Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Walton's Order (5/26/06): Reporters Must Give Libby Documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:10 PM
Original message
Judge Walton's Order (5/26/06): Reporters Must Give Libby Documents
Edited on Fri May-26-06 01:14 PM by kpete
Judy doesn’t have to turn over her notebooks to Scoots. But Time magazine has to turn over their shit.

Judge: Reporters Must Give Libby Documents

By TONI LOCY
The Associated Press
Friday, May 26, 2006; 1:57 PM

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday ordered Time magazine to turn over documents for a former White House aide to use in his defense to perjury and other charges in the CIA leak case.

The order by U.S. District Reggie B. Walton also said the New York Times might have to turn over some information but reduced the scope of documents the newspaper and other news organizations would have to provide to lawyers for the defendant, former top vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

Citing a lack of relevancy, Walton said that Judith Miller, a former Times reporter, doesn't have to provide two notebooks, her phone records or appointment calendars to lawyers for Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff.

Walton also said NBC News does not have to provide Libby's defense team with one page of undated notes taken by correspondent Andrea Mitchell because she is unlikely to testify at Libby's perjury trial, which is set for January.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/26/AR2006052600981.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/documents/judgewalto_052606.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Judge Walton *GETS IT*
At trial, Libby's lawyers will try to raise questions about the credibility of Miller, Russert and Cooper and whether they could have learned about Plame and her CIA connection from other reporters at their respective news organizations or government officials besides Libby.

"These three news reporters did not simply report on alleged criminal activity, but rather they were personally involved in the conversations with the defendant that form the predicate for several charges in the indictment," Walton wrote. "Their testimony is critical to the government's case, and challenging it will likely be critical to the defense."


I feel like I've been screaming this for nearly three years.

These reporters are not protecting sources, they're protecting criminals!



Ahem, I feel better now. Sorry for screaming. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. These reporters are criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's right. They should have reported this immediately
I worked for a legal paper several years ago and got to cover a hearing where a guy on trial for hiring a hitman to kill his wife was trying to subpoena a reporter's notes. He said this was because the informant/shooter was supposedly in love with her and only gave him up because that's what she wanted him to say. He lost. I learned alot about shield laws attending those hearings. It's sacrosanct when it's legit.

These papers have huge legal departments filled with high-priced legal talent. They all knew Miller, Cooper and Novak were accomplices but the spin worked for awhile. Remember when Judy was in jail and every major news outlet was up in arms? They were aware that the reporters were slime for doing what they did, but they are worse slime for catapulting the propaganda every day. Fake virtue makes me :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. and another brick in the wall
we'll have to see if there is any filings today, I just checked and the only new filing is approval by Walton for Fitz motion on an Extension of time.

Gotta wonder what will be there tonight.

Thanks kpete! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, tonight....
Edited on Fri May-26-06 02:13 PM by kpete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. these were the one released with the other 2 filings from 05/24/2006
Edited on Fri May-26-06 02:55 PM by stop the bleeding
for a total of 3 PDF filings for that date

4 pages, 10 pages, and 20 pages all three are in the DU Research Forum under the Libby Plame Filings - I'll be back in a second with a link.


Ok I'm back here ya go

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&address=358x3589

I need to go and get some of the older ones from Fit'z site that are from 2004/2005 and add them to the list as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. thanks
another interesting week...

I have wondered though...

No odds at Intrade for a Rove Indictment -

Usually when something is up the $$$ people are on it like flies to jam...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC