Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coming soon to The New York Times? Globe reports Bush marriage breakup

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:25 AM
Original message
Coming soon to The New York Times? Globe reports Bush marriage breakup
Coming soon to The New York Times? Globe reports Bush marriage breakup

Summary: In Patrick Healy's recent front-page New York Times article on the state of the Clintons' marriage, Healy noted that a "tabloid photograph" of former President Bill Clinton "was enough to fuel coverage in the gossip pages." Media Matters does not endorse the decision by elite media figures to take their cues from tabloids, but if they do so, we expect them to be consistent. As it happens, the cover of the May 29 edition of the Globe magazine contains a headline about another high-profile political couple: "BUSH MARRIAGE BREAKUP! EXCLUSIVE! SEPARATE LIVES IN THE WHITE HOUSE."

..............

Media Matters does not endorse the decision by The New York Times, NBC's Tim Russert, MSNBC's Chris Matthews, The Washington Post's David Broder, and countless other elite media figures to take their cues from tabloids like the Globe, or to pry into the personal lives of political figures. But if they are going to do so, we expect them to be consistent.

As it happens, the cover of the May 29 edition of the Globe contains another sensational headline about another high-profile political couple:

BUSH MARRIAGE BREAKUP!

EXCLUSIVE!

SEPARATE LIVES IN THE WHITE HOUSE

Nasty fights

Booze problems
Laura urges counseling

Media Matters wonders when we can expect The New York Times to assign a reporter to tally the number of nights the Bushes spend together and to conduct 50 interviews with Republicans to assess their interest in the state of the Bush marriage, or in President Bush's reported relapse -- and when it will run a 2,000-word front-page article on the topic. If it does so, we wonder if Broder will refer to the article as "anything but unsympathetic" to the Bushes.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200605260003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, DU scooped this one by a couple of months
when observant people noticed Stupid's wedding ring was absent.

Of course, by the time the late 50s arrive, most couples that have stayed together are leading fairly separate lives. It's why the transition to the retirement years and finding oneself confronted by 24/7 togetherness is such a challenge.

I don't know how or why anyone stays married, except that in my case inertia played a big part in the 15 year longevity of it.

Whatever they do with each other, they're welcome to it. It's none of my business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Saw this yesterday at grocery checkout
As another poster mentioned, Bush has been without his wedding ring for some time. Laura probably got tired of living with a stupid coke head drunken frat boy. We will se what happens after '09'. Don't expect the tabloids to dog the Bushes as they did the Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsndust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I was in the checkout line too... my kids came up and said...
look daddy, that paper says the bushes split up! Then my son says "I wish he'd just go back to Texas where he belongs!" (my son is 12) I looked at him and said "he ain't no real Texan".
The lady at the register chuckled a little bit. Then I said to my kids, "he belongs in prison as a war criminal". The clerk really laughed out loud then, and agreed with me. Keep in mind, this is in Hicktown Tennessee, only 4 counties smaller than ours.

People are starting to wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, Warpy,
I'll tell you why people can happily stay married. It's because they become best friends. No one ever should get married in the first place unless it's to someone who can be their best friend. People who are married for many years to their best friend evolve a symbiotic relationship with them. It never gets boring, although it does become as comfortable as wrapping yourself in an old, well-worn bathrobe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Alas, sometimes they find better friends along the way
and booze and drugs top the list, followed by sweet young things.

Try not to be so smug, willya? Shit happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not trying to be smug. I'm sorry if it came across that way.
Both people have to feel the same way. It doesn't work on a one-way street. Some people who want to make it work aren't lucky enough to have a partner who is as dedicated. I know lot of people who've been unlucky with cheating partners.

For a lot of other people, though, it works and those are the people who stay married. I know lots of people who have been happily married for 30, 40, 50 years and even longer. My own parents were married for 62 years. I believe it has everything to do with being each other's best friend. It sure can't work unless both partners feel the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right..Fair and balanced, fair and balanced.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC