it - but it can be repaired without moving outside of it.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. "At any rate, I don't know if you want...
...to tear down the system."
---BushCo has already torn down the system, I only seek to restore it.

"I do know that the start of this conversation is that there is no hope to save the system from within."
---This is the consensus opinion of roughly 85% of your fellow DUers who participated in this poll.

"That leads us to extreme measures..."
---I think I'm safe in asserting that most people would not consider the methods and teachings of Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther King to be extreme.

"The problem is once you say that the system is done and cannot work..."
---Actually, the problem is I never made this statement or anything like it, and your amazing leap to suggest peaceful methods of nonviolent, noncooperation somehow go hand-in-hand with, or lead to, violent revolution is unfounded.

"I have faith in the system because I have faith in the system."
---What system is that? BushCo has all but shredded our Constitution. You have faith in a system that's been disabled to the point of dysfunction.

"...it can be repaired without moving outside of it."
---This is your opinion. The vast majority of your fellow DUers, if these poll results are generally represetative of DU opinion at large, do not agree. That said, I most earnestly hope it is you who are correct on this score.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Ok, a few questions
1. Explain to me the distinction between me saying "the system is done and cannot work" and you saying "BushCo has already torn down the system" and "BushCo has all but shredded our Constitution. You have faith in a system that's been disabled to the point of dysfunction." (just to pick two comments from your own reply).

2. How many people are going to have to participate in the teachings of Mahatama Gandhi or Martin Luther King for this form of change to be effective? How close are you to forming that critical mass?

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. The statement:
"The system is done and cannot work," is your statement and, like so much of what you put forth, doesn't really seem to make sense. The system is done? What is that supposed to mean? I would distinguish my statements you've cited from yours in that mine are, unlike yours, self explanatory.

For methods of nonviolent noncooperation to be effective there must be massive participation, and I would imagine I'm about as close to forming that critical mass of citizen participation as you are to ensuring we'll have free and fair elections in November.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Your saying you don't understand what I mean by
"the system is done and cannot work?"

That's an odd admission to make, particularly since the statement is pretty easy to understand.

I mean that the system is done and cannot work - it has been so corrupted by Bush, that the system will have to be replaced - perhaps, as you say, by the original intent of the framers - a rebirth of what our nation should be.

I don't want to claim to have done a lot to ensure that we have free and fair elections (a donation here and there, and talking to my circle of friends) but I think getting reasonably free and fair elections is a much more doable option, compared to massive participation in nonviolent noncooperation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. This doesn't seem to have
...evolved into a very productive exchange, Bryant, so this will be my last response.

Thanks for your input and good luck to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #75
77. I guess we have different standards of what a productive exchange
entails. For example, I don't expect that every productive exchange ends with my victory.

But whatever. Good luck to you as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
52. We've voted them out before, we can do it again
History does repeat itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. I sincerely hope you are right. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
61. This year we stand on the Razors Edge. 2 things will
determine if we can take back what is ours, or lose it forever. The election in November and whether or not journalists start getting arrested for whistle-blowing. If the election is stolen again and the press fears reprisals for printing the truth, we are.. well... fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
62. Throughout history violent revolutions have taken back democracy
And IMO thatll be the only way to get ours back, sad to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
63. They want you to think it's hopeless.
That's the only way they can sustain their reign of corruption.

Things aren't hopeless now. They never are, and never were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. I agree. They would love to make...
...things look so bad, so scary that we just stop fighting. We can't do that. Not an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
73. Gotta get other branches of government to do their damn job
and serve papers for laws broken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC