Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm glad Hayden is out of the NSA.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:02 AM
Original message
I'm glad Hayden is out of the NSA.
Edited on Fri May-26-06 10:03 AM by rpgamerd00d
I'd rather see him standing in an unemployment line (or preferably, in a chow line at Leavenworth), but the CIA puts him out of the domestic spying business, as the CIA isn't set up to operate on US soil.

Question is: Who will take over at the NSA ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dude. The NSA isn't set up to operate on US soil either.
That didn't stop them.

...FBI's supposed to handle the domestic stuff. But with the perpetual war for perpetual peace thing, a lot of people have just plain forgotten. I can totally understand, because it's not like the administration makes a show of respecting such fine legalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Has AT&T supplied info to the CIA? No, it was to the NSA.
There is theory, and then there is reality.

Theory: NSA and CIA are supposed to operate outside US. NSA is operating inside, CIA could too.
Reality: NSA is operating inside the US, no evidence of CIA operating in US.

Could that change with Hayden running the CIA?
Sure.

But at least he is out of the operation of the crimes we already know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, I hope you're right and all, just not counting on it.
The CIA would be run by someone Bush wants and trusts whether it's Hayden or not so, it's not like I have a solution to the problem for the rest of the term. Of course, I have no idea who's going to replace him at the NSA either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetheonlyway Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. dude....
Hayden is at the CIA to shut it down and divert it's resources to Rummy in the pentagon and to continue full on spying on domestic soil....

let's be very clear here..... his role at the CIA is to keep the well trained assassins happy enough to not go on a bounty hunting expedition within the whitehouse.... he's basically a glorified babysitter....

good luck.. i know some pretty pissed off CIA agents....you know, the honorable kind that bemoan the haphazard bush nonleadership of their organization....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I think any CIA agents who would be inclined to go bounty hunting
"off the reservation" had already left when Goss was put in charge. There is, it seems, a CIA "in exile." Many who left seemingly couldn't stomach Bushco's plans for the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetheonlyway Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I certainly hope so...
but where are they now?

their country needs them to go bounty hunting....

now!!! not later... now!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I disagree.
Edited on Fri May-26-06 10:10 AM by sparosnare
I think his placement with the CIA is a step in creating a super-itelligence organization, a merge of sorts with the NSA and CIA and Pentagon. I fully expect the CIA to be granted the power to operate within the boundaries of the US (perhaps already has). Of course the operations would be covert, so we'd never know:

"The administration's decisions to rely on a small circle of lawyers for legal interpretations that justify the CIA's covert programs and not to consult widely with Congress on them have also helped insulate the efforts from the growing furor, said several sources who have been involved.

Bush has never publicly confirmed the existence of a covert program, but he was recently forced to defend the approach in general terms, citing his wartime responsibilities to protect the nation. In November, responding to questions about the CIA's clandestine prisons, he said the nation must defend against an enemy that "lurks and plots and plans and wants to hurt America again."

This month he went into more detail, defending the National Security Agency's warrantless eavesdropping within the United States. That program is separate from the GST program, but three lawyers involved said the legal rationale for the NSA program is essentially the same one used to support GST, which is an abbreviation of a classified code name for the umbrella covert action program."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/29/AR2005122901585.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, now he can do for HUMINT what he did for SIGINT
In other words, set up a human spying operation here in the USA. A Stasi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleRob Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. yean. and I am anxiously awaiting for the Great Pumpkin....
Hayden has not hesitated to disregard the law at NSA - what makes you think it will be any different at his new post? It's not like he will have to worry about congressional oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
987654321 Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. I would have rather had him stay at the NSA
That is if we couldn't get rid of him altogether.
The thing is that the NSA, being completely run by the White House/Military, is so politicized it's pathetic. Everyone in the NSA stays in line with everything they are told. The CIA, though more politicized than it has been in quite a while, has too many wild cards involved. Some there are not in line with Bush's actions. Many there are downright angry over some of the things the administration has done. Well having the General take over will change that, and it is my opinion that the whole agency will become subservient to the NSA.

It would almost be like a step down for Hayden, in a way, except he is a good little soldier who understands the big picture. That big picture is the complete consolidation of power for the military industrial complex and the corporate criminals that run our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Umm, go reread the Patriot Act
There is a provision that was put in there specifically to enable the CIA to operate domestically.

It doesn't matter where he is, or which alphabet agency he's directing, Hayden is just one more fascist member of the Bush regime out to strip this country of all that once made it great. He's going to continue to do his dirty work no matter where he is, unless of course he's in that chowline in Leavenworth you mentioned. That would be the best place to put him, but sadly that's not going to happen until Bushco is out of power, if ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sludge Flash: Beloved Leader** Taps Ralph Reed to Head NSA (jk)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC