Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court to decide status of sins: Couple revealed misdeeds to their church

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:38 PM
Original message
Court to decide status of sins: Couple revealed misdeeds to their church
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/052606dnmetwatermark.21192740.html

Does a church have the right to publicly reveal a person’s private sin? A Dallas court is being asked to decide whether Watermark Community Church can do exactly that to a man and a woman identified in court records only as “John Doe” and “Jane Roe.”

Their attorney says that the pair thought they had revealed their sins to the pastor confidentially and that their behavior should not be public. Church officials say they are only following a process of church discipline outlined in the Gospel of Matthew – a process written into the church’s bylaws. “Basically, we’re being sued because were seeking to love John Doe in accordance with the principles outlined by God’s word.” the Rev. Todd Wagner said.

In this case, the man refused the private interventions and said he was quitting the church. But Watermark’s bylaws say a member “may not resign from membership in an attempt to avoid such care and correction.”

Watermark’s next step would have been to send out more than a dozen letters to people who know “Mr. Doe” – half to Watermark members and half to members of other churches who know and have worked with “Mr. Doe.” That’s when the lawsuit was filed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's One Of The Sickest Things I've Ever Heard.
What a bunch of controlling freaks they are. This is beyond ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's effed up.
Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Frickin' cult.
I hope they bankrupt that 'church'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's OK, because Todd Wagner's "Not a REAL Christian"...
No, he must be one of them Calvinist guys, only without the stuffed tiger...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. May not resign from membership?
Is it a jail or a church?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Jail, with velvet tapestries on the hard, cold concrete walls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. may not resign from membership in an attempt to avoid ...
such care and correction? Do they think they're the Spanish Inquisition? Well, nobody would expect that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. My former pastor told a young man and his fiancee
that they had to stand up and publicly apologize for "living in sin" during the Sunday morning service (attended by roughly 2500 people,) or they would not be allowed to marry in the church. They did it. I can only imagine that the parents really wanted that wedding in the church building.

This happened probably 15 years ago; it was the reason why I walked out of my fundamentalist church and never went back. If you were a big dollar donor or board member, your "sins" were overlooked. If you were not, you were expected to toe the line or you'd be publicly embarrassed.

I can't believe people are still subjecting themselves to this.
Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drhilarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why the hell do you think confession exists in the first place?
It was quite lucrative for the early church to lord the sins of its parishioners over their heads. It's always been a racket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sable302 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. actually
in the early church, full public confession was the norm. It was later on in the middle ages that the church began to institute private confession, therefore saving the more well respected parishioners from the embarrassment of the more public version.

It seems that this fundie operation wants to return to the more 'biblically authentic' format.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. blackmail potential, i always figured
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizdum Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's is a serious breach of ministerial duty to reveal the private sins...
...of a congregant to the law or other members of the congregation. The pastor responsible should be defrocked. It is up to the pastor to persuade that person to do the right thing by turning themselves in perhaps, but not to turn the person in. This sounds like a pretty screwed up Church if you ask me. But there are lots of them out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. sick control freaks full of fear
and no wonder, no surprise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wait, isn't there an expected right to privacy when you confide in your
priest/pastor/rabbi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The passage they are using:"treat him as a pagan or tax collector"
Edited on Fri May-26-06 08:45 AM by rainbow4321
(from same article):

Watermark Community church says it relies on this New Testament passage to justify its policy of disciplining members:

"If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over. But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector."

Matthew 18:15-17
------------------------

http://www.watermark.org/events/events.asp

http://www.watermark.org/ministry/help.asp

And these are from their website...long list of the church's support/help groups. Lot of good these groups do if everyone will be afraid to share anything after all of this. Wonder if the couple started out in one of these help groups?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC