Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any lawyers here who can answer why Enron crooks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:39 PM
Original message
Any lawyers here who can answer why Enron crooks
Lay and Skilling aren't getting sentenced for three and a half months? Is this the usual practice? I thought convicted crooks went straight to jail. Inquiring minds want to know...:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. We were wondering this last night too.
If I robbed someone, could be out on bail before the trial. Once I was tried and convicted, off to jail to file appeals. So why not these guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not a criminal lawyer, but my guess is that there are different procedures
for white collar criminals.

They aren't violent. They aren't going to hurt anyone. They get some time, perhaps, to take care of their affairs especially since they very well may never get to get out of wherever it is they are going.

Doesn't make sense to put them in high security prisons either, since that is costly.

Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What was the color of Stalin's collar? Apparently he never did manual
labor. However, he was arrested under the Czar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is standard in federal cases
90 days is pretty normal. The feds put together their sentencing recommendations which are based upon a calculation using the sentencing guidelines and the monetary value of the fraud in question. Usually the report is about 50 or so pages long and details everything. In this case, it will most likely be much longer and more complicated. It's a ton of work. Then they have to provide it to the defense who must be given ample opportunity to try to rebut it and then the feds get the final rebuttal and a judge sentences. Even after sentencing, typically the defendent has another 30 days left of freedom before having to report to prison.


It's completely standard in federal cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thanks. That clears it up.
Seems like it would be more "fair" if they waited for their sentencing from a jail cell, but hey wouldn't want to push Lay's beatific, "I'm so blessed!" mantra...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. thank you
so far they have been convicted, but not sentenced.

Do you mean this is standard in all federal cases? So all I'd have to do is be tried in fed court rather than state/county? That is a serious question, not that I'm being tried for anything, but just trying to understand. Thank you for your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes, it's pretty standard in all federal cases
The only exceptions are when the defendent is judged a flight risk, or there is violance associated with the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Heard they made him give up passport before releasing him
not to say that someone with brazilions of dollars in a swiss bank account and facing the rest oftheir life in jail would skip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Yeah the passport thing is pretty standard
Even with a big bundle of cash it isnt easy to stay hidden anymore. In some respects the cash would make it harder. These guys couldn't suvive like Bin Ladin in a cave somewhere. They are high maintenance. That leaves a trail. They're fucked and justly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Depends on the jurisdiction and
the applicable law in this case. Judges have a lot of discretion, too, but if they've filed notice of appeal, that would be a factor. They've surrendered their passports, and they're convicted. There are a lot of pre-sentencing matters that have to be done by the court, and they're very time-consuming, especially in a case like this.

Hope that helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It Takes Time
To book a hotel room in the Cayman Islands this time of year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Heh, heh. You're as cynical as I am. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. There was some pundit on CNBC yesterday who said
it would actually be harder for them to appeal, since Skilling wasn't convicted on all counts. He said it showed the jury did some careful deliberation on each of the charges, as opposed to blanket condemnation. Any thoughts on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's an odd statement
Appeals aren't based on looking at the evidence again and determining if the jury got it right. Appeals are procedural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It is?
That's why I thought I'd ask all you lawyers what your take was on this.:-)
(And here I was thinking the jury was being wily.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. One ground for possible appeal (not here though)
Is that the jury failed to deliberate on the evidence (e.g., convict quickly on all counts even though varying degrees of evidence). That would also be ground for a post-trial motion for j.n.o.v.

I don't know if such a post-trial motion has already been filed and denied, but I'll breathe a bit easier once it has, and once we see what kind of b.s. grounds for appeal the defense comes up with.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Nope
Not a one.

I'm glad the trial is over, and now, frankly, let them rot wherever they are. The people have spoken.

The rest of their lives will be shame and hell, and that's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not good enough to suit me
Once Kenny Boy's $900K/yr. annuity kicks in, he won't feel a whole lot of shame. Heel, he still claims he's innocent and blessed. Frankly, being the poster boy for corporate crime hasn't bothered him too much so far. He needs to do time. sKilling too.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Oh, I doubt he's gonna hold onto that annuity
I seriously doubt it. He's gonna lose everything, I suspect.

The civil suits haven't kicked in yet, and that's gonna be where the REAL theater will show. All that money, all that spending, all those stock dumps............

Ah, they're gonna do time, don't you fret. That's my solid bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. The guy will most likely die in prison
most are predicting between 20 and 30 years for him, split it and call it 25. There is no parole in the federeal system and no early release. He'll get 2 months off for every 12 served (assuming he has no problems ni prison). He'll server over 20 years in prison and isn't exactly a spring chicken. Considering the lousy food, lousy health care provided, labor required of all inmates and his lack of will due to being beaten down for 20 years it is highly unlikely he will get out of prison alive. And if he does, good luck enjoying the money tha his wife and family don't spend at an advanced age and with 20 years of prison under his belt (that destroys a person).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Almost all appeals are prcedural in federal court.
The idea that you can appeal because a jury didn't fully deliberate your case is bunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. This ought to cheer you up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Big money has different rules
A common guy would have been sent to serve immediately, if prison was certain in the sentence to come. Most get put back in county jails until sentencing and then go to penitentiaries afterwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Read my above post. You are incorrect here.
The federal system doesnt care about big money. No matter how many people for some bizarre reason want to believe the wealthy skate the facts are different. State cases like OJ and Jackson are very differnt than federal cases where congressmen, sports figures, wealthy CEOs do siginifcant prison time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. forgot to add that common people cant come up with these huge bonds
that rich folks can. If you set a bail at 500 grand , who can afford that other than the wealthy?

Thats why the rich are favored in the system. They also get favor because they can afford the best lawyers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. And those lawyers did what in this case?
Kenny Boy was convicted on all charges. Skilling was convicted on quite a few of the ones he was up on.

You get a guy who did two or three felonies, and if you're a very fine lawyer you can get him off. You get a guy like Ken Lay, who I really feel committed felonies just for the hell of it, and no lawyer can get him off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC