Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Students Rush to Block Exit Exam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:13 PM
Original message
Students Rush to Block Exit Exam
Students Rush to Block Exit Exam

Written for the web by Elizabeth Bishop, Internet News Producer

E-mail Story Print Story
student test 185

Attorneys for a group of students who sued the state to suspend the high school exit exam have filed an emergency request with a state appeals court. They want the court to urgently hear their claims the test should be suspended for this year's graduating class.

On Wednesday, the state Supreme Court stayed a lower court's injunction that had barred the exam from taking effect for the Class of 2006. It meant the exam would be a requirement for seniors to graduate.

The students and their parents argued that the exam is discriminatory because all California students do not have equal preparation or instruction.

http://www.kxtv.com/storyfull2.aspx?storyid=17775
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. "equal preparation or instruction"
The students and their parents argued that the exam is discriminatory because all California students do not have equal preparation or instruction.

That's consistent with what I learned going to school. Rich kids get great teacher-to-student ratios, well-equipped science labs, and interesting elective courses. Poor kids get shit. But everyone in the state has to take the same standardized tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not possible to provide equal preparation or instruction to all students
Edited on Fri May-26-06 01:30 PM by slackmaster
That's not a reasonable demand.

The question should be whether students who get the bare minimum have received adequate opportunity to prepare themselves for the test. If not, those schools that don't provide it need to be fixed. Even then there will be students who fail.

The test itself is not the problem. Many of the students who are failing it do so because they are lazy, intellectually deficient, or are the victims of problems at home. The state and the schools can't be held responsible for them.

If nobody fails the test, then it's not measuring anything meaningful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If there is a *real* solution available to kids whose schools don't
meet the minimum then I would agree with you. But how do we determine the minimum functioning for a school? How do we provide a practical solution to students whose schools have not met that minimum?

I am not completely anti-testing -- but Jonathon Kozol write persuasively about why teachers ought to refuse to test anyone until the school systems are improved for all students.

His latest books are "Savage Inequalities" and "Amazing Grace"

As the 1980s come to a close and the frantic echoes of A Nation at Risklinger in the corridors of America's public schools, the realities of lives and learning within these schools moves further and further away from the foundation of equity and democracy upon which public education in the United States was built. One short year before the presidency moves out of the hands of Republican leadership, Jonathan Kozol's publication of Savage Inequalities exposes the gross disparities existing between public school districts serving the poorest of the poor and the most affluent sectors of American society. And because such economic disparities are often colored by the lines of racial discrimination, single motherhood, and lacking legal protections for youth, Kozol's work also sheds light on overlapping inequalities emergent in public education at the dawn of the 1990s. Such disparities merely reflect the growing gap between rich and poor exacerbated by Reganomics of the previous decade--and the public schools, Kozol shows us, do little to rectify these ongoing American "savage inequalities."

Continuing on a prolific course, Kozol's seventh book follows a long line of powerful writings on education, poverty, homelessness, and hope for the future of young people. In Savage Inequalities, Kozol guides readers through public schools across the United States and introduces us to the lives of children, adolescents, teachers, and administrators who learn and work in them. Through their words and actions, Kozol masterfully brings these people to life, and in the case of the children, forces us to hear and contemplate their dreams and desires for a complete adulthood. While many of these dreams are similar across economic, racial, or gendered lines, we learn that the paths for reaching those futures are unevenly paved.

This is all too clear when Kozol begins to describe the disparate quality of education that exists between poor and rich school districts in the Untied States. Entering schools in East Saint Louis, poverty stricken sectors of New York and Chicago, in the ghettos of Washington D.C., and economically disenfranchised Camden, New Jersey, Kozol describes buildings, faculties, curricula, and school boards that are all but falling apart. School overcrowding forces some classes into bathrooms in these schools; lacking funds make it impossible to teach science labs or have textbooks for students to take home; in other cases rivers of water pour through stairwells because there is simply not enough money in the budget to fix aging plumbing. Meanwhile, in such affluent suburban schools as Chicago's New Trier High or Rye, New York's Morris High, students enjoy the luxuries of campuses boasting newly remodeled auditoriums, student lounges, wood-paneled libraries brimming with books, extensive computer laboratories, and excellent teachers whose average salaries will soon reach $70,000. In these schools, students typically study foreign languages for five years, and approximately 40% of the student body enrolls in Advanced Placement course work. The inequities are salient--the opportunities afforded the children in these separate and unequal school sites as different as day and night.

At the heart of these inequities, and the heart of Savage Inequalities, is the disturbing inequitable allocation of tax dollars to fund schools and school districts in the United States. These economic inequities are gross and inexcusable. For example, in one of the wealthiest districts on New York's Long Island, the per pupil spending amounts to $11,265 annually. Meanwhile, impoverished sectors of New York City see only $5,590 per student--approximately half the amount funneled into the rich school districts. Because of the ways American public schools are funded, Kozol demonstrates, the rich are afforded greater access to knowledge and cultural capital which will insure their continued affluence. Likewise, the poor remain segregated in dwindling public schools whose lack of funding often determines their students will learn little more than how to function in a service-sector economy, or worse yet, to assume a position within the growing underclass of unemployed American citizens. In the end, the price for such disparities need to be considered.

<http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~daniel_sch/assignment1/1991kozol.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I can tell you one way NOT to measure a school's performance
By relying solely on a comparison between its students' test scores, and those of other schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed - that is part of the vicious circle - so we have to have some
other criteria in terms of number & quality of teachers, educational programs, supports for students who are struggling and willing to work hard, ability of the school to engage parents in schooling...

Right away we now how outrageously uneven quality of public schools are because *all* of the above issues do hinge on funding, and funding is linked to property taxes, and kids born to rich parents live in big houses and go to schools with excellent funding...

Does $$ fix everything in schools - no, but the most important factor in study and after study after study is teacher-student ratio and teacher training and support - you just don't get that without $$.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's really pathetic is the low level at which the exam is written.
Says a lot about the overall quality of education in CA (quite bad).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. delete
Edited on Sat May-27-06 04:42 AM by lindisfarne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC