Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faculty committee report on Duke students' disciplinary records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:54 PM
Original message
Faculty committee report on Duke students' disciplinary records
http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/opinion/article_21220054.shtml

Atlantic Monthly online has a report by Stuart Taylor, Jr. on the Duke rape case which unfortunately is only accessible to subscribers. But substantial excerpts are reported at the link above. One of the points addressed is that a faculty committee, which was designated to look into accusations of previous misconduct by students on the lacrosse team, issued a report on May 1.

"Alcohol aside, this report's findings are a stunning vindication of the characters of a group of kids who have been smeared from coast to coast as racist, sexist, thuggish louts. Here are some conclusions of the committee -- chaired by James Coleman, a liberal, African-American law professor at Duke -- that the national media have largely ignored:

"'None of the misconduct involved fighting, sexual assault or harassment, or racist slurs.' There was no evidence 'that the cohesiveness of this group is either racist or sexist.' The 'current as well as former African-American members of the team have been extremely positive about the support the team provided them.' The lacrosse players' 'behavior on trips is described as exemplary.' They are 'respectful of people who serve the team, including bus drivers, airline personnel, trainers, the equipment manager, the team manager, and the groundskeeper.' They are polite, nondisruptive students who have 'performed well academically.'

SNIP

"Speaking of character, how likely is it that the more than 40 kids described by Kimel and the Coleman report could have maintained an airtight cover-up since March 14 of a gang rape in a small, crowded house, with not one heeding pleas by parents and lawyers to protect himself by fingering any guilty parties?

"And what of various team members' handing over evidence sought by police three long days after the alleged rape, such as the accuser's fake fingernails? And of offers to take polygraph tests (which Nifong spurned)? And of other conduct inconsistent with any cover-up?

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice kids have black strippers at booze party? How about
enlisting for Iraq or building a Habitat for Humanity? I know, boys will be boys. Gag me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not sure what the race of the strippers would have to do with
Edited on Wed May-24-06 08:09 PM by pnwmom
how "nice" the students are. Would it have been nicer of them to have had white strippers? According to what you know, did they ask for black strippers? I hadn't heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. protect himself by fingering any guilty parties?

Hmmm... I don't buy that "eye for an eye" stuff.

Let any guilty parties be punished in the normal manner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC